SWS has jumped the shark

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Is there somewhere we can find out about what happened at this meeting officially? I live in the neighborhood and haven't heard anything about it. Is the deal that it's going to be an overflow shelter only but then that stops all programming for the fall/winter in case the space needs to be used? Or just that programming will be cancelled while in use?

Also why is the playground shutting down? That's not only an important resource for SWS (they'll just have no playground at all? Will they be allowed out on the filed at least or are they... walking to Stanton Park? I can't even think of a close green space not attached to a different school), it's basically the only local playground open afterschool and is used by tons of kids. Also does this mean the DPR afterschool Sherwood hosted isn't happening? That's a resource for many lower income families that go to schools on the Hill with $$ aftercare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

[Anonymous]

Important to remember that weird people on this site sometimes make things up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don't know how else to tell you this. You fundamentally misunderstand the word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Important to remember that weird people on this site sometimes make things up.

It is important to remember that ignorant people who don’t like to hear facts contrary to what they would like to believe enjoy calling people names instead of informing themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

Please call Charles Allen’s office and tell them this. He told the people on the community meeting we were bad people if we objected to this.

Furthermore, Charles Allen did not have a plan to address anything. Not the lack of programming, not the PROJECTED TWO MONTH CLOSURE of the Sherwood rec park (yes I heard him later say should only be two weeks- except the city is closing it for 2 months), not anything.

No plan at all. No plan at the ready. And while my kids are too old for SWD, if I was an SWS parent I would be livid at his no response. As a nearby parent of older kids who would love to play basketball or have gymnastics like other gym a (not do it yourself pickleball) I am livid at Allen’s incompetence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

Please call Charles Allen’s office and tell them this. He told the people on the community meeting we were bad people if we objected to this.

Furthermore, Charles Allen did not have a plan to address anything. Not the lack of programming, not the PROJECTED TWO MONTH CLOSURE of the Sherwood rec park (yes I heard him later say should only be two weeks- except the city is closing it for 2 months), not anything.

No plan at all. No plan at the ready. And while my kids are too old for SWD, if I was an SWS parent I would be livid at his no response. As a nearby parent of older kids who would love to play basketball or have gymnastics like other gym a (not do it yourself pickleball) I am livid at Allen’s incompetence.

The playground will be closed for 1-2 weeks, but DGS put in a two month window for the potential timing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

This makes me sad. Someone died a few blocks from our house from hypothermia a few winters ago. I wish we had better solutions that took care of people with mental illnesses and substance abuse problems, that didn't compromise the ability of the community to also have resources like programming and rec sports availability.

We have some much empty office space in the city right now. Why aren't we using it to help people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

This makes me sad. Someone died a few blocks from our house from hypothermia a few winters ago. I wish we had better solutions that took care of people with mental illnesses and substance abuse problems, that didn't compromise the ability of the community to also have resources like programming and rec sports availability.

We have some much empty office space in the city right now. Why aren't we using it to help people?

See, above. People like you are all about "helping" as long as it isn't in your neighborhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also SWS is in Ward 6 repped by Charles Allen who is all about making big performative statements about racism while not pushing real change to benefit DC.

By the way, I was at a community meeting with Charles Allen where they discussed turning Sherwood Rec into a homeless shelter. When people said they were opposed to having a shelter so near a school, he tried to shame everyone for being opposed to this (as if Sherwood was the only option and it was okay to remove a community asset).

So there you go- you elect performative clowns who want to appear as anti racist as possible but make no real positive community change, and you end up with homeless shelters next to elementary schools.

You seem not to know what "performative" means. You accuse him of being performative regarding racism and then take issue with him trying to convert Sherwood to a shelter. Performative would be giving lip service to the need for shelters and supports and then refusing to allow them in his Ward (hello W3). That's not what happened here. What happened here is he advocated for a scarce resource to be allocated to one marginalized group over and above another, both of which serve equity and racism goals.

What's funny is I categorically object to converting Sherwood to a shelter. I want it to remain what it is and I don't want the shelter next to a school. Heck, I don't want it in my neighborhood either, but I'm not a bleeding heart. I think he's wrong. I've told his staff this. But the example you cite above is NOT performative.

