EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

No I didn't which is why I asked. Your original comment wasn't talking about the downsides of greek life, but it being easier for her get in because of her status. That can be true, but it doesn't take away from it still being a great opportunity she decided to take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

No I didn't which is why I asked. Your original comment wasn't talking about the downsides of greek life, but it being easier for her get in because of her status. That can be true, but it doesn't take away from it still being a great opportunity she decided to take.

So you are aware of downsides but automatically assumed it was only upside. We know you don't know Zahara and are only making assumptions about her life. The downsides are just as likely as upsides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

None of them want Pitt. Some of them have dropped his last name. She stopped working to raise them and appears to have done a wonderful job. Does she have help? Sure. So do I, and I am far from rich and famous. That doesn’t mean she is not involved in their upbringing.

I find it sad how critical women are of other women, esp. when the other woman happens to be gorgeous.

Perhaps it has something to do with her having affairs and marriages with men who are spoken for. No woman likes a woman like that.

You see, I have a problem with a man like that, sure. But Angelina was single and I don’t hold her accountable to the cheating HE did. Pitt probably told her his marriage was over, and it likely was.

Wasn’t just Pitt/Aniston she did this to

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

What kind of creative writing lol. It's coming up because it came up while they were doing their winery negotiations. There's no way around it.

Abuse has nothing to do with Miraval.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is nutty. Plus she steals other wives men. Dirtbag. Brad is smart to on from her.

Mentally ill with severe daddy issues. Every guy she's targeted has been married or engaged. It's some weird fixation, source of pride, for her to screw a guy already committed to someone else. One of "those women".

She had a drug problem. She used to make out with her own brother. She was bat-sh*t crazy with Billy Bob (who was engaged to Laura Dern and blindsided when Angie moved in).

She constantly reinvents herself, so much so it feels like an act. The vixen Angie, the Mother Theresa Angie, The Red cross Angie, etc, etc. She severely lacked empathy along with Brad when right as he left Aniston--literally right after he left-- they took out a full page Vogue magazine spread posing as a family with kids.

It's hard to really believe anything with a person with that track record. It could be true, who knows...but somebody that has shown they are dishonest to begin with, willing to cheat and treat people with zero empathy...

I always think JA was the lucky one in this sh*t show. That traveling gypsy freak show and chaos---and then the implosion---Jen has close friends and a life.

Angie needs $ and was selling art work, etc.

And Brad's mother and family absolutely loved Jen. Mom was still hanging out with and calling her after the divorce.

So what? Brad's mother, the counselor, raised him to be the druggie, drunk, emotionally and physically abusive husband and father he is. Because yes, being drugged and drunk all the time in a marriage and as a dad is ABUSIVE. And because he admits those things, I have zero qualms believing not only Jolie but also one of the kids who has publicly asserted he was physically abusive.

The Pitt fan club in this thread is gross. I'm no big fan of Jolie as an actor, I acknowledge she is more than a little bit weird and I find her actions unsurprising considering her messed up childhood - but for the record Aniston had a similarly messed up childhood and her parents were both failures at some level, which explains them both being attracted to an addict narcissist like Pitt.

As for the kids - they don't seem any worse or better than any other celebrity kids. As someone else mentioned, neither parent has a college degree - Pitt dropped out only two credits short of completion, how stupid is that? - so there isn't parental pressure to go that path if they aren't ready or don't want it. Why is that a bad thing? A lot of parent pressure their kids to go to college when they aren't ready or sure what they want and many of those kids go deeply into student loan debt in the process. These kids have wealthy parents and are being given space to figure out who they are - there is nothing wrong with that except from the perspective of driven DCUM parents whose kids probably never had space to breathe and just be after kindergarten.

Maybe Jolie isn't a great parent, but she gets kudos for putting her parenting above all else since the divorce.

So many threads on here with women and men wondering about their dating prospects post divorce often when they haven't even left the marriage yet - people who still have minor children to raise.

I don't know why divorced people with minor children are dating at all - especially divorced women. But then, I spent years working in law enforcement and as a child advocate and I know the statistics on who it is that perpetrates most abuse of all kinds on children - outside of the parents themselves, the primary abusers of children are stepparents and/or boyfriend or girlfriend of the parents.

Jolie is putting her kids ahead of her love life, so she has clearly matured from the foolish young woman everyone keeps seeing her as so many years later. She has often said that becoming a parent changed her life utterly - as so many parents say. She thought she found a worthy dad for her kids in Pitt, and she learned the hard way that he wasn't really. Now she's focused on the kids and hasn't even really dated. And yet she's being vilified.

