Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I can’t wait to hear how corrupted this is.

I'm sure it's some variation of how she never saw Trump around kids but she accidentally walked in on him with a supermodel and wow, the rumors of Trump's package are so true.

[Anonymous]

Its over dcum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another nothingburger. Lets create another 300 plus pages of hypothetic Trump connections...

was it a nothingburger when Trump said he would release the files during campaigning? He seemed to make a big deal out of it back then.

Trump also said all wars would stop in his first day in office but no truce, no unconditional surrender by any of the warring parties. The only thing you can count on to be true is that just about everything that comes out of his mouth and this administration is a lie.

[Anonymous]

WSJ on Maxwell Blanche meeting. She says she never saw Trump act inappropriately. WHEN SHE WAS WITH HIM. She wasn't we with him every second that Trump and Epstein were together!

This begs the question of what trump did when it was just Jeffie and Donnie all alone with young girls! In no way does this exonorate Trump.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/justice-department-releases-ghislaine-maxwell-interview-transcript-98cd6d7f?st=KVoufN

[Anonymous]

From the DOJ's sentencing memo in 2022:

Moreover, the record at sentencing makes clear that the defendant has engaged in a significant pattern of dishonest conduct, which speaks volumes about her character. The defendant’s record includes the following:

• In 2016, the defendant testified under oath in a civil deposition in connection with a lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts and lied repeatedly during her testimony. For example, she denied, among other things, having given Annie Farmer a massage. (PSR ¶ 75-76). As the evidence at trial established, that was a lie.

• Upon her arrest, the defendant was interviewed by Pretrial Services, and told them that the home she owned in New Hampshire was owned by a corporation, and that she was “just able to stay there.” (PSR ¶ 149). That was a lie, as were her statements to Pretrial Services about her finances. In an Order denying the defendant’s renewed application for bail, the Court remarked on the defendant’s “lack of candor” about her finances and concluded that the defendant had “misrepresent[ed] key facts to Pretrial Services and, by extension, the Court.” (PSR ¶ 172, December 28, 2020 Opinion at 14-16).

• On November 1, 2021, the Court allocuted the defendant about whether she had engaged in plea discussions with the Government. Although the Court’s question called for a yes or no answer about plea offers, the defendant elected to volunteer the following: “I have not committed any crime.” (November 1, 2021 Tr. at 113). That was a lie.

• In preparation for sentencing, the defendant was interviewed by the ProbationOffice, and she refused to provide any information about the circumstances of her marriage and, accordingly, the Probation Office was unable to verify these facts. (PSR at 145). Moreover, the defendant reported that she had almost no assets, a sharp contrast from the defendant’s earlier representation to the Court—in pursuit of bail—that she had approximately $22 million in assets. (PSR ¶ 172). In short, the defendant apparently decides when she wishes to disclose facts to the Court, and those facts shift when it serves the defendant’s interests.

Moreover, even now, at sentencing, the defendant has shown no acceptance of responsibility, and her submission fails to even mention, much less accept responsibility for, the harm she has caused her victims.
.....
In short, the defendant has lied repeatedly about her crimes, exhibited an utter failure to accept responsibility, and demonstrated repeated disrespect for the law and the Court. The defendant’s history and characteristics weigh in favor of a Guidelines sentence.
.....
Taken together with the defendant’s perjury in her civil deposition, her lies to Pretrial Services, and her blatant lies about her own weight while in BOP custody, the Court can fairly reject many of the defendant’s complaints about her conditions of confinement. Simply put, the defendant lies when it suits her. It apparently suits her to spread horror stories about her experiences in jail to the press in an attempt to garner public sympathy.

She's an intel agency-trained snake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ on Maxwell Blanche meeting. She says she never saw Trump act inappropriately. WHEN SHE WAS WITH HIM. She wasn't we with him every second that Trump and Epstein were together!

This begs the question of what trump did when it was just Jeffie and Donnie all alone with young girls! In no way does this exonorate Trump.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/justice-department-releases-ghislaine-maxwell-interview-transcript-98cd6d7f?st=KVoufN

So it doesn't exonerate anyone who was ever alone with Epstein in close proximity to the victims, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ on Maxwell Blanche meeting. She says she never saw Trump act inappropriately. WHEN SHE WAS WITH HIM. She wasn't we with him every second that Trump and Epstein were together!

