|
Thought of you as I flipped though many, many pages of this to find UMD. LOL!
http://www.collegefactual.com/rankings/best-colleges/ (and yes, these lists are silly, but just wanted to share my giggle) |
|
Hmmmm....not so sure about GW beating out UChicago. UChicago ranking #36? Duke didn't even make the top 100?
I'm not a booster of UMD, Penn State, VA Tech, etc, etc, etc. But even I can't take this list seriously but it is good for a laugh. |
| No dog in this , didn't US news go out of business reporting the news? Are kodak and Enron doing restaurant reviews now? Who values any lists made by failures? US news with no news? Wtf? |
|
Hmmm.
The shanghai world university academic rankings Or College factual ...lol |
that line is getting old |
|
OP, can you give us the ranking? I started flipping through all those pages but I have a job to do.
I think UMD is a great school, regardless, and I'd be happy for my kid to go there. Just curious. |
Hmmmm.... Duke ranked #4. GW ranked #100 (it was Georgetown that ranked #33, ahead of Chicago -- at least PP got that ranking right). Maryland was #139. Have a look at the methodology page -- not perfect, but at least as good as USNWR. I don't see what makes this ranking any more or less joke-y than any other. |
Instant karma -- Duke actually was #3. Let's call that a typo and move on. |
page 14 I think I have no beef with UMD; it's a great school. And these rankings usually have very little meaning. It's just that the UMD booster is a little ridiculous so I wanted to tease him/her.
|
+1 |
| This actually looks like a pretty terrific site (beyond its rankings) -- tons of information with lots of different and interesting presentation options. |
+1. |
this ranking is bogus - there methodology http://resources.collegefactual.com/about/rankings-methodologies/best-colleges-rankings-overview/ requires data that they can't possible have access to in any meaningful way. Colleges and individuals just don't hand this data out. |