Just found out that a nice person I know is a Republican

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

If you don't understand, your parents failed to teach you right from wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

If you don't understand, your parents failed to teach you right from wrong.

Nice personal attack on PP, who is correct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

If you don't understand, your parents failed to teach you right from wrong.

Nice personal attack on PP, who is correct

Agree. That's what liberals do when they have no defense. Personal insults.

But it's true. But with Hillary, it's even worse. She actively sought to use Russian intelligence. With Trump Jr., it was a passive action (which, as the other PP pointed out, was a ruse.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

Wait, let’s be sure to understand your explanation: You’re admitting DonJr, Manafort, and Kushner all attended the meeting with the person they understood to be a Russian govt agent, to get oppo research in Clinton. Is that correct?

And I Gerger you think it’s ok to do that? Is that right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I know lots of really good Republicans. I know lots of really good Conservatives. I don't know any good people who support Trump. That's the line. You cannot be a good person and a Trump supporter. They are incompatible.

Agree. There are no good Nazis, no good rapists, no good Kluckers, no good terrorists, ... and there are no good Trump supporters. They all need to be removed. They know what he is doing. They are supporting an anti-American traitor and thief. They are a threat to our society and should be removed.

This does sound like Nazi thinking. How ironic it is that it's coming from a liberal. I have one question for the OP and pp. Do you really want to live in a country where everyone thinks like you, supports what you do, votes like you, etc. That has happened in history many times before and we know how those countries turn out.

I definitely don’t want everyone to think like I do. But you don’t let a rabid dog sleep in your house. Traitors are subject to the law. Anti-American trump supporters are bad for the county. “Making america great again” requires removing such traitors from society.

These posts just get better and better. Bookmarking all of them!
And btw, I consider traitors to be the people who agree to let enormous groups of illegal, inverted immigrants into our country, and who feel that defending our borders makes us “racist.”

You haven’t been paying attention. I couldnt give a shit about your racism. It’s your support for an anti-American traitor. He is selling our country out to Russia to line his own pockets. If you support that, you are a traitor.

You folks keep saying this.
Outline for us “rubes” exactly what actions he has taken to sell out our country. Be specific.

DP here. I'll spell it for you. Based on publicly available information, which of course may not be accurate or tell the whole story. Trump has been money laundering for Russian oligarchs for many years, so he was already in bed with the Russians. They convinced him to run for office. Promised to continue to do business together. Put together the tower in Moscow deal. That one didn't work out, but there are other deals.

They offered him help. In exchange, he promised to lift sanctions and to turn a blind eye to their actions in Ukraine and elsewhere. Things neither Clinton nor any Republican would have done. He accepted the offer. They helped him. He won. He tried to lift sanctions but wasn't successful. It's been reported that he isn't enforcing, or enforcement is spotty. It's been reported that he said Crimea belongs to Russia.

He hasn't really responded to their recent actions in the Ukraine. Today he said he wouldn't meet with Putin, but the timing of that is suspect, and it's really not a big deal anyway. But if Trump doesn't respond in a forceful way, Putin gets away with it, and is free to make his next move.

The legal crimes here are bribery, conspiracy to defraud the United States and violations of elections law. The political crime is subversion of American foreign policy. Treason in colloquial terms, but not treason according to the Constitution.

That's the short version. There's a lot more detail in the public record. And it's only a fraction of what Mueller has. Which is very complicated, and why the investigation is taking so long. Lot's of information, and Mueller has to be thorough so the case is airtight. He won't get a second chance.

Mueller is operating the way he has in the past. He gave sweetheart deals to low level guys in order to get the top guy. Sammy "the Bull" Gravano killed 19 people, but Mueller wanted the top guy, John Gotti and the rest of the gang. So Gravano got only 5 years in jail for 19 murders, with 4 years off for time served, so really just a year. And Mueller got Gotti and took the whole gang out. That's why Mueller is cutting perjury deals. Not because that's the best Mueller can do, but because he wants to catch everyone including Trump.

Of course, we could be wrong about all this. But at least you now know what we are thinking. We could be wrong and it will all fizzle out. Mueller has a reputation for being very thorough. Which takes time. We'll wait. Impatiently wait.

This is your only accurate statement. The rest of your post is really the result of a brainwashing from your left-wing media.
Truth be told - Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama ever was.

Considering a lot of what I wrote is undisputed facts, some of which have nothing to do with Trump, your fact-free opinion is totally worthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I know lots of really good Republicans. I know lots of really good Conservatives. I don't know any good people who support Trump. That's the line. You cannot be a good person and a Trump supporter. They are incompatible.

Agree. There are no good Nazis, no good rapists, no good Kluckers, no good terrorists, ... and there are no good Trump supporters. They all need to be removed. They know what he is doing. They are supporting an anti-American traitor and thief. They are a threat to our society and should be removed.

This does sound like Nazi thinking. How ironic it is that it's coming from a liberal. I have one question for the OP and pp. Do you really want to live in a country where everyone thinks like you, supports what you do, votes like you, etc. That has happened in history many times before and we know how those countries turn out.

