Trump Campaign verbally and physically assaults Arlington Memorial staff, illegally uses site for campaigning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no way that this visit to ANC was anything but a political campaign optic. Johnson arranged Trump's visit. Cadet Bone Spur and Johnson have no respect for the dead or living members of the military.

And I’ll bet they are pissed that they’re not getting the big political “win” they were expecting.

You’ve made such a difference

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Arlington employee reported Monday's incident with the Trump campaign to police at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, the installation that oversees the cemetery, but has decided not to press charges, according to the Army's statement.

"Therefore," the statement said, "the Army considers this matter closed."

Because they don’t want further investigation.

Or because the employee who got shoved by a Trump staff doesn’t want the former president of the United States to keep calling her mentally ill and putting her name and address on his twitter so people can attack her and her family.

Or because the employee is a partisan democrat who is trying to destroy a ceremony honoring the Abbey Gate Fallen because Biden is on vacation and Kamala is taking respite and Trump was invited to memorialize the day by Gold Star Families.

If this were true, she would have pressed charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is a VERY good point. The whole thing was political from start to finish. It’s really sad.

not just that, this was the third anniversary of the Kabul attack. did Trump go to Arlington on the first or second? no. just by chance, he went on the anniversary that was 60 days before the election against an opponent who was vice president at the time of the attack. what a coincidence. something makes me think he will not remember the anniversary next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Arlington employee reported Monday's incident with the Trump campaign to police at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, the installation that oversees the cemetery, but has decided not to press charges, according to the Army's statement.

"Therefore," the statement said, "the Army considers this matter closed."

Because they don’t want further investigation.

No, because the employee in question didn't want to suffer the harassment from the MAGAs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Arlington employee reported Monday's incident with the Trump campaign to police at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, the installation that oversees the cemetery, but has decided not to press charges, according to the Army's statement.

"Therefore," the statement said, "the Army considers this matter closed."

Because they don’t want further investigation.

Or because the employee who got shoved by a Trump staff doesn’t want the former president of the United States to keep calling her mentally ill and putting her name and address on his twitter so people can attack her and her family.

Or because the employee is a partisan democrat who is trying to destroy a ceremony honoring the Abbey Gate Fallen because Biden is on vacation and Kamala is taking respite and Trump was invited to memorialize the day by Gold Star Families.

That’s your opinion as a Maga hack. The US Army has issued a statement that says something entirely different.

No, that’s reality. No democrat showed up for these families. Nobody else thinks these families are important enough.

There was not any kind of official ceremony or memorial. The family asked Trump to attend their private service, which he did. They did not ask Harris or Biden. Are you saying they should have barged in and posed in photos, standing over the graves of the fallen with thumbs up signs?

Imagine Harris or Biden standing in that photo the way Trump did. We wouldn't hear the end of it until 2030.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

Ah, sorry. I thought you were quoting with approval.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this consider 'whataboutism'?

Why did she invite someone who called her son a loser to his grave site?

Why is she happy that the man she invited, considers her son a sucker and a loser. And he thinks more of his toupee than he does of her son? If it was raining that day, he would have canceled on her like he did at the cemetery of the D-Day solders who also gave their lives in service to our nation. He also considers those who survived to be better than her son because he died and they didn't.

I have no idea how people support him when he plainly disrespects them and their families.

My father and brother were career military and they knew (as did my mother and children) that fighting in a war zone, they could be killed. It's an all volunteer army now and these soldiers all know the danger involved in fighting in a war zone and all their families know this.

No $hit they know. Your answer has nothing to do with PP’s comment. My family knew too. Are you so obtuse you don’t understand that it’s still inappropriate for a commander in chief to insult them? WTH kind of logic is that? Shame on you for supporting someone who hates your family.

It’s because people like them hate others. There is no other reason anyone could support Trump. He hates and they hate, so they overlook that he has no respect for them at all and in fact, looks down on them for serving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

And I bet most of us wouldn't have pressed charges. That juice isn't worth the squeeze. We've seen that the law doesn't apply to Trump so all it would have resulted in is the wrath of Trump/MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

Ah, sorry. I thought you were quoting with approval.

No problem. It happens. MAGA has no purpose except to threaten people who dare to speak out about that scum or simply do their job with dignity and integrity, like Rusty or Ruby and her daughter or judges who aren’t Leonard Leo’s corrupt puppets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

And I bet most of us wouldn't have pressed charges. That juice isn't worth the squeeze. We've seen that the law doesn't apply to Trump so all it would have resulted in is the wrath of Trump/MAGA.

Which is a shame because that just emboldens him further. He thinks he is immune to any law, any regulation, any rule. Even the rules of decency.

[Anonymous]

Trump showing up is worst vs Westboro Baptist church having shown up. What a divider and con man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Trumpers need to stop arguing this, accept it and move on. It was a clear violation.

https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Portals/0/ANC-media-policy.pdf

(8) Filming or photographing will not be permitted if it conveys the impression that
cemetery officials or any visitor or family member is endorsing any product, service or
organization. Additionally, ANC will not authorize any filming for partisan, political or
fundraising purposes, in accordance with the Hatch Act, 32 CFR 553, and AR 360-1.

It was partisan and political and I'm sure Trump was hoping to raise funds off of it as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If the staffer didn’t lie, then she has nothing to worry about"

Agreed -Rusty Bowers

Wow. You are implying that all the times MAGA has harassed election poll workers and judges and others, often with death threats or with bodily harm, it was for good reason because you accuse them of lying.

Despicable. One might even say deplorable.

I think you missed my point. I was mocking the person who claimed the one who was assaulted had nothing to worry about if they’re telling the truth, which is a lie. MAGA will attack you, regardless.

And I bet most of us wouldn't have pressed charges. That juice isn't worth the squeeze. We've seen that the law doesn't apply to Trump so all it would have resulted in is the wrath of Trump/MAGA.

Which is a shame because that just emboldens him further. He thinks he is immune to any law, any regulation, any rule. Even the rules of decency.

His MAGA courts can't help him outrun Father Time.