SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Witkoff was in Moscow when he was added to the chat - he might have even been in the Kremlin. If they're doing everything on Signal, then Russia has God Knows What info from Witkoff's phone.

That’s a huge breach then.

This is really bad. Lord knows what that man had on his phone. Putin must be laughing his head off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has full confidence in Waltz. IOW, he's out by Friday.

When will Trump have full confidence in Hesgeth? When he returns? Or before that?

Walz needs to go.
But let’s face it, the intel reps also know better as should hegseth. They should resign.

I tell myself that I should quit, but I don’t listen to drunks.*

*top country lyric that’s fitting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump has full confidence in Waltz. IOW, he's out by Friday.

When will Trump have full confidence in Hesgeth? When he returns? Or before that?

Nah--....Trump doesn't fire people for incompetence or recklessness or for harming American citizens. He only fires them for disloyalty to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s noteworthy that the usual MAGA apologists in this forum have not weighed in to defend this indefensible breach of national security.

They are just hoping everyone gallops on to the next stupidity.

The sad part is that everyone knows this isn’t the end of the stupidity and to expect something else in the near future.

[Anonymous]

So who was Waltz intending to add when he added Goldberg by mistake? My guess is Gorka and the app autofilled Goldberg instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

You're just mad this didn't happen under Biden's watch so you could dry-hump it for the rest of your life to receive infinite pleasure.

[Anonymous]

The intel hearings had best be made for TV this week. Both GOP and Dems need to hold these reckless excuses accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The deep state clearly manipulated the signal feed to add a left wing reporter to embarrass the administration. Meanwhile Doge discovered who is leaking at the Pentagon and polygraphs are commencing this week. The deep state is wide and vindictive.

Reading this I feel a flicker of hope, but nah!

Seeing as no one is more vindictive than Trump, we know that he is the deep state. And it’s why we also know the country deeply in crisis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?

Except this is not about a journalist.

The only story here is the reckless disregard the principals committee has for our national security.

[Anonymous]

Trump is officially standing by Waltz. But it’s still possible he’ll get Waltz to resign if the press coverage gets to be too much for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who was Waltz intending to add when he added Goldberg by mistake? My guess is Gorka and the app autofilled Goldberg instead.

It also could have been US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Goldberg has said that he goes by "JG" on Signal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?

He also could have done what I have done at work when I have received something I should not receive and that is to contact someone and say I believe I received this by accident. No he is thinking he will get a book or a million speaking engagements. I am sure also exaggerating as well. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?

He also could have done what I have done at work when I have received something I should not receive and that is to contact someone and say I believe I received this by accident. No he is thinking he will get a book or a million speaking engagements. I am sure also exaggerating as well. Sad.

If you had read the article, you would have understood that he thought that it was a misinformation campaign attempt. He didn't think it was real until the actual attacks happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?

He also could have done what I have done at work when I have received something I should not receive and that is to contact someone and say I believe I received this by accident. No he is thinking he will get a book or a million speaking engagements. I am sure also exaggerating as well. Sad.

Well. If these are the MAGA talking points, they’re very weak. Try again.