What? That sounds insane. Get a second opinion. |
I'm the PP who wrote what you quoted. I agree that it's tricky to find a master list of schools with a history of being test optional. What worked for us is starting by looking for schools that had other attributes that seemed to meet my kids' needs (like school size, emphasis on experiential education, good schools for average students, etc.) and then looking at the language on their admission pages about testing. For example, one of the schools one of my kids applied to, Warren Wilson College in NC, says this: We search for individuals who demonstrate strong academic ability and curiosity, personal integrity, and alignment with our mission. In addition to your academic transcripts, we consider leadership, community engagement and other out-of-the-classroom experiences. We are proudly test-optional. Language like that sends a strong message that they really mean it when they say test optional and that students can feel confident about not submitting scores. |
Sorry read that Wrong. |
I'm from the south and familiar with Warren Wilson and have a good image of it for exactly the reasons you specify. I knew someone whose goal was to work there, in student affairs. When student affairs people really want to work at a particular college, and a small one at that, it often says something very positive about the place. With further googling, I came across this. You can sort the list "A to Z" in the "testing optional" vs. "test free" column, and I believe this is what I was hoping for. https://fairtest.org/test-optional-list/ I have twins, and this is going to be such an interesting experience. One sounds like your child(ren). The other is likely to be a candidate for a large school D1 athlete. So we will be looking at a lot of schools between them. May I survive this process! |
I pulled it from their CDS, not their website so which is incorrect? Page 12 - https://tulane.app.box.com/s/h7ez09u7tx68wsvxcgt4wt41nwl9vjml |
Crap, I just realized it's 2021-2022, they don't have the 2022-2023 CDS posted yet. |
It's not insane at all. A high SAT score offers almost zero predictive value for a kid with high grades (and good rigor). Since it doesn't actually help to answer the question it's ostensibly meant to address (Will this kid be able to handle our program?), it's valuable only if it creates some positive externality for the school. A score above the school's 75th percentile does that (by helping along the TO upward spiral of "median scores"); a score below the school's 75th percentile for the most part doesn't. |
A score about the 50th percentile also assists the school with the goal of raising published scores, just not quite as much. |
Not true actually, the research shows that test score plus gpa are more predictive, in a statistically significant way, than gpa alone. Add in that many schools artificially inflated grades in the Covid closure era and the immediate aftermath (sophomore and junior year for current applicants. Given the recent news about how far standardized test scores dropped generally, it is even crazier for schools to be test optional. But that is the system colleges are giving us. |
Link? |
https://www.ucop.edu/institutional-research-academic-planning/_files/sat-act-study-report.pdf Read the whole thing or skip to the last page, last paragraph. |
So fascinating! I will read the whole thing later but it struck me that the predictive value of GPA depends on the department and kinds of classes (large with standardized tests, etc). This may explain why LAC are fine with test optional and many have been doing it for years, where as large State Us may not be since their testibg tends to be scantron and closer to SAT testing. |
|
OP, my son was in this situation for nearly all of the colleges he applied to last year. He submitted the scores. He was admitted to 8 of 10.
Being a little below the median score means the student is typical, not that they're inferior. |
The irony that the UCs are now not even test optional but test blind |
The uc board of regents made that decision over the objections of the UC faculty, including the authors of this study, who felt the system should continue to use both test scores and gpa for admission. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2021/11/19/university-of-california-reaches-final-decision-no-more-standardized-admission-testing/ It was a purely political decision. |