Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Little pink monster blog
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
She probably came up to help her. This woman was used to nannies when she had money. You can’t expect her to take care of one baby alone, she is a sahm you know. Though, it may be to keep her clean. Not sure how much she can lean on her husband, he might be fragile too. |
Anonymous
Lots of people have family help out. My MIL watched my kid the first year of his life and she did it for free. I offered some sort of compensation but she refused. Does that make me a horrible person? No, just lucky I have family that loves us and vice versa. I'm sure it's the same with N's sister |
Anonymous
| Natasha and kane never had nannies help them. Lol. Her sister is going to school in DC, so they hang together. Something wrong with that? You people are ridiculous. |
Anonymous
I have a feeling she knows because it’s Natasha who wrote this. |
Anonymous
No, she did have nannies only she called them sitters. Except they were the type sitters who did things like take care of your kids while you are around and take them to activities while you papier-mâché at home. You know, the kind also known as nannies. |
Anonymous
| It seems like the sister lives with them, she’s always in their day to day pics. I love my family but I’m not driving from DC to MD every day to see them. I get babies can be overwhelming but when you don’t have a job and you find time for arts and crafts, I think you should be able to handle an infant. |
Anonymous
She’d have to have custody of the kids for child support, I think we can all agree that she doesn’t have that. I don’t think it’s even 50/50. Knowing Natasha I wouldn’t be surprised if she got knocked up again right around the time her son gets old enough that she’d have no excuse not to work. You do you honey! |
Anonymous
|
If N had even 50/50 custody she’d be sure to point it out (ie I miss them so much but at least they’re here for 3 days, blah blah blah). She has danced around acknowledging how much she has them... ie saying the girls were at school during an aquarium trip - yes, technically true, but were they going home with you that day? Not likely. Someone on ig asked her if kane has full custody and she said “No.” without elaborating. If she had 50/50 she definitely would’ve said that then.
If the rumors of where she met her husband are true (won’t say it since all mentions of it are deleted, but we all know what’s up and why she disappeared) I’m not surprised she doesn’t have custody. |
Anonymous
| Natasha didnt even have her kids when she went to visit the aquarium, so not sure why she said they were in school, like she has them. Kane has them...see, this is where she shouldn't say anything about them. Its ok to visit places without them.... |
Anonymous
No, I think I'm in the minority with how little (none!) help I got from family with my littles. Absolutely nothing wrong with it. I'm envious, with no ire or hate, of her setup. |
Anonymous
This is what bothers me about her. Why even mention the kids. She’s shady. |
Anonymous
| Why does she post old photos and act as if the girls are with her most days when we know they’re not? Just be real!!!! If she was honest about everything she’d get some respect. |
Anonymous
| Ok yeah she's starting to get a little annoying with all of these vague posts about the "negative circumstances" she has to deal with daily and her new "yummy" life (whatever that means). If she truly had 50/50 custody she would come right out and say it since she feels the need to constantly reference her issues with Kane and her kids. She wouldn't allow the public to continue to think she was an unfit mother. It's pretty clear that something happened where she was out of the picture for months and while I understand her decision to keep it under wraps she's starting to come across as desperate to portray a certain image. I guess it makes sense though--you can't be a Mommy Blogger if people think you barely have custody of your kids (even if that's the reality of the situation)! |
Anonymous
Not necessarily, you forget we don't know what the NDA says. There's also the fact that she may just not want to put it out there as everyone's business. |
Anonymous
Sincere question, how do we know she doesn't? There's been a ton of speculation here but not a lot of actual proof, about most everything with this family. |