To My Fellow Trump Voters: You guys and Gals ROCK!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

DP. If Republicans truly reject Neo-Nazis and the KKK, then they should nullify any votes they receive from anybody in those organizations.

First, how would they know, and second, it's unconstitutional. Should we also nullify the votes of BLM supporters calling to "fry 'em like bacon"? No matter how distasteful these people are, it's free speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

I liked it. To the first PP, I think we're supposed to use a lamb's blood. (Poor thing.) Pass the word!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

+1

Drama student?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

? Didn't I just say there was bipartisan support for Trump to denounce the KKK?

I don't have a strategy for 2018. I'm actually not that into politics, and I'm a former R. I just see how divided this country is and fail to see Trump doing anything to unite it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

Sorry, but when every single article (or 98% of them) twists everything around to show Trump in the worst possible light, then yes, of course it is biased. Would you say that Breitbart, which does the same thing from the opposite side, is unbiased?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

DP. If Republicans truly reject Neo-Nazis and the KKK, then they should nullify any votes they receive from anybody in those organizations.

First, how would they know, and second, it's unconstitutional. Should we also nullify the votes of BLM supporters calling to "fry 'em like bacon"? No matter how distasteful these people are, it's free speech.

Extreme vetting. It's not unconstitutional to protect constitutional rights. BLM's purpose is not to "fry 'em like bacon", although that is a distasteful and misguided thing for someone to say. Can't say the same for the purposes of the neo-Nazis and the KKK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

DP. If Republicans truly reject Neo-Nazis and the KKK, then they should nullify any votes they receive from anybody in those organizations.

Why don't you run that by the ACLU first.

Got it. So Republicans reject the neo-Nazis and KKK on Twitter to look nice, but that's as far as it goes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

OK.. so what are the great outcomes?

NAFTA - Trump's not done anything yet.
TPP - he pulled out of it, and now the farmers, who overwhelmingly are R and voted for him, are really worried
ACA - I don't even need to say anything about this
NK - there was very little chance that Kim would've bombed Guam, and even Putin said that NK would rather have their people eating grass than give up their nukes. China and Russia, NK's closest allies, couldn't even prevent them from getting the nukes.
Illegal Immigrants - what town/city not along the border has seen a dramatic decrease in illegal immigrants? Have you seen them all disappear?
The Wall - so, it turns out that MX won't be paying for it. American taxpayers will. Certainly the illegal immigrants won't be paying for it.

You want to focus on outcomes, but to date, there really is not much you can point to in terms of outcome.

My brain is wired to use critical thinking skills, and to recognize when I'm being bamboozled by a snake oil salesman. And sure, past POTUS have had their personal issues, but I have a line and some standards. Trump goes below them. I'm sorry you have such low standards for your POTUS. Basically, what I hear you saying is "who cares if he shoots someone on 5th ave as long as he does things that I agree with."

And I'm a former R.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

Sorry, but when every single article (or 98% of them) twists everything around to show Trump in the worst possible light, then yes, of course it is biased. Would you say that Breitbart, which does the same thing from the opposite side, is unbiased?

Let me turn that question back to you:

If every newspaper had a story saying that flooding from Hurricane Harvey was "devastating," would you say that is biased or would you say that is merely reporting things as they are?

Drawing this back to your Dear Leader: there is a reason that so many publications report bad things about Trump. It is because we can all see what is before our eyes. These news organizations seem to bend over backwards to find any reason to say something good when he even manages to tie his shoes, or read a speech off a teleprompter. It's just he does so. many. bad. things. all. the. time. It would be impossible for a news outlet not to report on these things, because he is the president and what he does and says has to be reported on.

This reminds me. NPR had Ben Carson on this morning, to talk about what his agency is going to do for those affected by Harvey. The interview started off so pleasant and friendly - but he could not answer the questions he was given in any sensical way. Should the interviewer have cut off the interview rather than let Carson keep talking, making himself sound less and less informed or competent?

[Anonymous]

^ And I didn't call you a single bad name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

Sorry, but when every single article (or 98% of them) twists everything around to show Trump in the worst possible light, then yes, of course it is biased. Would you say that Breitbart, which does the same thing from the opposite side, is unbiased?

Let me turn that question back to you:

If every newspaper had a story saying that flooding from Hurricane Harvey was "devastating," would you say that is biased or would you say that is merely reporting things as they are?

Drawing this back to your Dear Leader: there is a reason that so many publications report bad things about Trump. It is because we can all see what is before our eyes. These news organizations seem to bend over backwards to find any reason to say something good when he even manages to tie his shoes, or read a speech off a teleprompter. It's just he does so. many. bad. things. all. the. time. It would be impossible for a news outlet not to report on these things, because he is the president and what he does and says has to be reported on.

This reminds me. NPR had Ben Carson on this morning, to talk about what his agency is going to do for those affected by Harvey. The interview started off so pleasant and friendly - but he could not answer the questions he was given in any sensical way. Should the interviewer have cut off the interview rather than let Carson keep talking, making himself sound less and less informed or competent?

Thank you kindly from refraining from the name-calling.

As to the other, it's a facf that there is nothing good about Harvey. I would expect all negative articles. But to say that there is nothing good about Trump is NOT a fact, it's an opinion, and choosing to present everything in a negative fashion simply reflects the WaPo's bias. The fact that you can't see this reflects your own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

Sorry, but when every single article (or 98% of them) twists everything around to show Trump in the worst possible light, then yes, of course it is biased. Would you say that Breitbart, which does the same thing from the opposite side, is unbiased?

Let me turn that question back to you:

If every newspaper had a story saying that flooding from Hurricane Harvey was "devastating," would you say that is biased or would you say that is merely reporting things as they are?

Drawing this back to your Dear Leader: there is a reason that so many publications report bad things about Trump. It is because we can all see what is before our eyes. These news organizations seem to bend over backwards to find any reason to say something good when he even manages to tie his shoes, or read a speech off a teleprompter. It's just he does so. many. bad. things. all. the. time. It would be impossible for a news outlet not to report on these things, because he is the president and what he does and says has to be reported on.

This reminds me. NPR had Ben Carson on this morning, to talk about what his agency is going to do for those affected by Harvey. The interview started off so pleasant and friendly - but he could not answer the questions he was given in any sensical way. Should the interviewer have cut off the interview rather than let Carson keep talking, making himself sound less and less informed or competent?

Thank you kindly from refraining from the name-calling.

As to the other, it's a facf that there is nothing good about Harvey. I would expect all negative articles. But to say that there is nothing good about Trump is NOT a fact, it's an opinion, and choosing to present everything in a negative fashion simply reflects the WaPo's bias. The fact that you can't see this reflects your own.

DP.. WSJ is a well respected news source. Why do you suppose they have so many negative articles about Trump?

[Anonymous]

^ In fact what I said is that every news outlet goes out of their way to find anything good they can say about him. How many "this is the day he became president" stories have you seen now - fifty, a thousand?

I can see my own bias. I fucking hate this guy. I really hate him. I hate who is he, what he says, what he represents, what he brings out in other people. I hate that we have to follow every dumb thought that comes into his head and flies through his fingers. I did not watch the Apprentice; I have never found him entertaining. I do not find him entertaining or even baseline competent now.

I also work in journalism - not politics, don't worry - and I know how this stuff gets reported. You are naive as hell if you think that the reason there are a lot of bad stories about Trump is because of bias. There are only so many ways you can report on a shit sandwich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

I liked it. To the first PP, I think we're supposed to use a lamb's blood. (Poor thing.) Pass the word!

Thanks. Okay.