
Those aren’t new lawsuits. Lawsuits take a long time both to initiate and to progress and just because you hear new info about a lawsuit doesn’t mean that it’s new litigation. |
Kate is never divorcing. She will allow Will to have a discreet mistress if he wanted. Kate is excellent in her role and knows exactly what to do, and this will actually likely make them a happy and content couple. It's all about the rules and what to do and what not to do within those rules. She's mastered it. Harry and Meghan, on the other hand, are a growing trainwreck, an when it finally does crash it's gonna be spectacular. |
In the meantime, Meghan is listed as a speaker for Girl Up 2020, along with Michelle Obama and other A-listers. I think Hollywood isn't working out so she's re-imagining herself as a global thinker and..."personality", of sorts. Although it's difficult to think of a less useful role model for girls than someone whose every advancement in life came through men. |
Unemployed idle rich nitwits who do literally nothing all day but obsess over their fame and "brand" and how to grift to keep their lifestyle going. It's all so sad and pathetic. |
Agree that Kate would never divorce. I could see William leaving her for a mistress down the line. His dad did the same thing and there were very minimal consequences in the long run. He broke up with her for other girls occasionally when they dated which speaks to his character. |
Camilla was always Charles' great love for better or for worse. Will doesn't have anything like that although I don't rule out the possibility of him meeting a woman down the road that could turn into his great love. But what differed for Charles was that Diana didn't accept it. If she'd accepted it as previous royal wives would have, and that their marriage was in name and made her peace with it, then who knows how differently things could have turned out. Charles and Diana were a disaster for each other. And Charles got away with marrying Camilla because by the time it happened everyone knew the whole story and that they'd been in love for decades, so it smoothed things over. Kate, by contrast, really seems to have modeled herself over the royal wives of old, impeccable, discreet, never complains, and not demanding. And it helps that she and Will clearly have some kind of connection so I daresay it's going to be one of those marriages that if Will strays with a fling here or there, Kate is not going to be too upset and will not cause a fuss. At the same time Will knows, from the example of his parents' marriage, the dangers of divorce and dumping Kate over someone he'd just met. The monarch wouldn't swing that kind of scandal easily. And I don't see Will doing anything that drastic and will go for the discreet mistress route if he elects. If anything, I think Will will grow more and more dependent on Kate as time goes on - he clearly relishes the relative normalcy of Kate's family and their family circle is incredibly tight and loyal and discreet, which must be a rock to him, and Will is someone who is somewhat reluctant about his position as future king, but he knows he can't avoid it, and Kate has all the makings of being the strong woman keeping him on the path he needs to take, and Will knows it and he's bright enough not to endanger it. Anyway, Will will have enough on his hands with the inevitable Suffolk bust up and divorce in due time. Harry will come back to Britain with his tail between his legs and Will and Kate will be there for him. |
This. She is there for being a pseudo Duchess. Not because of any accomplishments, unless you think if landing a trust fund baby from an outdated, colonizer, human rights abuser, racist, pedophilia hiding family is an accomplishment. |
Harry is gone forever. Even if he gets divorced he will never come back because there is nothing for him but to sit around in Will’s shadow. Also if Harry felt that his family is a source of emotional support he would never have left. The moment he had to leave the military the clock started on him leaving. |
I've read the LCC book on Harry and Meghan and her opinion is that no one reasonable could have been a source of emotional support for Harry because his needs in this regard are unreasonable. She paints him as stubborn, spoiled, not too bright, ruled by emotion, and entirely comfortable in the role of a victim wronged by his mother's death who was wronged the world itself. |
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/07/harry-meghan-william-kate-falling-out-finding-freedom A book to “expose” the monarchy. Yes, H and M didn’t write it but of course they had a part in it. The article mentions that they felt overshadowed by W and K and that W and K were given priority over them. Of course they were, you nitwits. W is the heir and his children are next in line. That’s how royalty works. Meghan’s desperate need for attention grows more pathetic by the day. |
+1 |
I wanted to like them but they’ve made it impossible. |
I have a relative like Harry. Irrational, emotionally needy and can’t play any role other than victim so they find offense in everything. You can’t say or do anything without their finding harm. Ex. “Your child is so sweet.” “Of course she’s sweet. Why wouldn’t she be? You think it’s not possible that I would have a sweet child, don’t you?” William and Kate couldn’t have done anything to help him. There is no way to help or support these types. |
Yes, Harry and Megan are those relatives that hijack thanksgiving dinner to tell you they’re dropping out of school to do other things yet have no idea what those things are and how they’re going to support themselves. |
I keep reading that Meghan is an attention-seeker, but she has been completely out of the limelight for months and months. They are living a very private life, it seems. |