Paul Manafort Told to Surrender

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dem here that voted for Hillary. If Podesta et al did anything illegal, I hope they all get charged and prosecuted, including Hillary if there’s is any connection.

Can any Trumper say the same statement about Manafort? Why is it so hard to want justice?

Yes. If Manafort is dirty, he’s a big boy and should go down for it.

But so far none of this has to do with Trump it his campaign.

Jeff removed the Podesta link again because he’s not like you or I.

He doesn’t want his dirty people to go down. He’s happy to pitchfork and torch only the other side and cover for the Podestas.

Dirty is dirty, regardless of party.

I ask again: Did you read the Papadopoulos statement? That is *all* about the campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can tell he's cooperating b/c he pleaded guilty to just one relatively minor crime-1 count of lying to the FBI. That's negotiated between his Lawyer of the Amazing Bio and the FBI.

Yes, Trump is VERY AFRAID. He has hired Ty Cobb. Yes, that Ty Cobb's 83rd once removed cousin, so, yeah.. (LOL) Trumpnuts is hemorrhaging legal fees to a senior Hogan Lovell partner, top firm, top lawyer. Not because he expects to merely hold Justice's feet to the fire--he will--but to arrange a settlement for prison sentence time when it comes. Only a K street firm can do that. Once these things go to criminal charges, you really are toast, it's just a matter of how toasted.

It’s just an old tax issue

True. All Manafort did was evade taxes. By laundering money from a Ukrainian political party. A Ukrainian political party aligned with Russia and Putin.

So, yeah, just taxes. Sure.

So where’s the info connecting this to Trump?

In case you missed it, Manafort RAN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN while much of this was going on. It doesn't get any higher than that on a campaign, except the principal himself.

Running a campaign isn’t a crime. The assumed tax crimes occurred years before Manafort’s 3-4 month stint as Trump campaign manager. Trump fired him...wonder why?

No evidence any of Manafort’s tax crime being involved with Trump.

Podesta brothers are doing the same thing Manafort is.

I know HUNDREDS of people in DC doing what Manafort and the Podestas are doing.

Well, you better contact the FBI then.


Also, the INDICTMENTS GO THROUGH 2017, INCLUDING 2016. Maybe you will get it in caps

The FBI doesn’t care about it until they have a high stakes investigation that they need some red meat for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

And foam at the mouth about Podesta's brother

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Never mind. Trump himself told Jr. to say that the meeting was about adoptions. NBD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

PS- your fantasies don’t count as evidence or indictments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

PS- your fantasies don’t count as evidence or indictments.

I'm sorry, did I miss that Mueller has closed the investigation following these, the only indictments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

Patience grasshopper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

I think PP's controlled mirth is based on the fact that Mueeler's been in the job for approximately six months. He and his team kept a guilty plea quiet for almost a month. Manafort and Gates are in custody. Flynn is likely next. It's laughable that you are certain that the publicly announced moves are the only ones that will ever happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

Patience grasshopper. There are lot more traitors and crooks to roll up before we get to the big fish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

PS- your fantasies don’t count as evidence or indictments.

I'm sorry, did I miss that Mueller has closed the investigation following these, the only indictments?

Where's your inside info that's there more indictments? Specifically for Jr or Kushner? i know you want it to happen, but just because you want it or think it will happen doesn't make it so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

Not yet. Do you think Mueller is finished? Everything I have read so far said the "first" indictments were to come down today. I'm sure Mueller has to wonder why Trump's son and son-in-law were meeting with a money launderer (indicted) and Russian agents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see any R defending Manafort. I just see people correctly stating that this far, none of this implicates Trump.

Yes, that is true. So far, only Trump's campaign manager has been implicated. Now let's talk about that meeting with the campaign manager (indicted) and Trump's son and son in law with the Russian operatives to obtain campaign dirt! I love it!

Mueller didn’t have any indictments for Trumps son or SIL.

I'm impressed that you can type that with a straight face.

Link to indictments for Jr or Kushner?

Patience grasshopper. There are lot more traitors and crooks to roll up before we get to the big fish.

Yeah, that's why a process crime of tax evasion is the opening gambit.