
Exactly. the leadership exchanges between St Andrews and Oxford speak for themselves. Louise Richardson went from leading St Andrews to leading Oxford. Mapstone went from number 2 spot at Oxford to leading St Andrews. |
Computer science or adjacent programs. |
+1 |
Times Higher Ed has it at #30 in the UK along with a host of others |
Ah yes! The same global university ranking metrics which rank UW Madison and University of Illinois higher than Brown and Dartmouth. Yup, such metrics rank Manchester higher than St Andrews. Definitely helpful if you're trying to see which universities have the highest research expenditures. Not even remotely helpful when you're deciding where to go to undergrad. |
How are global university rankings, basically measuring research expenditure and size, at all useful here? Times change. St Andrews is now one of the most sought after schools in the UK, as confirmed by its UCAS entry tariffs: "St Andrews’ entry standards are only one Ucas tariff point lower than the highest in the country at Cambridge." https://dlv.tnl-uk-uni-guide.gcpp.io/universi...andrews-a0YyN9Z01Dsa |
Look at it - its not a global list, it's a UK list assessed by a UK publication that's been doing such assessments since time immemorial. |
This. And no 30 amongst UK schools is about right. |
Did you read the ranking? It quite literally extracted all of the UK universities from a global university ranking, hence the global ranking next to the UK ranking. There was no unique methodology other than that. 8 University of Manchester (Globally, =54) 9 University of Bristol (Globally, 76) 10 University of Glasgow (Globally, =82) 11 University of Warwick (Globally, =104) https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking#!/length/-1/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats The same rankings place Michigan State and Wisconsin-Madison above Dartmouth. Now again, explain how this is helpful for students deciding where to go to undergrad. |
Times Higher Education grew out of The Times newspaper.
How does The Times newspaper rank St Andrews in their own national rankings? Second in the UK. The Guardian? First The THE's own "Table of Tables" national ranking? St Andrews takes 3rd place https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankings_of_universities_in_the_United_Kingdom#The_Times/The_Sunday_Times |
I don’t get the hate on here? What does it prove?
My kid spent several weeks in Europe this summer and met kids from all over. He said all of them, especially the UK kids, were very impressed he is headed to St A’s. So clearly they are doing something right. Most kids who attend love the school, town and experience. |
Because it is smaller and a bit more akin to liberal arts colleges, StA is like an apple compared to the oranges of big research-based UK universities. It is a good school that also has some of the exclusivity and upper-class vibes a lot of Americans want.
To the person bashing Manchester: it is where man first split the atom, where Alan Turing first explored AI, where countless Noble Prize winning scientists have studied or taught. But it is more like a strong state school in the US, without upper-class cache in a very class-center culture. |
I think a lot of people would agree that Wisconsin and Illinois should rank higher than Dartmouth and Brown. |
It includes global, sure, but only as an after thought. |
Only visible difference between Oxford and SA is location for more opportunities . However, for undergraduate, SA is a better choice. |