With due respect, you actually don't "totally" know. This is why neuropsych evaluations are necessary. Teachers are not qualified to render the diagnosis. ASD is a spectrum and it's gotten to the point where people erroneously assume that every weird kid is autistic. I say this as someone with a child on the spectrum, so I am not in denial. When a kid doesn't need accommodations/extra support from the school, but a school will discriminate in admissions because of the label, I see literally no reason to disclose. And although your sentiment about neurodiversity being "acknowledged, understood, and supported" is lovely, it's a fantasy. These schools don't want such kids, but they sure do talk a big game about their inclusivity. |
I disagree. Schools like GDS are looking for reasons to exclude since they can choose their students. If 2 student have the same or similar profiles - one has ASD and the other doesn't- who do you take? This is a no brainer. |
Nothing has changed except the rates of diagnosis for neurodivergent. So those "quirky" kids were likely neurodivegent without a diagnosis. Sheesh. |
With advancements in science and medicine, many things that lacked formal diagnosis in prior decades are now being described with much more precision. How is this surprising or even controversial? |
No teachers are clueless. Seriously you sound like you have no experience navigating this issue. |
Agree. If you disclose autism, you are wasting their time and yours. Now they have to find a way to reject you politely and you get to sit through several months of false hope. Apply and don’t disclose, or don’t apply. It’s pretty simple. Private schools are mainly about exclusion — focusing resources precisely on the students who they choose. That is a large part of what makes the education so good. A byproduct is that the kids also learn from the schools how to sound inclusive while being exclusive. Which is a pretty important skill today, it turns out. |