It means that if a child didn't make "adequate" progress during the virtual part of the pandemic then they are in need of additional services. It could mean that they had trouble accessing virtual services due to lack of equipment, had trouble attending, did not learn in that manner, etc. The trouble is that you need to document for every student and hold a meeting and document in several places. It's very time consuming. It's a lot of work and then the services being offered are not much.
|
School choice is the ability to take your child’s educational dollars and find a private/charter school or hire a private one-on-one teacher. It’s NOT the just ability to choose another FCPS public school. |
It was an emergency, a state and federal emergency. Things aren't business as usual during an emergency. It made sense to make temporary IEPs for kids then. Instead of just lying. |
Employees have choice. |
Illegal |
It’s all such a mess.
We have services and when they contact us, I want to say no thanks. Don’t even have a meeting. Save yourselves some work. Is that an option? I really feel for these teachers. |
Can you explain further? What services are being offered? What are the metrics for progress? |
Well then thank goodness charters are illegal in Virginia, because historically they have no better outcome than public’s with way worse working conditions. |
You can say that. Teachers still have to hold the same meeting without you ![]() |
They still have to hold the meeting. |
+1 Staff here and I hope someone leaks the materials to parents. I attended both the parent and staff meetings. There WAS additional material covered in the staff meeting than in parent meetings. There were specific examples to help staff know how they should determine eligibility and services. If I was a parent, I would want to review the slides and FAQs before the IEP meeting. |
Services being offered are individual to the student and what progress wasn’t made. Johnny usually makes 1 year of growth in reading levels during a normal school year, but during virtual only grew half a year? Maybe an hour of private tutoring once a week after school to work on reading. Suzy has an IEP for speech but didn’t get a physical person present because FCPS was not meeting in person and therefor made minimal progress in speech goals because no one was able to physically shape her mouth? She will qualify to have a SP come to her house on Saturday for an extra 30 minutes a week. Larlo’s parents were worried he was going to fall behind during virtual so hired a math tutor (and have receipts to prove it?) They may be able to submit those receipts for reimbursement, if he didn’t get his math pull out accommodations. A kid who usually makes minimal growth in reading and online made minimal growth in reading should not qualify. A child who usually keeps up with grade level expectations and online met grade level benchmarks won’t qualify. There has to be proof (through testing data, sol scores, IEP narratives) that less than normal progress was made that year. |
And that really stinks. I don’t want even the meeting. |
But those staff materials didn’t have answers to anything. They were just “what would you do?” Scenarios with no “yes, he qualifies” or “no, she doesn’t because…” |
STOP! STOP with the pandemic nonsense just stop! Teachers were working and did their best in an unprecedented pandemic. And we all know you are from the same group of crazies that run around this board yelling about Covid. Get a hobby. |