Wedding of Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe he wanted to settle down with someone who isn't after him for his family wealth because she has more money.

I watched the British Vogue Mr and Mrs video, and their favorite date night is staying in to watch the Gilmore girls.

I read that he is obsessed with her. He doesn't have much going on and he latched on her big time.

That is 100% how he portrays it publicly. Could definitely be an act though

[Anonymous]

Looking at the pictures and so many of the guests look terrible!

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10706049/Brooklyn-Nicola-share-snap-inside-3-5m-Florida-wedding.html

Here’s a clear look at the bride and groom. Surprisingly understated and lovely.

[Anonymous]

Yee gads the bridesmaids dresses. Not the little girl bridesmaids who are cute but the matrons/maids of honor. Their dresses are so far down off the shoulder and to me very ugly.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand ppl without a job. How does that work?

[Anonymous]

The wedding costs $3.5 million? Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand ppl without a job. How does that work?

Her father is a billionaire, that’s how.

[Anonymous]

Most excited that the bride wore a wedding gown with straps!
May this usher in a popular alternative to the vastly-overdone strapless/one size does-not-fit-nor-flatter-all gown.

And I don’t think Nicola has a visible tattoo? I show myself out now to scream at children for being on my lawn. #52

[Anonymous]

I didn’t know who the bride was before this, but I think her hair color with roots looks bad for one’s wedding day.

[Anonymous]

... it must KILL Javanka that they weren't invited to this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not saying they’ll have kids anytime soon, but it is increasingly status symbol to be a young hot rich mom.

I think that ship has sailed, in this case.

[Anonymous]

I keep looking at the Daily Mail pics and I really kind of love how NORMAL so many of the guests look. It makes this family seem way more down to earth than I would have expected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not saying they’ll have kids anytime soon, but it is increasingly status symbol to be a young hot rich mom.

I think that ship has sailed, in this case.

27 is fairly young these days to have kids, if she chooses to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:... it must KILL Javanka that they weren't invited to this

OMG haha. I never thought of that but you are 100% right.

So many of the guests look very British.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is 23 considered “pretty young” to get married?

Because it is. The average first marriage age for an American male is 29 and for an American female it's 27.]

I barely know any married younger millennials or older Gen Zers in their early-mid 20s, but I’m an older Millennial born in the mid-80s and like, 23-26 was prime wedding time for me and my friends. Multiple weddings every summer and fall, people showing up at work with engagement rings all the time.

Where are you from, and where were you living from 23-26? I'm roughly the same age and this was not at all my experience. I was 26 when my first friend got married (and she's a couple years older than me), and prime wedding time for my friends was 29-33. I feel like that is much more the norm of our peers, but it may be a urban/rural or regional divide thing.

Exactly. 23 is too young to get married in the 21st Century.