Hypocrisy.

All of this!!! I don't even like Angelina and only know so much about their kids now because this thread made me curious. The kids are doing fine and finding their own paths so I am going defend them. That's rare of nepo kids of that level of fame. It does reflect nicely on her and that obviously we think she's a perfect parent. For goodness sake her daughter had pink hair abd she literally produced her daughter's favorite musical so she can have experience. Can't get anymore permissive and gentle parenting then that, but lots of people have found balance with that so I can't judge since we don't know really how she parents.

If Jolie’s allegations were true of multiple years of abuse then the kids would be messed up. Another indication her allegations are false.

This is a total crap statement that only reveals how little you know about the dynamics of child abuse.

Many people who experience childhood trauma in the form of witnessing domestic violence and being victim of emotional neglect or physical or sexual abuse go on to be very high achievers in adult life.

Every person responds differently but surviving abuse and trauma in early childhood can lead to great resiliency in many kids who are driven to succeed at high levels.

But that doesn’t mean they aren’t also ‘messed up’ - voluminous research on the subject has established the link between a high ACE (adverse childhood experiences) score and long term health problems inclusive of mental illness, substance use disorders, and a myriad of chronic illness. Women who experience trauma in childhood are at a much higher risk of developing obesity - the risk increases with the number of traumas experienced.

How many threads have been posted on this board in just the last year referring to highly successful adults whose lives begins splintering in midlife due to unresolved childhood trauma that manifests in relationship problems, substance use disorder, sexual dysfunction, infidelity, mental illness, etc.

You seem to have very stunted thinking on this issue. You think all abused kids go straight into criminality and deviancy? Two thirds of children experience trauma in childhood, much of it happens in the loving embrace of the family of origin. Our prisons are crowded, but not that crowded.

An abused child can achieve great things, and still spend their whole life grappling with the consequences of their experiences of abuse.

I wish we could like comments on here but you have the patience of an angel for writing this all out.

Thank you for the compliment poster.

It is easy for me to write about these things and doesn’t take much time because this stuff is written in my DNA.

My experiences as a child (my ACEs score is 8/10) abused in the family of origin in all the ways a child can be abused drove me to both experience all the negative manifestations of early childhood abuse (low self esteem and lack of confidence, promiscuity, stunted educational achievement - HS drop out - early out of wedlock pregnancy, substance use disorder, mental health issues, chronic physical illness, difficulty in intimate relationships) and also drove me to very high achievement academically and professionally in my adult life.

It also drove me to dedicate my entire adult life to working in advocacy on behalf of victims of abuse and I have decades of experience and training on dynamics of child abuse and domestic violence - beginning with the first research paper I ever wrote in HS on child abuse and culminating in years as a prosecutor putting domestic abusers in prison as often as I could.

I’m driven. Many children who were abused are very driven people as adults. In recent years I have begun to openly express my childhood experiences with some close friends and in some professional settings, but for decades of my life I would never speak of it, could not even speak of it in therapy which kept me stunted for years. But that is not unusual because abused children are often beaten into the brainwashing of NEVER speaking of the abuse outside the confines of the abusive family - and not to speak of it there, either! I’ve suffered crippling anxiety and self esteem issues my whole life but on the few occasions I mentioned my insecurity to mentors or peers I was met with incredulity- abused children also become incredibly adept at masking as a means of survival.

The poster who thinks that the Jolie-Pitt kids are all okay because at still tender ages they haven’t yet shown public signs of breakdown is just a damned fool. This world is full of very broken people who look entirely intact on the outside - the majority of intelligent mature people know this to be true. Some of you are only just beginning to realize in midlife that you are married to such a person, a broken survivor.

Quite obviously Jolie herself is one such broken person who exhibited her brokenness more openly - while also being simultaneously high achieving.

I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that Pitt was also a formerly abused child, because the vast majority of people with the kind of issues he’s openly exhibited and acknowledged have some kind of trauma in their background. Chronic drug and alcohol addiction is a sure sign of self medicating mental illness. Engaging in coercive control and violence in familial relationships is often - though not always - re-enacting the model of relationships you witnessed in your own family of origin. And no, the fact that Aniston didn’t experience that side of Pitt doesn’t mean he’s innocent. Many domestic abusers don’t manifest abuse of that nature until the pressures of marriage with parenting trigger them- how many times have we seen that described in threads on this forum?

