Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate signed up for this. She knew he (any future male child) would be sent to eton. There’s no “we’ll discuss this later” in the royal family. I’m not saying I’d ever want my kid there either but dang, she would be acting desperate and immature if this was all about Eton.

I agree.

In the peasant or even DCUM world, it’s like dating a guy whose family has a beach house and spend every Fourth of July there, marrying, then being mad you’ll be expected at the beach in July.

+1 to be expected they would go to boarding school

I think the fact that she signed up for this suggests the Eton theory is wrong. Like someone 100 pages back stated, she seems like she was build in a lab for this life. No way would she throw such a public fit about something totally expected, no matter how displeased she was about it.

She’s allowed to change her mind.

And she didn’t have a little boy of her own then or realize the potential abuses at a boarding school.

She had issues at boarding school herself. So, not naive.

She has no leverage if he wants her out. The tone of her coverage has markedly changed, not a coincidence. He has stopped referring to her at appearances. He has used his solo letterhead. She was thrown under the bus re: the photo that in all likelihood was a set up. She had nothing to do with it and likely does not have access to their social media accounts. It was a dig at her prior competent/asset image and a dig at the hobby she is well known for. Stories painting her as volatile and throwing things started to run last year, portraying them as "equally bad."

Whether it is about a 3rd party or not remains to be seen. He is not even faking being a doting, protective husband at this point.

If there are differences over the kids going forward, he holds the trump cards, especially as her family's wealth has tanked.

All the cries that they can't get divorced when CHARLES is divorced as silly.

This is my line of thinking. As most marital arguments, it's just a symptom of a bigger issue. In this case they aren't on the same page anymore. They had an easy way out by just admitting it was mistake from their staff office. Putting it on Kate sent a nasty message.

[Anonymous]

Not sure why this hasn't been more of a focus of discussion

[Anonymous]

Stephen Colbert?

https://x.com/glowannelee/status/1767825264589901955

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be crazy and assume she is dead. Why the secrecy? How has nobody spilled the beans?

Let’s get crazier and assume it was William who did it and they want to spare him from prison time. Will Kate just live out a life forever in hiding? Will she disappear forever?

I mean, let’s have fun. Walk me through this.

"Let's have fun" fantasizing about a husband killing his children's mother?? No thanks.

You people are not talking about a TV series. These are real people.

And femicide is not entertainment, despite what one would think watching American TV every night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be crazy and assume she is dead. Why the secrecy? How has nobody spilled the beans?

Let’s get crazier and assume it was William who did it and they want to spare him from prison time. Will Kate just live out a life forever in hiding? Will she disappear forever?

I mean, let’s have fun. Walk me through this.

"Let's have fun" fantasizing about a husband killing his children's mother?? No thanks.

You people are not talking about a TV series. These are real people.

And femicide is not entertainment, despite what one would think watching American TV every night.

This entire thread is entertainment. Look at the name of the forum you’re in.

[Anonymous]

I never paid any attention to any of these people before photogate. Is it weird that we haven't heard a peep from the Middleton family? I get that the BRF have the "never explain" thing (though it seems they aren't exactly following it here), but what about her family of "regular" people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert?

https://x.com/glowannelee/status/1767825264589901955

I’m crying laughing. The “marching band of Chumbawamba… Almost as good as the “marionette of chlamydia”

😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert?

https://x.com/glowannelee/status/1767825264589901955

I’m crying laughing. The “marching band of Chumbawamba… Almost as good as the “marionette of chlamydia”

😂

I can’t believe the American comedic press is talking about the affair of Prince William and Rose Hanbury…. talk about mainstream.

[Anonymous]

Isn’t Kate the most popular royal? It’s going to take a heck of a lot more than the Palace trying to blame her for photoshopping the image to sway to court of public opinion. She is beloved and the public and the world are going to side with her no matter how hard they try to vilify her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One of the royal reporters says it’s time to move on, so we must be close to the truth.

Meanwhile Stephen Colbert made jokes about the Rose affair in his monologue last night.

