I still don't understand how all of this is coming out now but not during the election. Why did people start doing research after he was elected and not before? |
Read the thread. The “liberal New York Times” wanted to run of feature on the “dynamic new congressman” from Long Island. They had no interest before the election. A tiny local North Shore paper had some of it, but no one noticed or paid attention. |
I think people got wowed by someone who fits the "diversity and inclusion" but still conservative persona. The guy is gay. He claimed to be Jew-ish. His family is from S. America. It's like a Rs wet dream of diversity rolled into one. Trans would be too far for the right. IMO, NYT wanted to showcase him as this new shiny toy. Shoddy work. I expect this from Fox News, but not NYT. |
Yes people paid attention but not enough. Watching that crook stand and take that speaker vote is so frustrating and depressing. |
Also notable that the New York Post also completely missed it. |
He seems lonely and sad
|
He should resign. He should feel better if he does that. |
Let it go. Let him serve his constituents and see how he does. This country was built and run by men with worse stories. |
Like who? |
The Japanese have a saying: a man is whatever room he is in. George Santos is now in Congress. |
Newsday is the local paper for Long Island. |
Yes, it’s been well documented here that they also missed it. |
He played his constituents. They are done with him. |
He showed up sporting a Cartier Santos wristwatch but without a wedding ring and no husband anywhere to be found. Indeed the press has yet to locate evidence of a legal marriage. No wedding announcement. No marriage license. No photos or press coverage. Curious to learn if his purported husband/fiancé/partner has a green card or citizenship, or has hightailed it to Brazil. |
The PAC has apparently “repaid” the loan. |