The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks so much better with that part and straight hair.

She can't pull it off. Its too severe on her face that's old and lined and harsh at 40...but she can't go back to bouncing ringlets because not only does she look silly but also her daughter is old enough to model the same hairstyle.

She’s beautiful. You’re insane.

She’s haggard.

It’s not bad. We all will be if we’re lucky. She just got there before many of us. 🤣🤣🤣

I’m the PP who said the hairstyle is too severe. IDK why she looks so bad at such a young age but it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and people who see her in-person say it’s worse.

I think it's:
1) An English Rose complexion that she pushed to be way too tan for way too long. Sun exposure REALLY catches up to you. Her sister is the same way.
2) Being extremely thin and dieting to get there. I think when you push your body too far past it's "normal" state it shows on your face.
3) Terrible dated makeup. She looked 10 years older at 27 with that awful (tattooed?) eyeliner and 1980s heavy blush. Now that she is actually aging, it's caught up with her face even faster and makes her look even more haggard.
4) Stress. While in some ways her life is enviable, I think there is a lot of stress on the world stage and within those palace walls. It takes its toll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair this is Camilla at 45 and she looked just as bad but Charles was after her like a hound still…

The man behind the couple in this picture looks like suffering from the gas cloud.

I think the man in front is her first husband - he has serious swag. No one talks about it but Camilla had/has lots of aristo friends in high places. She ran with the hunting set for decades.

Her grandmother was mistress to Charles' grandfather or something like that. Nice and comfortable with that set. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks so much better with that part and straight hair.

She can't pull it off. Its too severe on her face that's old and lined and harsh at 40...but she can't go back to bouncing ringlets because not only does she look silly but also her daughter is old enough to model the same hairstyle.

She’s beautiful. You’re insane.

She’s haggard.

It’s not bad. We all will be if we’re lucky. She just got there before many of us. 🤣🤣🤣

I’m the PP who said the hairstyle is too severe. IDK why she looks so bad at such a young age but it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and people who see her in-person say it’s worse.

Yes, she could be botoxed to death but isn’t. I’m not a Kate “stan” or anything but she’s more beautiful than 99% of us and yet still being torn apart here. And for her looks of all things. At least criticism of their workload or the declining relevance of the monarchy is worth discussing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her shape is amazing.

Rrrrrrr

William was having palpitations while his wife reprimanded Tom Cruise for messing up with his “Scientology”. That’s my funny interpretation.

Tom C looks haggard. So does Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her shape is amazing.

Rrrrrrr

William was having palpitations while his wife reprimanded Tom Cruise for messing up with his “Scientology”. That’s my funny interpretation.

Tom C looks haggard. So does Kate.

NGL, Tom does look haggard….which makes me feel some sort of way.

And, yes, Kate does, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her shape is amazing.

Rrrrrrr

William was having palpitations while his wife reprimanded Tom Cruise for messing up with his “Scientology”. That’s my funny interpretation.

Tom C looks haggard. So does Kate.

TC is 60. KM is 39.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks so much better with that part and straight hair.

She can't pull it off. Its too severe on her face that's old and lined and harsh at 40...but she can't go back to bouncing ringlets because not only does she look silly but also her daughter is old enough to model the same hairstyle.

She’s beautiful. You’re insane.

She’s haggard.

It’s not bad. We all will be if we’re lucky. She just got there before many of us. 🤣🤣🤣

I’m the PP who said the hairstyle is too severe. IDK why she looks so bad at such a young age but it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and people who see her in-person say it’s worse.

I think it's:
1) An English Rose complexion that she pushed to be way too tan for way too long. Sun exposure REALLY catches up to you. Her sister is the same way.
2) Being extremely thin and dieting to get there. I think when you push your body too far past it's "normal" state it shows on your face.
3) Terrible dated makeup. She looked 10 years older at 27 with that awful (tattooed?) eyeliner and 1980s heavy blush. Now that she is actually aging, it's caught up with her face even faster and makes her look even more haggard.
4) Stress. While in some ways her life is enviable, I think there is a lot of stress on the world stage and within those palace walls. It takes its toll.

