Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kate signed up for this. She knew he (any future male child) would be sent to eton. There’s no “we’ll discuss this later” in the royal family. I’m not saying I’d ever want my kid there either but dang, she would be acting desperate and immature if this was all about Eton.
Why would you assume George would go to Eton? King Charles did not go there.

Only because Philip put his foot down. And it appears William is not willing to budge on this, if reports are true.


Oh!! Reports, plural ?? Oh!!!

Please share unless of course those reports were created by reporters on this thread….
Anonymous
First, I hate that I’m thinking about this (shakes fist at universe for the internets)!

So Occum’s razor in order of likelihood:

1) K did have major surgery and is pumped full of steroids making her swell viscously and as a public figure nearly exclusively lauded for her beauty, she feels psychologically unable to be seen like that. Against: proof of life could include an audio message expressing her regret at doctoring the image. Done. Media storm over. She’s alive. Leave the sick mom alone.

But then…. Just radio silence? Why? A single audio clip would shatter the online fever. Something bigger might explain all the oddities, which without hashing out pure speculation regarding affairs etc are truly damming and flat out weird - no conspiracy theory needed. Such as why there was not a single image of family visiting Kate in hospital except for one planned photo opp w/ William? Really… her “incredibly” close immediate family never seen even once visiting? Kate’s mom and dad MIA for over a month from public view but her sister out and about and brother on a ski trip while Kate convalesces in hospital for two weeks?!? Weird. Both pap images solitary, not a stream of pics released? Do paps actually take a single image of a moving car? They don’t. Strong case for both pap pics being fakes. If paps wanted images of Carole Middleton out and about as she helps her daughter’s family while she recuperate at home, we would have them in spades. Or William at back entrance of hospital daily. Easy. Clearly, there has been a deal struck for privacy w/ UK media and an expectation they not bite the hand that feed them. So then why did they agree?

If the outlets have agreed to lie for the royals then there is an argument to be made that this crisis is existential for the Crown and its media ecosystem. There are pics of an ambulance rushing from Sandringham to the hospital on December 28. Kate was reportedly at that location for the holiday so it might well have been her in that motorcade that evening. What illness could be the end of the crown? A repeat of Diana’s nightmare. Could this have involved self-harm? Honestly, I just can’t think of any other illness that would warrant this kind of media lockdown and absolute vanishing. Everyone falls ill. That is in fact sympathy generating. Perhaps they don’t trust Kate to say what they need her to say? The worldwide media frenzy could be shutdown in a minute if they were capable of doing so. Apparently, they are not. I hope she’s just bloated though. If so, their entire PR department needs to be fired yesterday.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
I am really curious why her family is so quiet.If she really was recovering, they would have verified that by now, and everyone would believe them. But if she is in danger, why wouldn’t they speak up?


Speak up to whom?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The doctored pics really are the most troubling aspect. They felt the need to get an image out there, but absolutely could not use a real one for whatever reason. This is suspicious. With all this speculation, they would force her to take a real photo if they could. She would likely want to in order to kill all the rumors and protect her children from them. Even if she does have a puffy face, colostomy bag, or whatever. It could be subtle so tgat they wouldn’t have to refer to this chaos - such as mentioning a current event. She could even send her well wishes to the king in light of his cancer diagnosis.

I am really curious why her family is so quiet.If she really was recovering, they would have verified that by now, and everyone would believe them. But if she is in danger, why wouldn’t they speak up?


Exactly. Kate does respect and honor her role. She would help quell the rumors regardless of how she looks as it's now damaging KP's credibility. She's not willing to work with them so something serious is happening outside of health issues
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They are very reluctant to respond to conspiracy theories. Otherwise they would be doing this all day long.


+1000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I am really curious why her family is so quiet.If she really was recovering, they would have verified that by now, and everyone would believe them. But if she is in danger, why wouldn’t they speak up?


Speak up to whom?


Why, to the rescuers on this thread! Don’t you see how motivated these chicks are to save Kate from William and Camilla and (insert others at whim)?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Calling it now. After Easter, it’ll be announced that they’ve divorced.


Not a chance.

I don’t understand why so many posters believe stories from tabloids.

Think about how impossible it would be for them to keep secrets about living apart, cheating, DV, etc. They are never alone; they have servants and staff and protection and paparazzi.


Are you so gullible?

You don’t know about the deal btw the rota and the BRF??

NP who is new to the Royal drama. Can you explain what this is?


This explains a lot

https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfeed-news-former-royals-reporter-on-kate-middleton-palace-press-and-distrust-in-the-media/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

That was an extremely reputable journalist standing by her sources….
Check out video from ambulances from Sandringham night of Dec 28.,..

