| Sorry, I pasted that backwards....too tired. |
Yes, please! |
lol it will go to the senate next and need 60 votes You think Schumer and the 8 will let that happen?
|
I believe that’s already been documented. |
AI The recent Jeffrey Epstein emails released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee did not originate from a single source, but rather from Jeffrey Epstein's own email accounts and the accounts of his various associates, lawyers, and journalists he communicated with. These emails were part of over 20,000 pages of documents obtained by the committee after it subpoenaed Epstein's estate. |
Every democrat will vote in favor. If you think otherwise you are a moron |
Um, yes: https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/10/congress/chuck-schumer-senate-epstein-vote-00555454 |
It’s performative, since they know it will never become law(ie, the Senate, Trump will see to that). But at least it reveals cracks in the orange clown’s power. (We have known for a long time that republican votes are based upon keeping their jobs, not their integrity) |
Why does this need to go to the senate? It isn't a law, it is a disposition of assets held by and controlled by the House of Representatives. |
There is substantial informationheld by the banking regulators, the SEC, intelligence agencies, etc. |
|
The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.
Why? |
You seem nice. And you’re not paying attention. |
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/10/congress/chuck-schumer-senate-epstein-vote-00555454 |
Huh? This is about the Epstein files that DOJ has. The House does not have the files. |
The Times didn’t have these emails. |