| Actually, I really think we should mask for the flu, it's actually the lesson we learned from the pandemic. And anyone who is sick should mask when indoors in public. |
Enjoy your masked life. The rest of us will manage as we managed before. |
Regular asymptomatic PCR testing of kids causes a lot of unnecessarily missed school, so no, that is not a good strategy in the face of an endemic virus. And giving your low risk teen Paxlovid is unnecessary and has costs to the community, because the drug is expensive. But I'm sure Pfizer executives are right with you on that one. |
Agreed. My kid and at least 2 others tested positive in random asymptomatic testing a few weeks ago (and it may have been more), which ended up in 50% of two different classes being quarantined... and those cases were never reported to the school community. We did receive ~5 other positive notifications over the next week, but none with matching numbers or dates. That said, all 3 kids I know about were totally asymptomatic, tested negative on PCRs within 24 hours of the initial test, never got a positive rapid and never spread it to anyone (including, in 2 of the case, unvaccinated family members)... so I am also somewhat skeptical of the testing. Are we sure they're matching student to test correctly? That there's no contamination? It just seems so strange that it happened in 3 cases in the same round of testing. |
I doubt there are many mix-ups or lab errors. Your story is evidence of the needlessness and harmfulness of asymptomatic testing in schools. We all need to opt out of that racket. |
You must not care about a lot of things PP. I mean you send your kids to DCPS. Should have worked harder in school to afford private like me! !
|
|
The CDC says 80 percent of DC kids and 65 percent of DC adults have already had coronorvirus, and that was before the current surge.
Seems pretty clear by now that everyone is going to get Covid regardless of what they do. |
Eww. Gross. |
so 30 kids totally disrupted (during parcc!) because of kids who were not sick and probably not infectious. sounds great! |
Both comments are gross. |
It's a fine strategy, because they don't then give it to ten other kids. And how you treat your teen is between you, your kid and your doctor. But it is available to 12+. |
No, it's terrible. I am saying both that I know the DCPS data being reported at my kids' school is wrong and that I'm not even convinced that the underlying testing is accurate. As a result, I am totally skeptical of all of the numbers being reported and of the value of asymptomatic testing at all in a non-vulnerable setting. (I can see the case for batch population random testing on nursing home populations to make sure you catch surges where they could do real damage.) |
Sounds like you don't understand the problems with PCR testing in this context. PCR tests identify lots of "cases" that are not actually contagious. There is a cost to that, and it's missed school. Given that Covid is such a low-risk virus for kids, the harm of those missed days of school for non-contagious kids outweighs the benefits of potentially prevented spread. There is also a financial cost to this strategy, and the money would be better spent on other things (such as tutoring to make up for the massive learning loss the school closures caused). This argument was already made by some experts last spring, and it's even more valid now that kids can be vaccinated and most have already had Covid. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/04/19/schools-covid-testing-cost/ Clearly though, you don't care about costs to society, financial or otherwise, if you think healthy 12-year-olds should receive Paxlovid while it is still expensive and scarce. |
Here's a recent study from Italy on the cost of masking. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.10.22274813v1.full.pdf |
I cannot believe anyone listens to Monica Gandhi. She has been wrong so many times. But never in doubt. It is gross. |