So much doesn’t fit…


No, her writing career is built on conspiracy theories:

"Calleja claims to have covered the royal family for 27 years. According to her website, she has written two books about Princess Diana, one of which is an investigation into the conspiracy theory that the beloved royal was murdered. [Ed. note: Another one of Calleja’s books suggests Michael Jackson was murdered.]"
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfeed-news-former-royals-reporter-on-kate-middleton-palace-press-and-distrust-in-the-media/

Conspiracy theory
"A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that asserts the existence of a conspiracy by powerful and sinister groups, often political in motivation, when other explanations are more probable."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

Why some people are willing to believe conspiracy theories
"The researchers found that overall, people were motivated to believe in conspiracy theories by a need to understand and feel safe in their environment and a need to feel like the community they identify with is superior to others. .... The researchers also found that people with certain personality traits, such as a sense of antagonism toward others and high levels of paranoia, were more prone to believe conspiracy theories. Those who strongly believed in conspiracy theories were also more likely to be insecure, paranoid, emotionally volatile, impulsive, suspicious, withdrawn, manipulative, egocentric and eccentric."
https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2023/06/why-people-believe-conspiracy-theories
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They are very reluctant to respond to conspiracy theories. Otherwise they would be doing this all day long.


lmao the photo is a conspiracy KP created themselves. Not owning and just continuing to lie about it is shameful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They are very reluctant to respond to conspiracy theories. Otherwise they would be doing this all day long.


lmao the photo is a conspiracy KP created themselves. Not owning and just continuing to lie about it is shameful.


It was definitely a misstep, but they apologized and owned it. Why is it so hard to believe that Kate did that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:247 pages!!! Is this the longest DCUM thread ever?


not even close
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kate signed up for this. She knew he (any future male child) would be sent to eton. There’s no “we’ll discuss this later” in the royal family. I’m not saying I’d ever want my kid there either but dang, she would be acting desperate and immature if this was all about Eton.

I agree.

In the peasant or even DCUM world, it’s like dating a guy whose family has a beach house and spend every Fourth of July there, marrying, then being mad you’ll be expected at the beach in July.


+1 to be expected they would go to boarding school


I think the fact that she signed up for this suggests the Eton theory is wrong. Like someone 100 pages back stated, she seems like she was build in a lab for this life. No way would she throw such a public fit about something totally expected, no matter how displeased she was about it.


She’s allowed to change her mind.

And she didn’t have a little boy of her own then or realize the potential abuses at a boarding school.


She had issues at boarding school herself. So, not naive.

She has no leverage if he wants her out. The tone of her coverage has markedly changed, not a coincidence. He has stopped referring to her at appearances. He has used his solo letterhead. She was thrown under the bus re: the photo that in all likelihood was a set up. She had nothing to do with it and likely does not have access to their social media accounts. It was a dig at her prior competent/asset image and a dig at the hobby she is well known for. Stories painting her as volatile and throwing things started to run last year, portraying them as "equally bad."

Whether it is about a 3rd party or not remains to be seen. He is not even faking being a doting, protective husband at this point.

If there are differences over the kids going forward, he holds the trump cards, especially as her family's wealth has tanked.

All the cries that they can't get divorced when CHARLES is divorced as silly.


This is my line of thinking. As most marital arguments, it's just a symptom of a bigger issue. In this case they aren't on the same page anymore. They had an easy way out by just admitting it was mistake from their staff office. Putting it on Kate sent a nasty message.


My sense is that Charles was kinder and more deferential to Diana re: the children than William will be (in part due to trauma/damage from Diana's mental illness during his childhood, William is not going to share power this round). It's more than the marriage seeming broken, it's that the "machine" is now tarnishing her image actively, despite it being a time when the opposite would be expected by the public out of basic decency while they are claiming she is quite "ill." In fact, she may be.

It's pretty extraordinary, but if you look back there have been more negative stories placed about her for a year or so, very "both sides" (linked upthread or Google) but now she is "unstable" etc. and "wanting out" when she may be being pushed out. She has no power in the situation that I can see. William's lifelong anger may have found a new target. He seems unwilling to just live apart and fake it for PR anymore.


It seems like William and KP's handling Katw was a big shock for a lot of royal journalists too. As someone (maybe you?) said there's been a noticeable shift in the narrative considering Kate now. They aren't looking out for her and now okay with actively harming her image. Not collaborating might be the only way she's able to hold some control.


Actively harming her image? Look at what the dailymail just published:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13191311/Kate-Middleton-Prince-William-Kensington-photo.html


Someone needs to say it, it has been pretty shocking. Kate Middleton has been 'thrown under a bus' by 'disgraceful' Kensington officials and 'ungentlemanly' Prince William - who let her take blame for Mother's Day photo blunder, Richard Eden tells Palace Confidential

I think it is most likely that the photogate was a set up as part of the media campaign to damage her image, along with the solo letterhead and not mentioning her at events anymore. It makes William look callous and cold, but they must not care or feel a plot twist yet to come will vindicate his approach?


Guys, guys. Who wants to damage the image of both Kate-the-most-popular and William-the-heir-apparent-and-now-a-cold-and-bad-husband? Hmm?


Now you’re saying H&M control KP, Kate and William and made them do that awful photoshop and retraction?

Or are you saying Camila?
Anonymous
We are invested because Diana.
She died because the BRF screwed up.
She desperately loved her boys and although we may not like William, his kids are innocent and need their mother.
I think this thread, the analyzing, conspiracy conjectures, etc are all because of that.
We don’t want it to happen again.


Anonymous
Ambulances??? Plural? When? So, it was not a planned surgery?
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: