You are missing an important point! They won't be able to afford that neighborhood which means they have to move again! |
Wrong, pp. Newsflash: you already have disruptive little shits in your kid's school. They might not have brown skin, so maybe you haven't noticed. Why can't you understand that you won't have hundreds of kids from the shelter in your school? Babies and toddlers don't go to school. |
They may be leading the protests (and frankly many legitimate concerns have been cited) but don't go around suggesting crazy things, like it's because of "fear of brown toddlers" - that's completely wrong and completely out of line. |
Who is they? What do you mean by permanent housing? Are they planning on building public housing in Ward 3 next? |
Reading Is Fundamental ;0) They might get a generous rental subsidy to stay in that neighborhood...particularly if DC pilots a program and studies how these families do in a better hood (like the MoCo study). They might engage local landlords and pilot a permanent housing rental subsidy. They might develop transitional (unlikely) or permanent (more likely) housing in the area. |
Why can't you understand that babies and toddlers grow up, and there's no guarantee that the homeless families will overcome current problems and dysfunctionality - in fact many won't. Some of these families will be dependent on shelters and help for years, maybe even entire lifetimes. |
So public housing as said before. |
It's only going to work in units where there are designated low-income rental units. Outside of that, landlords in many of these areas will be looking for premium dollars. I'm pretty sure rent subsidies only cover so much, and they won't be able to cover the difference. |
Why not crazy housing in affordable safe neighborhoods that creating public housing in wealthier neighborhoods? Seems odd. Besides crime was up in MoCo last year - rapes and murders were up. |
Wow, you are all over the place! Babies and toddlers will not grow up fast enough to enroll in your school if they are in this temporary family shelter. They are aiming for a two month turnover. So that's not a real issue. Yes, breaking the cycle of poverty takes a lot. The best way to break the cycle is to permanently house these families in great neighborhoods with great schools. Then they have a chance. Data supports this...including the MoCo study. But you seem to think the best approach is to leave them in the ghetto...so as not to offend you. Let's explore that. What does that say about you? Would you say that out loud? Would you say this to your boss? On a stage at a public forum? |
You do realize that homeless FAMILIES don't rape and murder people, right? Fear the brown toddlers!!! That should be your rallying cry. |
Agree - there are both positive and negative influences. It also has a lot to do with infrastructure, logistics, planning and very robust social supports. You can't just transplant a family into yuppieville and somehow magic just happens all by itself. That's another part of the equation that's missing. Plus there's also a lot of demographic and cultural factors, for example plenty of AAs who visibly recoil at white yuppie SWPL culture and aren't at all interested in modeling that. |
A lot of bad stuff happens among the homeless. Anyone remember Relisha Rudd? |
http://www.bethesdamagazine.com/Bethesda-Beat/2015/Police-Statistics-Murders-Rapes-Increased-in-Montgomery-County-in-2015/ |
Um, I think that's what DC is trying to avoid by placing families in a safe emergency shelter and then rapidly transitioning them to their own apartment, Dumbass. |