5) Cigarettes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair this is Camilla at 45 and she looked just as bad but Charles was after her like a hound still…

The man behind the couple in this picture looks like suffering from the gas cloud.

I think the man in front is her first husband - he has serious swag. No one talks about it but Camilla had/has lots of aristo friends in high places. She ran with the hunting set for decades.

Run with the hunting set? Lots of people hunt in England. Many more than here.

Also, no one talks about how Camilla has lots of aristo friends? She’s about to be the literal queen of England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks so much better with that part and straight hair.

She can't pull it off. Its too severe on her face that's old and lined and harsh at 40...but she can't go back to bouncing ringlets because not only does she look silly but also her daughter is old enough to model the same hairstyle.

She’s beautiful. You’re insane.

She’s haggard.

It’s not bad. We all will be if we’re lucky. She just got there before many of us. 🤣🤣🤣

I’m the PP who said the hairstyle is too severe. IDK why she looks so bad at such a young age but it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and people who see her in-person say it’s worse.

Yes, she could be botoxed to death but isn’t. I’m not a Kate “stan” or anything but she’s more beautiful than 99% of us and yet still being torn apart here. And for her looks of all things. At least criticism of their workload or the declining relevance of the monarchy is worth discussing.

No, she’s more beautiful than like 10% of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks so much better with that part and straight hair.

She can't pull it off. Its too severe on her face that's old and lined and harsh at 40...but she can't go back to bouncing ringlets because not only does she look silly but also her daughter is old enough to model the same hairstyle.

She’s beautiful. You’re insane.

She’s haggard.

It’s not bad. We all will be if we’re lucky. She just got there before many of us. 🤣🤣🤣

I’m the PP who said the hairstyle is too severe. IDK why she looks so bad at such a young age but it’s obvious to anyone with eyes and people who see her in-person say it’s worse.

Yes, she could be botoxed to death but isn’t. I’m not a Kate “stan” or anything but she’s more beautiful than 99% of us and yet still being torn apart here. And for her looks of all things. At least criticism of their workload or the declining relevance of the monarchy is worth discussing.

No, she’s more beautiful than like 10% of us.

You don't get out much.

[Anonymous]

Seeing the unphotoshopped pictures, Rose actually looks much more similar to Kate.

[Anonymous]

Does Kate do her own makeup?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It tickles me that the whole of the UK is going through a crisis to the point that celebrity chefs are telling families to cook ramen noodles for dinner and the Secretary for the govt is advising them to get THIRD jobs. But it never ever comes up that the Queen's 3rd son has a 40-bedroom mansion he's sitting in.

Get rid of Bagshot and Chequers and send that cash to families.

With the Russian oligarchs money tied up, who do you think is going to buy those dumps? Do you want the royals to dump all their land in Cornwall and the other duchies? Do you want the City of London to be torn down and send everyone to Soutwark to do stock trading?

Seriously, do you know anything about real estate?

Hmmm Australia isn’t blind, deaf and dumb. The new PM is all about the cost of living crisis and anti-monarchy to boot!

But carry on with that $1 billion party for a 95-year-old UK, it’s going swimmingly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair this is Camilla at 45 and she looked just as bad but Charles was after her like a hound still…

The man behind the couple in this picture looks like suffering from the gas cloud.

I think the man in front is her first husband - he has serious swag. No one talks about it but Camilla had/has lots of aristo friends in high places. She ran with the hunting set for decades.

What are the diamond things hanging from a chain that they are both holding? Some sort of luggage tag?

That husband is handsome. Much more so than Charles!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair this is Camilla at 45 and she looked just as bad but Charles was after her like a hound still…

The man behind the couple in this picture looks like suffering from the gas cloud.

I think the man in front is her first husband - he has serious swag. No one talks about it but Camilla had/has lots of aristo friends in high places. She ran with the hunting set for decades.

What are the diamond things hanging from a chain that they are both holding? Some sort of luggage tag?

That husband is handsome. Much more so than Charles!

Explains why Anne was all over him and still is.