. If there was massive abuse we would be seeing problems with the kids by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

None of them want Pitt. Some of them have dropped his last name. She stopped working to raise them and appears to have done a wonderful job. Does she have help? Sure. So do I, and I am far from rich and famous. That doesn’t mean she is not involved in their upbringing.

I find it sad how critical women are of other women, esp. when the other woman happens to be gorgeous.

Jolie strikes me as they type who will guilt trip her kids if they try to have a relationship with their dad. I suspect the kids, maybe not the 2 eldest boys, will choose to have a relationship with Brad when they are older and she will voice her displeasure.

She has already been warned about parent alienation by the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

None of them want Pitt. Some of them have dropped his last name. She stopped working to raise them and appears to have done a wonderful job. Does she have help? Sure. So do I, and I am far from rich and famous. That doesn’t mean she is not involved in their upbringing.

I find it sad how critical women are of other women, esp. when the other woman happens to be gorgeous.

Jolie strikes me as they type who will guilt trip her kids if they try to have a relationship with their dad. I suspect the kids, maybe not the 2 eldest boys, will choose to have a relationship with Brad when they are older and she will voice her displeasure.

She seems like a mind fkkkkkkwer to me. Someone that will do anything to get kids turned against their father. She’s mentally ill. Shiloh started seeking Brad out.

Yep…I can see her guilt tripping those kids. Tell them how much she sacrificed for them…gave up her career, ended her marriage etc. But I believe the kids will have a relationship with Brad.

Pax was with the Pitt family celebrating Brad’s mother’s birthday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

No I didn't which is why I asked. Your original comment wasn't talking about the downsides of greek life, but it being easier for her get in because of her status. That can be true, but it doesn't take away from it still being a great opportunity she decided to take.

Definitely will help her grades. In my college the fraternities kept copies of all the test of the professors. Probably work assignments as well.

[Anonymous]

I think publicly it is easier for the kids to side with Jolie. She needs that - that the kids show solidarity with her outwardly and that they share her negativity towards Pitt.

I think privately it is a different story. I think Pitt has told them to say whatever they want publicly. He seems to have some contact with most of the kids based on their contact with his family. But he doesn't need that publicly broadcast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

None of them want Pitt. Some of them have dropped his last name. She stopped working to raise them and appears to have done a wonderful job. Does she have help? Sure. So do I, and I am far from rich and famous. That doesn’t mean she is not involved in their upbringing.

I find it sad how critical women are of other women, esp. when the other woman happens to be gorgeous.

Jolie strikes me as they type who will guilt trip her kids if they try to have a relationship with their dad. I suspect the kids, maybe not the 2 eldest boys, will choose to have a relationship with Brad when they are older and she will voice her displeasure.

She seems like a mind fkkkkkkwer to me. Someone that will do anything to get kids turned against their father. She’s mentally ill. Shiloh started seeking Brad out.

Yep…I can see her guilt tripping those kids. Tell them how much she sacrificed for them…gave up her career, ended her marriage etc. But I believe the kids will have a relationship with Brad.

Pax was with the Pitt family celebrating Brad’s mother’s birthday.

Link or lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think publicly it is easier for the kids to side with Jolie. She needs that - that the kids show solidarity with her outwardly and that they share her negativity towards Pitt.

I think privately it is a different story. I think Pitt has told them to say whatever they want publicly. He seems to have some contact with most of the kids based on their contact with his family. But he doesn't need that publicly broadcast.

They can have a relationship with his family while having an estranged one with him. Why would his family be punished for his actions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like to think I have a pretty good ability to read toxic people.

I think Brad is a narcissist abuser and Angelina wants him to be held accountable for everything she endured

I think the kids are pretty great, and each one is encouraged to be themselves.

People talking about Angelina's past have no idea what she's like today. Why even bring it up.

ITA with this. She’s a strong woman and hates it that people think that she suffered abuse because “who would abuse someone so hot/rich/whatever”. She sold herself as a badass woman and ended up with an abuser.

Brad’s a narcissist who took what he wanted and preyed on the exact insecurity/ issues posters here are blaming her for- but he did it 20 years ago when she actually acted kind of crazy.

