Where's positive abortion story thread from off topic yesterday?

[Anonymous]

Had a few responses turn disappeared

[Anonymous]

Then

[jsteele]

It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

But that was the title of the blog post wth?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

That's a good description of your thread.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

That's a good description of your thread.

Doesn't everyone have a bias? But it's not censored to fit ones own agenda.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

That's a good description of your thread.

Doesn't everyone have a bias? But it's not censored to fit ones own agenda.

It's more the "ulterior motive" part that was the problem. That and now the fact that you are simply being a pain in the ass. Censorship is what the government does. When someone posts a thread titled "positive abortion story", posts a link to a story that is not a positive abortion story, doesn't offer any worthwhile commentary on the topic, and the thread gets removed, that's moderation. You were basically attempting to mislead people to viewing a story that most of them wouldn't chose to read. That's trolling.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

That's a good description of your thread.

Doesn't everyone have a bias? But it's not censored to fit ones own agenda.

It's more the "ulterior motive" part that was the problem. That and now the fact that you are simply being a pain in the ass. Censorship is what the government does. When someone posts a thread titled "positive abortion story", posts a link to a story that is not a positive abortion story, doesn't offer any worthwhile commentary on the topic, and the thread gets removed, that's moderation. You were basically attempting to mislead people to viewing a story that most of them wouldn't chose to read. That's trolling.

No I was saying that people spin it as positive (like the woman in the story, saying how great it was ), but it wasn't positive as seen by the images. As they were warned they'd be. Interesting how you get to keep what fits your own beliefs but delete what doesn't.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It was basically a troll thread. It was simply a link to a webpage that wasn't a positive abortion story.

Totally bias and ulterior motive.

That's a good description of your thread.

Doesn't everyone have a bias? But it's not censored to fit ones own agenda.

It's more the "ulterior motive" part that was the problem. That and now the fact that you are simply being a pain in the ass. Censorship is what the government does. When someone posts a thread titled "positive abortion story", posts a link to a story that is not a positive abortion story, doesn't offer any worthwhile commentary on the topic, and the thread gets removed, that's moderation. You were basically attempting to mislead people to viewing a story that most of them wouldn't chose to read. That's trolling.

No I was saying that people spin it as positive (like the woman in the story, saying how great it was ), but it wasn't positive as seen by the images. As they were warned they'd be. Interesting how you get to keep what fits your own beliefs but delete what doesn't.

Why do you keep trying to make this about me? Here is the simple fact: your post had a misleading subject. The text of your message did nothing to clarify the misleading nature of your post. You were trying to trick people into clicking on your link. There are plenty of anti-choice threads here. You are welcome to start your own. But just make sure you engage in truth in advertising.

[Anonymous]

Jeff, thanks for deleting this thread. It was misleading and it was really a video not in very good taste.