I definitely don’t want everyone to think like I do. But you don’t let a rabid dog sleep in your house. Traitors are subject to the law. Anti-American trump supporters are bad for the county. “Making america great again” requires removing such traitors from society.

These posts just get better and better. Bookmarking all of them!
And btw, I consider traitors to be the people who agree to let enormous groups of illegal, inverted immigrants into our country, and who feel that defending our borders makes us “racist.”

You haven’t been paying attention. I couldnt give a shit about your racism. It’s your support for an anti-American traitor. He is selling our country out to Russia to line his own pockets. If you support that, you are a traitor.

You folks keep saying this.
Outline for us “rubes” exactly what actions he has taken to sell out our country. Be specific.

DP here. I'll spell it for you. Based on publicly available information, which of course may not be accurate or tell the whole story. Trump has been money laundering for Russian oligarchs for many years, so he was already in bed with the Russians. They convinced him to run for office. Promised to continue to do business together. Put together the tower in Moscow deal. That one didn't work out, but there are other deals.

They offered him help. In exchange, he promised to lift sanctions and to turn a blind eye to their actions in Ukraine and elsewhere. Things neither Clinton nor any Republican would have done. He accepted the offer. They helped him. He won. He tried to lift sanctions but wasn't successful. It's been reported that he isn't enforcing, or enforcement is spotty. It's been reported that he said Crimea belongs to Russia.

He hasn't really responded to their recent actions in the Ukraine. Today he said he wouldn't meet with Putin, but the timing of that is suspect, and it's really not a big deal anyway. But if Trump doesn't respond in a forceful way, Putin gets away with it, and is free to make his next move.

The legal crimes here are bribery, conspiracy to defraud the United States and violations of elections law. The political crime is subversion of American foreign policy. Treason in colloquial terms, but not treason according to the Constitution.

That's the short version. There's a lot more detail in the public record. And it's only a fraction of what Mueller has. Which is very complicated, and why the investigation is taking so long. Lot's of information, and Mueller has to be thorough so the case is airtight. He won't get a second chance.

Mueller is operating the way he has in the past. He gave sweetheart deals to low level guys in order to get the top guy. Sammy "the Bull" Gravano killed 19 people, but Mueller wanted the top guy, John Gotti and the rest of the gang. So Gravano got only 5 years in jail for 19 murders, with 4 years off for time served, so really just a year. And Mueller got Gotti and took the whole gang out. That's why Mueller is cutting perjury deals. Not because that's the best Mueller can do, but because he wants to catch everyone including Trump.

Of course, we could be wrong about all this. But at least you now know what we are thinking. We could be wrong and it will all fizzle out. Mueller has a reputation for being very thorough. Which takes time. We'll wait. Impatiently wait.

This is your only accurate statement. The rest of your post is really the result of a brainwashing from your left-wing media.
Truth be told - Trump has been tougher on Russia than Obama ever was.

Considering a lot of what I wrote is undisputed facts, some of which have nothing to do with Trump, your fact-free opinion is totally worthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

It is illegal to get campaign assistance from foreign nationals. They should not have taken the meeting at all, and if they thought it was a ruse, they should have told the FBI.

It is not illegal to pay an American firm to get opposition research. It is also not illegal for that firm to hire a foreign subcontractor to gather intelligence in Russia.

That's the difference. Don Jr. taking the meeting to get foreign assistance is a crime. Hillary hiring a American firm is not a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

If you don't understand, your parents failed to teach you right from wrong.

Nice personal attack on PP, who is correct

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re a dolt. One “action” is that he set up and attended the meeting.

Traitors.

Broken record syndrome. You know no one is taking you seriously, right?

Still don’t have an explanation for that meeting, huh?

Face it. They were conspiring with the Russian government to disrupt a US election. There is no way to hide from that simple fact. I’ve asked dozens of time across many threads here for a straightforward and credible explanation of that meeting that doesn’t involve conspiring with Russia. No one has been able to give one. All I get is brush-offs and insults. You have no answer. They are traitors.

If by THAT meeting, you mean the one that Jr. attended with the Russian female lawyer? Yep, she said they had dirt on Clinton, and yes, he attended. Seems though that the Russian lawyer had met with Fusion GPS before this meeting, and after, and they spoke about adoption. Jr. walked out. Why the meetings with Fusion GPS?

You did not answer or explain the meeting.

1. DonJr received an email saying the Russian government wanted to provide him with Clinton materials
2. DonJr responded “I love it” and arranged a meeting between the Russian govt agent and DonJr/Manafort/Kushner.

What’s your innocent explanation for that sequence?

DP here.
Oppo research. But, they found that it was a ruse. Likely a set up given the meeting before and after with Fusion GPS. There is a reason Glenn Simpson pleaded the 5th before the House.
Now, tell us how that is so much different from the Hillary campaign and DNC receiving oppo research from a foreign national who got the information from Russians.