This begs the question of what trump did when it was just Jeffie and Donnie all alone with young girls! In no way does this exonorate Trump.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/justice-department-releases-ghislaine-maxwell-interview-transcript-98cd6d7f?st=KVoufN

So it doesn't exonerate anyone who was ever alone with Epstein in close proximity to the victims, right?

It exonerates no one.

Blanche was very careful in wording those questions. "Did you observe . . . ", "Did you see . . . ", "Were you present when . . . "

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some have argued that all the Epstein drama in the mainstream press lately is punishment for Trump not wanting to get more involved in the war in Iran & do a full on regime change. I read that the birthday card was a warning too. NY Times also did a very detailed recent article about how Trump did not want to get involved with Iran at all but then his position slightly "shifted" in June

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/17/us/politics/trump-iran-israel-nuclear-talks.html?smid=url-share

The article also mentions how bothered Trump was by the "golden pager" gift Bibi gave him. Rightfully so! Ha. Could be taken as some sort of twisted threat.

I read that the "birthday" drawing was sent to the WSJ by Maxwell's brother as a warning to trump to give a pardon to Ghislaine or more of Epstein 's files would be e leaked. Don't remember where I read this is butput it
down as the latest conspiracy theory.l

Found link to baudy birthday greeting sent to WSJ

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/trump-epstein-link-was-maxwell-family-leak-meant-to-warn-us-president-of-damaging-material-doj-rushed-to-find-out-what-she-knows/articleshow/122993709.cms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ on Maxwell Blanche meeting. She says she never saw Trump act inappropriately. WHEN SHE WAS WITH HIM. She wasn't we with him every second that Trump and Epstein were together!

This begs the question of what trump did when it was just Jeffie and Donnie all alone with young girls! In no way does this exonorate Trump.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/justice-department-releases-ghislaine-maxwell-interview-transcript-98cd6d7f?st=KVoufN

So it doesn't exonerate anyone who was ever alone with Epstein in close proximity to the victims, right?

It exonerates no one.

Blanche was very careful in wording those questions. "Did you observe . . . ", "Did you see . . . ", "Were you present when . . . "

Not a single person connected with Epstein's is exonerated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its over dcum

What does a convicted pedophile consider “appropriate” exactly? This is a person who raped little girls. Her opinion of appropriate probably matches Trumps but not any normal persons.

[Anonymous]

Can’t prosecute on I bets, I thinks, and I believes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can’t prosecute on I bets, I thinks, and I believes

Nope. but this wasn't an evidentiary hearing. And no one in the history of criminal investigation has confined themselves to that standard when conducting an interview. This was carefully crafted by Blanche to elicit a bunch of nothingness. Let soemone who is not beholden to the Orange King do the questioning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its over dcum

What does a convicted pedophile consider “appropriate” exactly? This is a person who raped little girls. Her opinion of appropriate probably matches Trumps but not any normal persons.

Wow, I guess we aren't far away from them bringing Maxwell out at a Trump rally to roaring applause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its over dcum

What does a convicted pedophile consider “appropriate” exactly? This is a person who raped little girls. Her opinion of appropriate probably matches Trumps but not any normal persons.

She had no issue with Epstein and was his close co-conspirator in trafficking and exploiting dozens of underaged women so that's the baseline for what's "appropriate."

So her comment about "nothing inappropriate" is UTTERLY MEANINGLESS to anyone with morals and decency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its over dcum

What does a convicted pedophile consider “appropriate” exactly? This is a person who raped little girls. Her opinion of appropriate probably matches Trumps but not any normal persons.

She had no issue with Epstein and was his close co-conspirator in trafficking and exploiting dozens of underaged women so that's the baseline for what's "appropriate."

So her comment about "nothing inappropriate" is UTTERLY MEANINGLESS to anyone with morals and decency.

In fact, it would seem to confirm Trump also raped underage girls