The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please let’s not discuss the children at all, even when they are on parade. We don’t have to. So let’s not.

Agreed, I report any discussion of their outfits that gets specific other than “looks cute.” People are already talking about Ivanka’s daughter like she’s an adult and she is only 13. None of these kids asked to be part of this circus.

That’s discussing the children. Why don’t you report that? Even saying they’re cute might invite further discussion of them.

Because calling them cute isn’t remarking on their bodies or their choices, we’re not banned from calling little kids cute.

Calling them cute (I assume because of their looks) isn’t remarking on their bodies or choices (like what they’re wearing)? Either the kids’ clothing is fair game on a fashion thread or the kids shouldn’t be discussed at all — even if the comments are complimentary.

Um no calling a child cute is not “remarking on their bodies” you total weirdo- if you can’t figure out the difference then you absolutely should refrain from mentioning the kids.

Does “looks cute” refer to the actual children themselves or their outfits? What’s cute? Their smiles? Their hair? Their diminutive statue?

Talk about them or don’t, but if it’s okay for one poster to say they look cute, that opens the door for another poster to disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please let’s not discuss the children at all, even when they are on parade. We don’t have to. So let’s not.

Agreed, I report any discussion of their outfits that gets specific other than “looks cute.” People are already talking about Ivanka’s daughter like she’s an adult and she is only 13. None of these kids asked to be part of this circus.

That’s discussing the children. Why don’t you report that? Even saying they’re cute might invite further discussion of them.

Because calling them cute isn’t remarking on their bodies or their choices, we’re not banned from calling little kids cute.

Calling them cute (I assume because of their looks) isn’t remarking on their bodies or choices (like what they’re wearing)? Either the kids’ clothing is fair game on a fashion thread or the kids shouldn’t be discussed at all — even if the comments are complimentary.

Um no calling a child cute is not “remarking on their bodies” you total weirdo- if you can’t figure out the difference then you absolutely should refrain from mentioning the kids.

Does “looks cute” refer to the actual children themselves or their outfits? What’s cute? Their smiles? Their hair? Their diminutive statue*?

Talk about them or don’t, but if it’s okay for one poster to say they look cute, that opens the door for another poster to disagree.

*Stature

[Anonymous]

And now you idiots have turned this into three pages about the kids. SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please let’s not discuss the children at all, even when they are on parade. We don’t have to. So let’s not.

Agreed, I report any discussion of their outfits that gets specific other than “looks cute.” People are already talking about Ivanka’s daughter like she’s an adult and she is only 13. None of these kids asked to be part of this circus.

That’s discussing the children. Why don’t you report that? Even saying they’re cute might invite further discussion of them.

Because calling them cute isn’t remarking on their bodies or their choices, we’re not banned from calling little kids cute.

Calling them cute (I assume because of their looks) isn’t remarking on their bodies or choices (like what they’re wearing)? Either the kids’ clothing is fair game on a fashion thread or the kids shouldn’t be discussed at all — even if the comments are complimentary.

Um no calling a child cute is not “remarking on their bodies” you total weirdo- if you can’t figure out the difference then you absolutely should refrain from mentioning the kids.

Does “looks cute” refer to the actual children themselves or their outfits? What’s cute? Their smiles? Their hair? Their diminutive statue?

Talk about them or don’t, but if it’s okay for one poster to say they look cute, that opens the door for another poster to disagree.

This seems incredibly complicated for you. I agree that you shouldn’t mention any kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

It’s definitely too short and looked ridiculous on Ivanka and we definitely commented on it at the time.

But it’s a cute dress on a kid, and cute that they matched, and cute that they reused the dress. Makes them seem more human unlike the current “special” employees running around the White House.

Although Ivanka is definitely a grifter like the rest of them, she seems like a less malevolent grifter and doesn’t appear to have any designs on destroying the American way of life. I also miss her bizarro outfits. She seems to dress better now which I think reflects a lifestyle that fits her better- relaxing in Florida off the ill gotten gains of the first Trump administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

It’s definitely too short and looked ridiculous on Ivanka and we definitely commented on it at the time.

But it’s a cute dress on a kid, and cute that they matched, and cute that they reused the dress. Makes them seem more human unlike the current “special” employees running around the White House.

Although Ivanka is definitely a grifter like the rest of them, she seems like a less malevolent grifter and doesn’t appear to have any designs on destroying the American way of life. I also miss her bizarro outfits. She seems to dress better now which I think reflects a lifestyle that fits her better- relaxing in Florida off the ill gotten gains of the first Trump administration.

She is absolutely malevolent but your comment is getting deleted anyway because you mention the kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now you idiots have turned this into three pages about the kids. SMH.

It’s one poster who is grumpy that her posts were reported and deleted and others were not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

It’s definitely too short and looked ridiculous on Ivanka and we definitely commented on it at the time.

But it’s a cute dress on a kid, and cute that they matched, and cute that they reused the dress. Makes them seem more human unlike the current “special” employees running around the White House.

Although Ivanka is definitely a grifter like the rest of them, she seems like a less malevolent grifter and doesn’t appear to have any designs on destroying the American way of life. I also miss her bizarro outfits. She seems to dress better now which I think reflects a lifestyle that fits her better- relaxing in Florida off the ill gotten gains of the first Trump administration.

She is absolutely malevolent but your comment is getting deleted anyway because you mention the kid.

I don’t consider Ivanka malevolent- entitled, yes, grifting, yes, a liar, yes…

Then again maybe you are right! 😂🤣😂

At least her kooky wardrobe was more interesting than Elon and Stephen Miller!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

It’s definitely too short and looked ridiculous on Ivanka and we definitely commented on it at the time.

But it’s a cute dress on a kid, and cute that they matched, and cute that they reused the dress. Makes them seem more human unlike the current “special” employees running around the White House.

Although Ivanka is definitely a grifter like the rest of them, she seems like a less malevolent grifter and doesn’t appear to have any designs on destroying the American way of life. I also miss her bizarro outfits. She seems to dress better now which I think reflects a lifestyle that fits her better- relaxing in Florida off the ill gotten gains of the first Trump administration.

She is absolutely malevolent but your comment is getting deleted anyway because you mention the kid.

I don’t consider Ivanka malevolent- entitled, yes, grifting, yes, a liar, yes…

Then again maybe you are right! 😂🤣😂

At least her kooky wardrobe was more interesting than Elon and Stephen Miller!

Raise a glass for her kooky wardrobe - I will agree with you there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone with their resources looks like a darling.

The children bear such a striking resemblance to their parents (pre-cosmetic procedures) that I all I can see is the future of nepobaby grifting that lies ahead.

[Anonymous]

How do we get a “no discussion of children” rule? It seems like avoiding them altogether would be the cleanest option and has virtually no downside. Even if they’re in a published photo, we don’t have to comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will say I like that Arabella is wearing an almost 10 year old hand-me-down from her mom:

I like that she is wearing her mom's dress! Always cool to recycle an item versus buying something new.

That dress was two sizes too small on Ivanka. I guess that was the style at the time.

That is frequently the style for Ivanka.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do we get a “no discussion of children” rule? It seems like avoiding them altogether would be the cleanest option and has virtually no downside. Even if they’re in a published photo, we don’t have to comment.

There is a rule. We were banned from talking about Barron until he turned 18. If you don't like a post, report it rather than complaining to a wall.