A trivial matter....

[Anonymous]

Hi Jeff. This is totally minor but I was wondering if there was any sock puppeting going on in this thread. I'm having a hard time fathoming how multiple posters took offense at my comment about baby soap. Obviously not important but in case you ever have the time and inclination, I'm curious.

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/390087.page

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

[Anonymous]

I'm not Jef either but I agree OP seems a little sensitive if she bothered asking about sock puppeting based on that thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

Ha ha, and here I thought Jeff was all heated over baby soap!

I know it's not Jeff. I was being sarcastic. I was directing this question to Jeff, not the baby soap poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not Jef either but I agree OP seems a little sensitive if she bothered asking about sock puppeting based on that thread.

Well, it is clearly very important to me. That's why I titled this thread, "An Urgent and Weighty Matter."

[Anonymous]

What is sock pupetting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is sock pupetting?

Responding to posts as if you are different people, but with the same message. It then appears as if many different posters are in agreement with your message, when in fact, it's just you posting again and again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not Jef either but I agree OP seems a little sensitive if she bothered asking about sock puppeting based on that thread.

Well, it is clearly very important to me. That's why I titled this thread, "An Urgent and Weighty Matter."

Yes, and it's also why you let it go without making up a new thread and posting several more times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

Ha ha, and here I thought Jeff was all heated over baby soap!

I know it's not Jeff. I was being sarcastic. I was directing this question to Jeff, not the baby soap poster.

Yeah, but I thought I'd save Jeff the trouble. You were clearly interacting with only two people, so I'm not sure where the whole "multiple posters sock-puppeting" theory is coming from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

Ha ha, and here I thought Jeff was all heated over baby soap!

I know it's not Jeff. I was being sarcastic. I was directing this question to Jeff, not the baby soap poster.

Yeah, but I thought I'd save Jeff the trouble. You were clearly interacting with only two people, so I'm not sure where the whole "multiple posters sock-puppeting" theory is coming from.

So you are 8:40 and 8:49? (Any others?) If you aren't the PP from the soap thread then what is your interest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

Ha ha, and here I thought Jeff was all heated over baby soap!

I know it's not Jeff. I was being sarcastic. I was directing this question to Jeff, not the baby soap poster.

Yeah, but I thought I'd save Jeff the trouble. You were clearly interacting with only two people, so I'm not sure where the whole "multiple posters sock-puppeting" theory is coming from.

So you are 8:40 and 8:49? (Any others?) If you aren't the PP from the soap thread then what is your interest?

No, I'm only 8:40 and 9:34. And I'm the person from the original soap thread - which I clearly stated in my post at 8:40. Not that hard to understand...for most people.

Since I assume you're the OP of this thread, let me ask you a question: why is it so difficult for you to wrap your head around the fact that a) Castile soap can be irritating for some people, and b) more than one person was responding to you on the original thread? That you would suspect sock-puppeting, and then start this other thread asking Jeff to check it out for you is just nuts. This whole effing thing is all about you refusing to accept that not everyone enjoys using baby-mild Castile soap...it is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

^^^it's also ridiculous that I'm spending any time out of my day responding to you, so I'm not coming back to this thread, or the other one. So long, OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hi there, OP. Can I assume you're 13:25 from that thread? If so, you were interacting with me for several responses (I thought that was fairly obvious), and then a second person stepped in to respond after you called me a jerk. So, a whopping total of two people were responding to you.

Thanks Jeff.

When Jeff responds! he uses his name! not "anonymous."

Ha ha, and here I thought Jeff was all heated over baby soap!

I know it's not Jeff. I was being sarcastic. I was directing this question to Jeff, not the baby soap poster.

Yeah, but I thought I'd save Jeff the trouble. You were clearly interacting with only two people, so I'm not sure where the whole "multiple posters sock-puppeting" theory is coming from.

So you are 8:40 and 8:49? (Any others?) If you aren't the PP from the soap thread then what is your interest?

No, I'm only 8:40 and 9:34. And I'm the person from the original soap thread - which I clearly stated in my post at 8:40. Not that hard to understand...for most people.

Since I assume you're the OP of this thread, let me ask you a question: why is it so difficult for you to wrap your head around the fact that a) Castile soap can be irritating for some people, and b) more than one person was responding to you on the original thread? That you would suspect sock-puppeting, and then start this other thread asking Jeff to check it out for you is just nuts. This whole effing thing is all about you refusing to accept that not everyone enjoys using baby-mild Castile soap...it is ridiculous.

I don't find it difficult to "wrap my head around" the fact that different soaps cause different problems for different people. What i have a hard time wrapping my head around is how aggressive your response to my post was. And on this thread, too. Seriously, we were discussing baby soap. (I even took a step back by saying "I believe you" but that wasn't enough for you.) And now I am asking Jeff a question, not you, and yet you come on here with insulting and demeaning comments. That's what I am having a hard time "wrapping my head around."

Again, my question was directed to Jeff. Thanks.