No, it absolutely is performative. There was no need to sacrifice the rec center for this stunt. There are other places and hotels to house the drug addicts on H street. And while Allen gets the bragging rights for being a savior, it is his constituents who must suffer the loss of a valuable community resource, not him.

I don’t think there is a proposal to turn Sherwood into a homeless shelter. AFAIK it has been operating for years as an overflow hyperthermia shelter for women as needed during the winter.

People at the meeting objected to turning Sherwood into a temporary shelter not because (as Allen alleged) we are bad people but because there is almost no programming at all at Sherwood as it is a temporary shelter.

Shutting down the playground for the fall that serves SWS is another heartbreak. So we are losing rec center programming and a playground, both valuable resources for the community.

Allen’s plan is to write letters but otherwise do nothing. He needs to go. Pathetic.

Why is the playground being shut down?

https://capitolhillcorner.org/2023/07/26/mpd-expects-closure-in-july-3-murder-of-afghan-lyft-driver-on-11th-street-ne/

"Dysfunction at Sherwood Recreation Center. CM Charles Allen responded to a question about lack of programming and maintenance at Sherwood Recreation Center. He expressed frustration with the Department of Parks and Recreation saying the lack of programming a huge problem. He cited his success in getting funding last winter to get the playground resurfaced and worked to get a contract out but DGS “is so far behind” that they delayed the project until this fall which is prime time for the playground. He said that we’re not seeing DGS and DPR invest in Sherwood the way they need to and noted that Sherwood is one of a handful of DPR facilities used as hypothermia shelters and that has a significant impact on the community.
Commissioner Roberta Shapiro added her own frustration at trying to determine accountability for the lack of programming and maintenance at the facility citing a meeting with DPR staff last Friday. She said she found herself in a Catch 22 bureaucratic situation with nobody accountable. Programming is do it yourself with nothing for seniors and no arts programs and two hours for small children. ANC6A wrote a letter to DPR in June, received no response, followed up two weeks ago, and as far as she knew, received no response to that. Regarding the hypothermia shelter, she said when you ask how they are allocated and for a list of shelters, DPR says it comes from the Department of Human Services, and they both say the Mayor makes the final decision."

So sounds like it will be temporarily closed for resurfacing.

That's crazy. The surface is not so bad in the playground that kids can't use it... They should at least wait for winter & try to get it done in December/Jan/Feb when there's less use. Also, how long could resurfacing the playground possibly take? The whole playground surface was put in in the not-so-new anymore Miner playground in 1-2 weeks? If that's all they mean, this is a much less big deal (although I still wouldn't time it with the beginning of school, because that sucks for the SWS kids).

Would it surprise you to know that people at an ANC meeting are exaggerating? Both the length of the playground closure and the impact of the hypothermia women’s shelter (which has been operating as such at Sherwood for several years.) The only actual problem here seems to be lack of programs at Sherwood.

The shelter operates only at night during cold emergencies and likely under capacity. That should not impact programming extensively.

Last winter the women's hypothermia shelter limited the availability of the basketball court in the evenings. (If you have a kid who plays basketball you know court time is hard to get!) It also encouraged the women who use the shelter to hang out outside Sherwood in unsafe manners throughout the evening. There is no real security and many of these women have significant mental illnesses. My family witnessed women urinating in the landscaping, women passing out in the doorway, and women ranting and screaming at no one. It did not feel safe. We used to let our kids walk into the rec center alone but when the shelter is operating we feel we need to escort them.

This makes me sad. Someone died a few blocks from our house from hypothermia a few winters ago. I wish we had better solutions that took care of people with mental illnesses and substance abuse problems, that didn't compromise the ability of the community to also have resources like programming and rec sports availability.

We have some much empty office space in the city right now. Why aren't we using it to help people?

See, above. People like you are all about "helping" as long as it isn't in your neighborhood.

You’re not talking to me, but I will happily respond. There is no reason to use Sherwood. Most community rec centers are not used for this purpose. Instead of pushing to keep the community rec center for Capitol Hill open for the community, Charles Allen would rather shame the people who elected him to the Dc council instead of finding solutions for the whole community.

He is a total disgrace.