Right...it may be that OP heard this but it's certainly not a widely held belief. DCPS pays for the SATs (and I believe most public schools around here pay for the SATs) for all students so kids around here are more likely to focus on the SATs. In the midwest, public schools are more likely to pay for/offer the ACTs for all students. So there are certain tests that tend to dominate in some regions. Over time, that regional dominance has waned somewhat , due to the belief that some kids do better on one or the other (so some kids will take the test not offered by their public school) but there is zero evidence that one is "easier" than the other. |
This is probably true for UMC kids...but most public school kids focus on the test their school offers for free. |
Well, whoever that is she's not an expert. And what exactly is a "non-intellectual" student? |
| Anxious helicopter parents on here handwringing over which test their anxious kids should take. Newsflash: there's no clear answer, and you're not gonna find one. Just take both and be done with it. |
Right, and what I "heard" (from a friend) is that admissions officers are suspicious of SAT scores because it's easier to get accommodations from the College Board than from the ACT...all of this is equally ridiculous. Admissions officers have to look at the two tests the same because they are offered with different frequencies in different parts of the country. Their official policies is that there is no preference...so they cannot prefer one over the over. |
You think a 2018 concordance table is current, never mind accurate? |
If it's put out by the testing agencies (and hasn't been updated), why wouldn't it be accurate? |
It is means to show ADs the relative academic levels of those taking each test because people used to only take one or the other. I doesn't and can't factor in the reality that some kids are better taking one test or the other. My DC's SAT score concordance would suggest the ACT score should have been 4 points high than it actually was. It isn't meant to be an individual performance predictor. |
It is the only table created by a joint study between ACT and College Board. It is the only table that has any hope of being accurate, from a standardized, statistical perspective. Now, if you want to consider colleges' perspectives, then look at the score ranges published by the individual colleges, which may differ. Beware of older tables out there. College Board put out a table in 2016 that was based on a very limited study, when it first issued the Redesigned SAT. Not valid anymore. There are also a number of random websites referencing the really old tables, from around 2009. Often these websites don't even realize that they've linked up to super old data. |
I agree with this. My kids scored wildly different between the tests. However, the concordance table may be helpful for students, especially juniors, trying to figure out which of their scores is "better," when trying to decide which test to focus prep on going forward. However, I would suggest to seniors, with testing all done and scores already in hand, to look at their colleges' published data to decide about whether and which to submit. |
Or just take one and be done with it? |
Sure. Take one if you're not anxious. Take both if you are. But obsessing over which is better? That's only for the insanely and irrationally anxious. |
| And be thankful your kid is actually able to choose or to take a test at all unlike many in the Class of 2021. |
Man you are cool. I would pay big money to subscribe to your newsletter. Please leave some chicks for the rest of us though. |
|
I think it’s pick your poison. If your kid has fast processing speed probably ACT is better since questions are more straight forward if your kid is more of a slower but appreciates higher level critical thinking go with SAT.
My DD “enjoyed” the SAT format better so we went with that. She’s actually a very fast reader but the ACT format was too exhausting. She scored mid 1400s. Since she put no effort into ACT (only one practice test) we have no idea which one she would have done better with ultimately. Her scores were high enough for what she wanted. |