They aren't too happy with the English instruction at YY though. |
Yeah but the person who does all the hiring speaks fluent Mandarin, the director. The principal was either the principal or vice-principal of a fairfax county school prior to YY. She was instrumental in establishing that school's IB program. FWIW, there are a couple of mandarin administrators on board. They are white or bi-racial (black/Chinese). I understand from this thread that the ethnically Chinese administrator is somehow tainted by the AA blood running through her veins, therefore not good enough for you racist. |
Apparently some Chinese people count more as "Chinese" than others; like how the adopted Chinese kids should not be considered as Chinese b/c they were adopted by non-Chinese. All the YY threads have been really ugly and racist. |
| and assimilated Chinese are not as "Chinese" as Cantonese speaking immigrants... |
Ten years ago, the Dept. of Ed commissioned a comprehensive study of dual immersion language program outputs in public schools nation-wide, done by the Center for Applied Linguistics. The researchers concluded that 50/50 dual immersion outputs are superior to one-way immersion, at least when ES students arrive with a firm grounding in English. The study report talks about how peer-provided cultural inputs are as important as language inputs in motivating children to continue with language study later. http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report63.pdf If what you say is true, PP, if the aim of language immersion is simply to catch DC's growing ranks of middle-class parents, with target languages used being irrelevant, why would DC staunchly reject educational best practices in pursuit of this goal? Why would the District ignore the research when setting admissions policies for most of its immersion schools? It's one thing to strive to create dual immersion programs and fail, perhaps because there aren't enough speakers of a target language with young children in a school district, another to set out to do what research has shown doesn't work very well. If LAMB burns for its lottery law-breaking, maybe its school community members should go down brandishing the report at the Dept. of Ed. |
What a strange perspective. By your logic, since I'm not serious about football, I should spend a year studying football.
No, it is not a great choice if you are not serious about Mandarin. If that's the case, you'd be better off in a different school, where you can focus on things you are serious about. Since we are serious about Mandarin, it is perfect for us.
|
This is probably true. YY is not interested in dialect speakers. They are a Mandarin immersion school so unless the admin is proficient in Mandarin, they won't be interested. Unlike the W. Coast school probably, YY has no Cantonese population to speak of (or if they do, they all speak English) so a Cantonese speaker would not be hired unless they also spoke Mandarin. College friend has blue chip MA in East Asian studies. Perfect Mandarin, learned from a young age and years of experience in China. Also speaks a dialect and has lovely personality, could do outreach locally. No chance of being hired at in-bred YY. Why won't YY parents admit that you don't want dialect speaking little kids who can pick up Mandarin much faster than yours, and model the culture for the others? Why continue to claim this when it's clear that hardly anybody wants more bilingual families involved? Ech, I quit. Amen for MV (and I speak both Spanish and Mandarin). Perhaps because we have no issue whatsoever with dialect-speaking little kids, that's why.
You're going to find this hard to believe, seeing as how you seem to expect the world to do everything exactly the way you want it, but YY parents have no control over school policy. And YY administrators have no control over charter law. Since you're so accomplished, perhaps you can get right on that, and have the law changed? Thanks, love. |
Speak for yourself, outsider. My family is interested in Mandarin. Not Portuguese, Mandarin. |
Yes, it's remarkable what you can take credit for when you don't have to stand behind your words or prove your allegations. |
That hasn't been our experience at all. We've been genuinely impressed with the teachers we've had. The leading edge class has always been something of an odd duck though, and much more different from and difficult than the others - behaviorally and academically. |
She's only the daughter of a US Ambassador to the U.N. and a Chinese mother. Her pedigree isn't pure enough to satisfy the racists. |
Even if it's true, the rest of the world learns English through one-way immersion. One of my best friends in college was from Shanghai and spoke perfect, flawless English - better than mine and I was raised here. Well enough to attend an Ivy League college as an undergrad and she had never been outside China until then. If my kid at YY, learns Mandarin half as well, I'll be happy. |
| Biracials of AA origin are always stuck with this problem. Chinese and black = black. White and black = black. Hispanic and black = black. What's so potent about black for this to exist. I feel we're all equal, so why is this reverse racism tolerated. Is black better or is it so repulsive that any amount negates any other ethnicity. Also, black people (aka self haters) tend to be the ones promoting this hatred, but are other groups doing this too? Is the Chinese/black admin. discounted as Chinese by Chinese people too. What's their malfunction? Sorry to steer to a somewhat off topic arena, but had to. Seems like the community everyone wants to be catered to (ie. the ethnically Chinese) are racist and should be catered too or are too good to be catered to. They cannot be compared to outreach to Latinos and native Spanish speakers in this regard. Latinos in the area are welcoming and "easy" to engage. Chinese are not. True? |
| WTF is the big deal with catering to native speakers of the target language? Why can't charters be amended to allow for preference of native speakers? Other than kids who can't get in due to the preference would be up in arms and kids already in would be happy as kids in slop. What's the big deal? Any plans for any of these charters being sneaky to go legit? |
I have no idea how you could think anything I wrote is racist. I was just stating information about how well the head of school spoke Chinese. I couldn't care less about her race as long as she does a good job. That is my primary concern. Furthermore, there are 3 administrators at YY, none of whom are "mandarin" as you suggest: one AA head of school, one white COO and one white assistant principal. The former COO (different title then) is white and speaks Chinese. She is now working on the DCI and has no hand in the daily operations of YY. The bi-racial AA/Chinese person you speak of is a grant writer and is part of the development department. There is a Chinese program coordinator who appears to also be kindergarten classroom teacher at this time (according the the school's private portal). Interestingly, she is from Guangzhou. The person who screens all the applicants lives in another state, but she is a Taiwan native. |