Brad probably shamed her because of her public reputation- “who’s going to believe you you’re crazy”- so she feels extra fervent about revealing the truth of who she is and what happened to her. High value high target empaths or women with BPD/unstable childhoods/other mental or addiction issues are a narcs prime target. Makes them look better and they can demean them until they destroy them in private.

There comes a time of maturity where after 8 years you walk away. They are legally divorced, financial implications may be still on-going, the kids are at the age to decide who they want to be with or live with, so what’s the point in continuing the allegations?

She has full custody. They cannot choose who they want to live with till they are 18 adults. Both parents have plenty of money. Her continuing to create drama speaks volumes and who knows what hard she's done to these kids. But, her lifestyle choices and parenting choices for those kids don't seem healthy at all.

I can tell you arent on twitter because they have a bunch of the court documents on there. She doesn't have sole custody. Shes the primary custodians he has visitations. The kids can chose who they want to live with now if they want too as well.

That's basically sole custody if he only has visits. No they cannot choose. He'd have to go to court and become the primary parent.

No it's not and that's not true lol. If one of the kids wanted to live with him and she was stopping it, he would have to file a custody modification.

Perhaps she keeps bringing up the abuse because the kids want to live with Pitt. With the youngest being 15, they can now make the court listen to where they want to live. This makes the most sense to me as to why she is still fighting.


“Age Requirements For Expressing Parental Preference

As a child grows older, their input regarding custody decisions may become more valuable. In California, children cannot choose where to live until they are 18 years old, but their preferences may be taken into account in custody decisions.If a child is 14 years or older, the court must listen to their opinion regarding where they would like to live unless it is deemed not in their best interest. Factors considered include the age and maturity of the child, as well as the stability of each parent's living environment.”

None of them want Pitt. Some of them have dropped his last name. She stopped working to raise them and appears to have done a wonderful job. Does she have help? Sure. So do I, and I am far from rich and famous. That doesn’t mean she is not involved in their upbringing.

I find it sad how critical women are of other women, esp. when the other woman happens to be gorgeous.

Jolie strikes me as they type who will guilt trip her kids if they try to have a relationship with their dad. I suspect the kids, maybe not the 2 eldest boys, will choose to have a relationship with Brad when they are older and she will voice her displeasure.

She seems like a mind fkkkkkkwer to me. Someone that will do anything to get kids turned against their father. She’s mentally ill. Shiloh started seeking Brad out.

Yep…I can see her guilt tripping those kids. Tell them how much she sacrificed for them…gave up her career, ended her marriage etc. But I believe the kids will have a relationship with Brad.

Pax was with the Pitt family celebrating Brad’s mother’s birthday.

They actually went over to Angelina's house. That happened in 2020 or 2019

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

No I didn't which is why I asked. Your original comment wasn't talking about the downsides of greek life, but it being easier for her get in because of her status. That can be true, but it doesn't take away from it still being a great opportunity she decided to take.

So you are aware of downsides but automatically assumed it was only upside. We know you don't know Zahara and are only making assumptions about her life. The downsides are just as likely as upsides.

You are very confused. There is a downside and possible cons to everything in life. Still doesn't take away from her seizing a opportunity which can provide a fulfilling experience. Even moreso since it's black all woman school. That will be valuable for self

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not a good mom. She puts her kids in her drama and media. She did not give them a real education and dragged them to her work. Her needs and wishes came first.

And poor ole pitt had no say 🙄🙄 The more I look these kids up because of your comments, the more impressed I am at how grounded they are with all things considering. earlier last year shiloh did several dance camps out the country and I see zahara is now AKA sister. Awesome for them.

Why is this a good thing? Because of who her parents are, any sorority she expressed interest in would admit her; it’s not like she is a nobody pledge.

Joining a sorority can very fulfilling. How is that not a good thing for her?

It's like you've never heard of hazing, drinking and the partying culture associated with sororities. They're not all the same but don't be so naive.

As you said they're not all the same. I partied but it wasn't the only thing we did at my sorority. It's a great opportunity for network and can provide valuable experiences for her.

They don't play dumb about "why?" You know why.

No I didn't which is why I asked. Your original comment wasn't talking about the downsides of greek life, but it being easier for her get in because of her status. That can be true, but it doesn't take away from it still being a great opportunity she decided to take.

Definitely will help her grades. In my college the fraternities kept copies of all the test of the professors. Probably work assignments as well.

That's what they did at my sorority as well. They were strict about us maintaining a high GPA. We partied but we couldn't party too hard. It kept me accountable and I am thankful for that.