No rape victim ID

[Anonymous]

With the number of angry UVA threads going on in different fora, maybe this should be a sticky somewhere?

While it is clear there are severe problems with the Rolling Stone article, "Jackie" remains a potential rape victim. As such, I will not allow her identity to be revealed on DCUM or allow links to sites that reveal her identity. Similarly, I removed multiple posts that attempted to identify those accused in this incident. There are plenty of sites on the Internet on which you may engage in witch hunts. DCUM is not one of them. So, please save me the effort of deleting your post by not posting the identity or links to pages revealing the identity of this woman.

[Anonymous]

Written in Jeff style.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With the number of angry UVA threads going on in different fora, maybe this should be a sticky somewhere?

While it is clear there are severe problems with the Rolling Stone article, "Jackie" remains a potential rape victim. As such, I will not allow her identity to be revealed on DCUM or allow links to sites that reveal her identity. Similarly, I removed multiple posts that attempted to identify those accused in this incident. There are plenty of sites on the Internet on which you may engage in witch hunts. DCUM is not one of them. So, please save me the effort of deleting your post by not posting the identity or links to pages revealing the identity of this woman.

Add UVa to the list. I've never heard more vitriol against a school without facts to substantiate them! This affects people who went to UVa and never raped someone nor participated in any type of cover up. In fact, the only time you should publish accusations is if there are lawsuits or charges issued.

[Anonymous]

Written in Jeff style.

That's because it's Jeff. Quoted from one of the many many UVa/Jackie threads. I just thought he should make it a sticky.

[Anonymous]

(I'm not Jeff.)