Are 7th and 8th grades better than 5th and 6th, or still "chaotic"? We're considering 7th entry and would stay for high school. |
We are happy in 7th grade. I don't know much about classroom dynamics and my child doesn't complain about chaos. He has rigorous, interesting assignments, including essays, tests, and projects. He talks about what he's learning. At the same time, there isn't so much work that he can't participate in extracurriculars and he goes to sleep at a reasonable time every night. Between my two children, we've attended a lot of schools, public and private, and gds is the best so far. |
Thanks for this insight. When did your child start at GDS? 7th? Or earlier? |
Thanks for sharing. I share the PP's question about when your DC started at GDS. Also, how would you describe their personality? It seems like one of the main themes of this thread is that this environment can be a very good fit for more outspoken kids and not for the more reserved kids. My kid is reserved and thrives in a supportive environment, but is far more inclined to hold back and sort out his thinking / actions before jumping in. Wondering how he'd do here .We are applying to GDS and have been excited about it but this thread is giving me pause. |
| I personally was excited for my reserved child to attend GDS because I wanted him to be more outspoken. It worked for him. He's now in eight grade and just this morning was going on about how much he loves the school and begged me to stop asking if he wants to consider any other HS. |
He started in late lower school, but because of covid, in many ways last year was his first real year at GDS. He is outgoing when he feels comfortable and accepted. More inclined to participate in small group discussions than whole class. Tries his hardest when he finds the material interesting, but happy to coast if he doesn't see the point. |
I don't agree that the environment is only a good fit for outspoken kids. Others have commented on the MS' approach, but that doesn't mean it's only good for one type of kid, and our child would be a good example of that. If you/your kid does not like or can't get comfortable the approach or the atmosphere it goes along with it, that's perfectly fine and great that one can choose from many private schools in the area. But if what the MS is trying to get students to develop is something you value, our experience is that teachers in MS do work to get students comfortable advocating for themselves, being more active in class, and taking charge (as much as a kid can) of their learning. All that won't change our child's personality, but it is helping them develop those skills (and they really enjoy being at the school). We had a good sense of what they were good at/comfortable with when we were looking at private schools for MS, and wanted to find a place that would help them develop new skills and be comfortable in different environments. |
What do you mean by needs a “supportive environment.” If the class and loud and distracting, he has to be able to snap back by himself and finish his work. Not stay distracted. Hopefully that comes with maturity but for some kids all the jibber jabbering, calling out responses, side convos really set them back. Either they want to be social too so tune out or they just don’t have the self discipline to stay on task given all the action. |
| We are interested in the GDS middle school. My kid isn't reserved and doesn't need a lot of support, but also isn't one to be the first to shout out answers. My kid has expressed frustration in the past about disruptive kids in classrooms. The "disruptions" are distractions that hold the class back. Is it fair to say the "disruptions/chaos" spoken of in this thread are confident kids speaking up/out loud first and not kids who are disengaged/bored and making scenes that hold the class back? |
I posted upthread about my MSer being happy. He has never mentioned the kind of off task disruptions that you mention and I think he would if they are happening. |
Judging from the responses we heard over zoom for two years and once welcomed back into class, the shout outs are mere guesses as there was little instruction ever until the end. So students have to be smart enough not to remember the incorrect guesses, but how they eventually hopefully led to the correct answer in science or math. It really was led like a British college tutorial class, very student led, for better or worse. It was not efficient, that’s for sure. And easy to get confused. Then once confused, you’re done for for that lesson. |
Where is your other kiddo? Genuinely asking for my own child. Thanks |
I don't think the goal of good education is efficiency. The goal (at least gds's) goal is to learn how to think, engage, and discuss, rather than memorize a teacher-provided answer. |
| Sounds like how kids are supposed to reverse engineer how to spell or read by themselves, but applied to every class subject. |
We're talking about middle school, so presumably the kids all know how to read. |