Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone in this thread going to defend Roe on Constitutional grounds... a legal defense of the original decision? Or is this just performative? The solution is in the legislatures and through more sound cases. Forget Roe.

With the GOP changing votes in secret and openly attacking democracy - what did Abbott say? Texas is only being kept red by their cheating? - what recourse does the majority actually have when the GOP has rigged so much?

[Anonymous]

Looking forward to all of the people who spent the last two years screaming about HIPAA excusing the massive surveillance regime that will be set up to monitor pregnant women and make sure they don't get an abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm perfectly willing to return the favor if you want to play this way.

Oh wow another Republican who doesn’t like consequences. I’m caaaaaaaaanceling the lying religious extremists, waaaaaaaaaaah. A “duck your feelings” Republican is having a sad and needs to “return the favor.”

You belong to a minority religious extremist party. I cannot begin to describe to you how little most people think of hypocrites like you guys.

Actually, I support abortion legality in many cases, but people like you certainly make me question that support, and whether I should act on it in any way. Unfortunately left-wing extremists like yourself make reasonable compromise impossible. How about reading your screed and thinking a bit.

Oh, please. No one buys your "actually, I support abortion legality in many case" BS. This is your weak attemp to manipulate people who make you feel uncomfortable.

Whatever, believe what you want. There are cases where abortion must be legal for certain reasons. That's a majority opinion.

Yes, but because some anonymous random person calls you a hypocrite, you no longer believe in that majority opinione. It sounds ridiculous, but that is not what I believe, that is what you wrote.

Of course not. The extremism expressed by the pro abortion constituency definitely influences how much weight I give the issue from a voting perspective. There are hundreds of issues. This isn't about some anon internet poster. It's about the behavior of that group in general displayed year after year after year.

So, someone calling you a hypocrite is "extremism", and causes you to vote in favor of denying life-saving abortions. Got it.

Talk about snowflake behavior.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

If moderate and right-leaning women who are pro-choice simply went on a national sex strike, this could be resolved in a few weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to all of the people who spent the last two years screaming about HIPAA excusing the massive surveillance regime that will be set up to monitor pregnant women and make sure they don't get an abortion.

Or not being able to get a D&C at 8 weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have prayed for this day for decades. Praise God!

You prayed for the demise of America?! Aren’t you a sweet little patriot! I pray that you end up with an unwanted pregnancy!

[Anonymous]

Agency over your body is the most fundamental of freedoms. The United States is no longer a free country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just find the reasoning "not rooted in history" to be so asinine. It's basically make america great again.

It is no different than saying it's rooted in Sharia Law or Rabbinic Law. The premise is: the world and civilizations do not change for hundreds or thousands of years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yay! Now time for congress to listen to the American people and write some laws...

Which people do you think Congress listens to? The majority who support Roe? Or the republicans who represent the minority of Americans?

They should listen to the majority who support Roe because a great many are suburban, college educated Republican women who vote and can, and will, vote Democrat in Nov.

I hope Planned Parenthood or something like PP will start a fund to help women with funds to get to another state that allows abortions. This is a gift to the Dems for this year's campaign and do for a moment think people don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If moderate and right-leaning women who are pro-choice simply went on a national sex strike, this could be resolved in a few weeks.

Isn’t that the truth. But instead they’ll twist themselves into pretzels about how this won’t affect them and they’ll still have access and it’s not all bad because it will keep the royal Them from getting reckless abortions, and they’ll continue to debase themselves for the trash they married.

Self hate runs deep.

[Anonymous]

The Texas AG who is under 8 different felony indictments just declared today an agency holiday from here on out and let the staff go early in celebration of the sanctity of life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder that the mindset of far right Catholic Taliban institution Georgetown Prep as seen in Kavanaugh and Gorsuch is pervasive across the current student body and teaching staff today. Just a vile institution filled with primarily the silver spooned sons of greedy white supremacists. Same goes with Amy Coney Barrett's Notre Dame.

Wow. Can you be any more hyperbolic?

You have such disdain for people who believe that babies should have a chance at life.

Oh, do tell about your support for assistance to women and families after they have those babies. Or how you support reasonable gun restrictions, so that those babies aren't innocently killed while in school? No? Oh, right, you only care about "babies" when they are in the womb or just at the point of crowning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas' opinion is really concerning.

SO CONCERNING!!!!

Anita hill knew.

Clearly! Sexual deviants hold the highest court in the country. Dig out the skeletons in SCJ closets, again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for nothing, RBG.

IT WAS 6-3 it would've of make a difference

IF she had retired, it would've been a clear cut 5-4. Roberts alluded to wanting something less than a total ban.
This is part of her legacy.