Britney Spears wedding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, this poor girl. Everything about her and this is so cringey.

I think I'm the only one who believes she should still be in a conservatorship. One bad decision after another.

I always wonder why George Costanza is so obsessed with her as well.

She has been with him over five years, it’s not like it’s a drunken Vegas wedding like her first one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her own children weren’t at the wedding because they didn’t want to take away from their day?? Wtf? Or is the real truth they don’t approve?

They're teenage boys...and it was a paparazzi circus. I'm going to give them a pass on not wanting to attend, because...teenage boys.

She has said in the past they don’t want to be in the public eye. She respects their wishes on social last I looked.

I don’t really know her music much yet caught bits here and there of her life. I hope this guy is good and not a money seeker. I hope she is financially protected.

So if this is true, she chose having a wedding with paparazzi over keeping it small and private and including her boys. I don’t believe this. I think the boys refused to go for reasons completely unrelated to the circus. If I’m wrong though and she deliberately chose to have the type of wedding that would make her kids uncomfortable rather than pivot to something small, well, that says a lot about her as a mother.

She probably didn’t chose to have a wedding infiltrated with paparazzi[b]. I’m sure she didn’t chose to have her ex-husband act like a moron and crash her wedding. She’s a huge star. Things leak to the media. Especially since a number of her guests were huge stars.

How exactly did Vogue get pictures if they weren’t invited? Plenty of stars have small, quiet weddings without paparazzi. You do it by keeping your guest list limited to family (like her kids) and close friends instead of lots of other celebs. If her boys wanted to be there without paparazzi and she wanted them there, she could have made it work. This obviously either wasn’t a priority for her or her boys weren’t going to participate no matter what.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her own children weren’t at the wedding because they didn’t want to take away from their day?? Wtf? Or is the real truth they don’t approve?

They're teenage boys...and it was a paparazzi circus. I'm going to give them a pass on not wanting to attend, because...teenage boys.

She has said in the past they don’t want to be in the public eye. She respects their wishes on social last I looked.

I don’t really know her music much yet caught bits here and there of her life. I hope this guy is good and not a money seeker. I hope she is financially protected.

So if this is true, she chose having a wedding with paparazzi over keeping it small and private and including her boys. I don’t believe this. I think the boys refused to go for reasons completely unrelated to the circus. If I’m wrong though and she deliberately chose to have the type of wedding that would make her kids uncomfortable rather than pivot to something small, well, that says a lot about her as a mother.

She probably didn’t chose to have a wedding infiltrated with paparazzi[b]. I’m sure she didn’t chose to have her ex-husband act like a moron and crash her wedding. She’s a huge star. Things leak to the media. Especially since a number of her guests were huge stars.

How exactly did Vogue get pictures if they weren’t invited? Plenty of stars have small, quiet weddings without paparazzi. You do it by keeping your guest list limited to family (like her kids) and close friends instead of lots of other celebs. If her boys wanted to be there without paparazzi and she wanted them there, she could have made it work. This obviously either wasn’t a priority for her or her boys weren’t going to participate no matter what.

Inviting professional photographers from Vogue isn’t the same thing as having paparazzi. She probably got to review and approve everything that got shared /
posted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her own children weren’t at the wedding because they didn’t want to take away from their day?? Wtf? Or is the real truth they don’t approve?

They're teenage boys...and it was a paparazzi circus. I'm going to give them a pass on not wanting to attend, because...teenage boys.

She has said in the past they don’t want to be in the public eye. She respects their wishes on social last I looked.

I don’t really know her music much yet caught bits here and there of her life. I hope this guy is good and not a money seeker. I hope she is financially protected.

So if this is true, she chose having a wedding with paparazzi over keeping it small and private and including her boys. I don’t believe this. I think the boys refused to go for reasons completely unrelated to the circus. If I’m wrong though and she deliberately chose to have the type of wedding that would make her kids uncomfortable rather than pivot to something small, well, that says a lot about her as a mother.

She probably didn’t chose to have a wedding infiltrated with paparazzi[b]. I’m sure she didn’t chose to have her ex-husband act like a moron and crash her wedding. She’s a huge star. Things leak to the media. Especially since a number of her guests were huge stars.

How exactly did Vogue get pictures if they weren’t invited? Plenty of stars have small, quiet weddings without paparazzi. You do it by keeping your guest list limited to family (like her kids) and close friends instead of lots of other celebs. If her boys wanted to be there without paparazzi and she wanted them there, she could have made it work. This obviously either wasn’t a priority for her or her boys weren’t going to participate no matter what.

Inviting professional photographers from Vogue isn’t the same thing as having paparazzi. She probably got to review and approve everything that got shared /
posted.

+1. Inviting a discreet photographer from a high end magazine who will take flattering pictures and not write anything negative is way different from having a dozen photographers surrounding your house with high distance lenses. Vogue is not paparazzi

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kaching.

Exactly!

Secure the bag Mr. Spears!

[Anonymous]

What a bizarre guest list!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a bizarre guest list!

There’s an awkward video of Britney, Madonna and Paris dancing to the old hit “Vogue”

[Anonymous]

She is 40 years old and she looks beautiful and natural. She appears to have a strong support network of women friends.

Her dress is tasteful and classy unlike the recent Kourtney Kardashian wedding.

[Anonymous]

I’m not sure she really knows many of the guests? Not well anyway. I’m happy she’s free but very sad for her. Sad and worried.

[Anonymous]

Anyone think she has a prenup?

[Anonymous]

I don't know her, so while, as with any couple getting married, I hope things work out for the best, I don't care beyond that level.

[Anonymous]

I've seen several of her insta posts where she dances with crop tops and shorts on and pulls the shorts down a bit. When she wears a dress she's often dancing with one arm bent behind her back. I thought she was probably just pulling the dress to make it more fitting--similar to models having clothes pinned to fit better for pictures. THEN I see a pic of her walking down the isle after the ceremony is over and she's doing the same arm behind her back thing. Anyone know what this is about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, this poor girl. Everything about her and this is so cringey.

I think I'm the only one who believes she should still be in a conservatorship. One bad decision after another.

I always wonder why George Costanza is so obsessed with her as well.

She has been with him over five years, it’s not like it’s a drunken Vegas wedding like her first one.

Sam could leave her, a very very rich man, after another five years, and he won’t even be 35. It’s easy to play a long game when you’re young. And a man.

Maybe he’s genuine and will be a wonderful partner for the rest of their lives. If this doesn’t last, whether it just runs its course or it was the old mall along, it’s not like he sacrificed anything.

[Anonymous]

* or whether it was the plan all along

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, this poor girl. Everything about her and this is so cringey.

I think I'm the only one who believes she should still be in a conservatorship. One bad decision after another.

I always wonder why George Costanza is so obsessed with her as well.

She has been with him over five years, it’s not like it’s a drunken Vegas wedding like her first one.

Sam could leave her, a very very rich man, after another five years, and he won’t even be 35. It’s easy to play a long game when you’re young. And a man.

Maybe he’s genuine and will be a wonderful partner for the rest of their lives. If this doesn’t last, whether it just runs its course or it was the old mall along, it’s not like he sacrificed anything.

I think this new husband has been her longest relationship. And given that her first and second husbands and her dad all took advantage of her wealth, this new husband would at least be the most stable for her.