Maybe some people but one of the very first things I noticed, when my kid started Pre-K, was how many of the other parents attended Ivies. I was able to put 2 + 2 together and realize whatever admissions stats the school had, legacy status was a BIG factor. And neither DH nor I went to an Ivy, so our kids certainly won't be part of that set. Many years later, we are still at the same private, because of the experience. |
|
Those admissions arent from the last two years at the Big 3. Things are very different. Get you 4.0 at FCPS or MCPS and waltz to the front of the line. You dont need a ACT/SAT.
What a joke, |
|
My DC unlikely to get into Ivy. Not sure I would want that for her anyway.
Her private is full of dedicated teachers and support staff. The teachers and school answer emails the same day and partner with us to help our kid succeed. A big fight is when one girls yells at another in the lunch room (very very rare). |
I know bolded is not true because I am a former teacher. |
You forget that a rather large number these people are not actually "dropping $50k" -- at least not of their own money. |
|
Cant keep raising tuition and having full payers not get in to their college choices.
Not sustainable. |
| OP, maybe you aren't sending them to the right private school. |
Yes - the "system" works very well for them. Have other people pay for their place at an elite college. Brilliant on their part. |
|
However you spin it, there's an element of truth to it.
I wasn't sent to private school and wouldn't send children to private schools solely for college admissions. But it was sort of expected that the school would help you get into a "good" college, either through the quality of the education as training for the rigors of a good college, or that the school's name would help provide a bump in admissions. I do remember reading college admissions books back in the 1990s and there was frank discussions from actual admissions officers about how this applicant went to a good private in a midtier city and they liked students from that school so she was admitted. The problem is that the private schools are *so expensive* nowadays that if they don't help you get a bit of an advantage anymore, it's one more strike against going to private schools. In the DMV, many of the old private school families have already been priced out. If the perception emerges that it's a strike against you being a student from a private school in the equity-mad world of progressive admissions officers, it's a weird turnabout from the past, fair or not, and does hurt private schools in the long run. |
Ew. Just stop. And it's amazing how public school is still worker for asian american children. Hmmm. |
|
[quote=Anonymous]Not the reason my kids are in private school... especially with the state of the public school system right now with the pandemic and post pandemic. So grateful to be able to provide them this experience. [b]Even if it is really costing us financially.[/b] [/quote]
lmao. dumb move. |
OP, our DCs have been in private since K. I wanted them to go public, partially for the college admit reason, but I lost the coin toss. I am, however, glad that I lost it. Both DCs have really loved their experiences. Yes, there are times of drudgery, competitiveness, etc. yet also joy when you landed a great elective with a teacher who approaches the class like a college seminar. Our DCs are emphatic that they really wouldn't want to have been at any other place. And both of them got into great colleges and we are not URM, Questbridge, etc. |
I was a Biglaw partner and one of the very few partners who didn't send their kids to private -- including many to the Big 3. My impression was that all of my partners were obsessed with name brand colleges and that that's why they sent their kids to private schools. So maybe my study sample was skewed. Interestingly, not very many of them got their kids into Ivies in the end. |
??? |
Is this the complete list? |