ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

My point is they are not taking a hard stance, it just says they are reviewing it? How can they win an argument or pressure mls with that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

Lemme guess you believe 9/11 was an inside job too?

I was thinking the same thing. This guy is nuts. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else heard that ECNL is expanding? I was told they will be admitting many teams this year from their RL league and essentially having an mlsn2 but not calling it that. Will still be ECNL but with relegation.

Essentially they will have a top league and a bottom ECNL league as well as ECNL-RL.

This goes along with a rumor of a potential merger of USYS and US Club.
Would this be considered a monopoly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else heard that ECNL is expanding? I was told they will be admitting many teams this year from their RL league and essentially having an mlsn2 but not calling it that. Will still be ECNL but with relegation.

Essentially they will have a top league and a bottom ECNL league as well as ECNL-RL.

This goes along with a rumor of a potential merger of USYS and US Club.
Would this be considered a monopoly?

Not sure how that merger has anything to do with ECNL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else heard that ECNL is expanding? I was told they will be admitting many teams this year from their RL league and essentially having an mlsn2 but not calling it that. Will still be ECNL but with relegation.

Essentially they will have a top league and a bottom ECNL league as well as ECNL-RL.

This goes along with a rumor of a potential merger of USYS and US Club.
Would this be considered a monopoly?

Not sure how that merger has anything to do with ECNL?

ECNL is the most powerful partner in US Club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

Exactly! and don’t forget that building 7 could not have fallen the way it did without the use of explosives…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

What is attempting to be relayed? Real or fake, we are all still waiting for a decision from mlsn. Nothing has changed.