Who is this we you speak of? Surely you don't believe they are paying attention to what randoms on DCCUM are saying?


And what truth?

Which of the following is true:

1. Kate is dead

2. William killed her.
3. He is having an affair and wants a divorce.

4. She's had an affair and got pregnant

5. William killed her lover

6. William beat her

7. Kate and the children ran away.

8. Kate is playing hardball in divorce proceedings.
9. Kate has an ED and is being forced to carry a pregnancy

Actually, royal press teams do pay attention to social media , message boards , blogs . It’s kind of their job

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert?

https://x.com/glowannelee/status/1767825264589901955

bit surprised by this!

[Anonymous]

They want her to look messy. Mentally messy, physically messy, romantically messy… I hope it won’t work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate signed up for this. She knew he (any future male child) would be sent to eton. There’s no “we’ll discuss this later” in the royal family. I’m not saying I’d ever want my kid there either but dang, she would be acting desperate and immature if this was all about Eton.

I agree.

In the peasant or even DCUM world, it’s like dating a guy whose family has a beach house and spend every Fourth of July there, marrying, then being mad you’ll be expected at the beach in July.

+1 to be expected they would go to boarding school

I think the fact that she signed up for this suggests the Eton theory is wrong. Like someone 100 pages back stated, she seems like she was build in a lab for this life. No way would she throw such a public fit about something totally expected, no matter how displeased she was about it.

She’s allowed to change her mind.

And she didn’t have a little boy of her own then or realize the potential abuses at a boarding school.

She had issues at boarding school herself. So, not naive.

She has no leverage if he wants her out. The tone of her coverage has markedly changed, not a coincidence. He has stopped referring to her at appearances. He has used his solo letterhead. She was thrown under the bus re: the photo that in all likelihood was a set up. She had nothing to do with it and likely does not have access to their social media accounts. It was a dig at her prior competent/asset image and a dig at the hobby she is well known for. Stories painting her as volatile and throwing things started to run last year, portraying them as "equally bad."

Whether it is about a 3rd party or not remains to be seen. He is not even faking being a doting, protective husband at this point.

If there are differences over the kids going forward, he holds the trump cards, especially as her family's wealth has tanked.

All the cries that they can't get divorced when CHARLES is divorced as silly.

This is my line of thinking. As most marital arguments, it's just a symptom of a bigger issue. In this case they aren't on the same page anymore. They had an easy way out by just admitting it was mistake from their staff office. Putting it on Kate sent a nasty message.

My sense is that Charles was kinder and more deferential to Diana re: the children than William will be (in part due to trauma/damage from Diana's mental illness during his childhood, William is not going to share power this round). It's more than the marriage seeming broken, it's that the "machine" is now tarnishing her image actively, despite it being a time when the opposite would be expected by the public out of basic decency while they are claiming she is quite "ill." In fact, she may be.

It's pretty extraordinary, but if you look back there have been more negative stories placed about her for a year or so, very "both sides" (linked upthread or Google) but now she is "unstable" etc. and "wanting out" when she may be being pushed out. She has no power in the situation that I can see. William's lifelong anger may have found a new target. He seems unwilling to just live apart and fake it for PR anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One of the royal reporters says it’s time to move on, so we must be close to the truth.

Meanwhile Stephen Colbert made jokes about the Rose affair in his monologue last night.

Who is this we you speak of? Surely you don't believe they are paying attention to what randoms on DCCUM are saying?


And what truth?

Which of the following is true:

1. Kate is dead

2. William killed her.
3. He is having an affair and wants a divorce.

4. She's had an affair and got pregnant

5. William killed her lover

6. William beat her

7. Kate and the children ran away.

8. Kate is playing hardball in divorce proceedings.
9. Kate has an ED and is being forced to carry a pregnancy

Actually, royal press teams do pay attention to social media , message boards , blogs . It’s kind of their job

William's recently asked Michael Corcoran to take down his tweets regarding him. Happens all the time

[Anonymous]

If she were dying surely they would be handling the pr in a much more positive way toward her, portraying William as a caring husband, etc.?