And, BTW..... if you think this shows any kind of “collusion” with Russia, this is why we laugh at you.

If you don't understand, your parents failed to teach you right from wrong.

Nice personal attack on PP, who is correct

Agree. That's what liberals do when they have no defense. Personal insults.

But it's true. But with Hillary, it's even worse. She actively sought to use Russian intelligence. With Trump Jr., it was a passive action (which, as the other PP pointed out, was a ruse.)

The PPs who attack "liberals" on this forum don't understand right from wrong. They also can't tell fact from fiction, and they love to project their own faults on to "liberals". Statements of fact.

If you find that insulting, perhaps take some time to reevaluate yourself and try to improve. Learn how to research and check facts before you go spewing lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I know lots of really good Republicans. I know lots of really good Conservatives. I don't know any good people who support Trump. That's the line. You cannot be a good person and a Trump supporter. They are incompatible.

Statements like this just crack me up. PP, you have ZERO idea who voted for Trump. Hint: many, many people that YOU know voted for him. And guess what? They're good people. They simply don't agree with your agenda. That you actually think they would engage you in conversation about their voting choices only emphasizes what an utter imbecile you are.

Agree! I SMH at the liberals here who start off a post with "OK, you Trumpster a-hole racist, tell me......." and then they expect you to lower yourself to engage with someone who talks to you like that.

And you're also right that these sanctimonious liberals who say that you can't be a nice person and a Trump voter would be shocked to learn that some of the nicest, most giving people they know voted for Trump. It doesn't fit their preconceived irrational belief, so they deny it.

If you voted for Trump, deep down something is broken. You are accepting and excusing behavior by the POTUS that is incompatible with "being a nice person". You can give to charity all day long, but you are a phony. There is a disconnect that allows you to compartmentalize being nice to people in your family, your friends, maybe even holding the door for someone at the Starbucks, but not giving a fig about what happens to other people as a result of what this administration is doing.

You support him, you are guilty by association. But enjoy donating those taxes he's saving you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I know lots of really good Republicans. I know lots of really good Conservatives. I don't know any good people who support Trump. That's the line. You cannot be a good person and a Trump supporter. They are incompatible.

Statements like this just crack me up. PP, you have ZERO idea who voted for Trump. Hint: many, many people that YOU know voted for him. And guess what? They're good people. They simply don't agree with your agenda. That you actually think they would engage you in conversation about their voting choices only emphasizes what an utter imbecile you are.

Agree! I SMH at the liberals here who start off a post with "OK, you Trumpster a-hole racist, tell me......." and then they expect you to lower yourself to engage with someone who talks to you like that.

And you're also right that these sanctimonious liberals who say that you can't be a nice person and a Trump voter would be shocked to learn that some of the nicest, most giving people they know voted for Trump. It doesn't fit their preconceived irrational belief, so they deny it.

If you voted for Trump, deep down something is broken. You are accepting and excusing behavior by the POTUS that is incompatible with "being a nice person". You can give to charity all day long, but you are a phony. There is a disconnect that allows you to compartmentalize being nice to people in your family, your friends, maybe even holding the door for someone at the Starbucks, but not giving a fig about what happens to other people as a result of what this administration is doing.

You support him, you are guilty by association. But enjoy donating those taxes he's saving you.

My only reaction to lunacy like the above post is a good, hearty laugh. Thanks, PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that Republicans need to face the fact that the GOP is a criminal organization, not just a political party.

Al Capone loved the “free market” and “small government” too. It makes it easier to commit crimes.

They should do this but they will choose to look the other way. Amoral turds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I know lots of really good Republicans. I know lots of really good Conservatives. I don't know any good people who support Trump. That's the line. You cannot be a good person and a Trump supporter. They are incompatible.

Statements like this just crack me up. PP, you have ZERO idea who voted for Trump. Hint: many, many people that YOU know voted for him. And guess what? They're good people. They simply don't agree with your agenda. That you actually think they would engage you in conversation about their voting choices only emphasizes what an utter imbecile you are.

Agree! I SMH at the liberals here who start off a post with "OK, you Trumpster a-hole racist, tell me......." and then they expect you to lower yourself to engage with someone who talks to you like that.

And you're also right that these sanctimonious liberals who say that you can't be a nice person and a Trump voter would be shocked to learn that some of the nicest, most giving people they know voted for Trump. It doesn't fit their preconceived irrational belief, so they deny it.

If you voted for Trump, deep down something is broken. You are accepting and excusing behavior by the POTUS that is incompatible with "being a nice person". You can give to charity all day long, but you are a phony. There is a disconnect that allows you to compartmentalize being nice to people in your family, your friends, maybe even holding the door for someone at the Starbucks, but not giving a fig about what happens to other people as a result of what this administration is doing.

You support him, you are guilty by association. But enjoy donating those taxes he's saving you.

My only reaction to lunacy like the above post is a good, hearty laugh. Thanks, PP!

Denial is a bitch, huh?