Ruling on MCPS LGBT curriculum case coming this morning

[Anonymous]

They spend a lot of time teaching it and it is a bit too much. Parents should have the choice. There is a difference with a few sessions vs everything is focused around it. Most kids don’t care. We had a teacher get upset as child did not want to change their name which has a special meaning to them and go by an alternate pronoun. If your kids want to, great, but at some point MCPS has gotten over the top and kids are uncomfortable with it. It has nothing to do with hate but some kids get uncomfortable talking about it as they don’t feel they can be open and honest and some teachers will not be kind if they don’t conform.

[Anonymous]

You keep calling kids bigots but you fail to understand that just because someone does not agree with you doesn’t mean they don’t like you. I don’t agree with kids choosing their sex.
To me that is a sign of mental health issues. But I would never be mean to anyone who is trans and if we click, we could be friends. That is called being open minded and clearly you aren’t if you can’t be respectful of other people’s choices.

[Anonymous]

There are 2 genders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

In what world do you think you can just “make” children stay home? That’s not the way it works sweetheart. You now have to find something else for the 5 year olds to do instead. Otherwise you’re discriminating based on religion, which is not legal.

I’m not “making kids stay home” SCOTUS is saying you can have an excused absence if you don’t want your kids in a lesson that is being taught that day.

I’m here for it. Teachers get to continue teaching. Administrators don’t have to deal with your child. You get to opt out, which is what the lawsuit was all about.

It’s not discrimination because it’s your choice.

You got your way, but you’re still complaining.

DP. That’s not AT ALL what was said, did you even read it?

Yes, I did and I also read the descent,. The descent is actually on your side. They said it would be too much time away from education to get excused absences. Every time they read a book that shows a boy and a boy can marry each other.

Just how much LGBTQIA education is going on that kids will miss “too much time”?

Clearly it’s more than MCPS would like to admit!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 genders.

And all those troublesome intersex people, but why let biological reality get in the way of a dumb slogan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 genders.

And all those troublesome intersex people, but why let biological reality get in the way of a dumb slogan?

There are so many realities in the world. We don’t need to teach them elementary school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 genders.

And all those troublesome intersex people, but why let biological reality get in the way of a dumb slogan?

That’s high school level biology/genetics curriculum, not kindergarten.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

In what world do you think you can just “make” children stay home? That’s not the way it works sweetheart. You now have to find something else for the 5 year olds to do instead. Otherwise you’re discriminating based on religion, which is not legal.

I’m not “making kids stay home” SCOTUS is saying you can have an excused absence if you don’t want your kids in a lesson that is being taught that day.

I’m here for it. Teachers get to continue teaching. Administrators don’t have to deal with your child. You get to opt out, which is what the lawsuit was all about.

It’s not discrimination because it’s your choice.

You got your way, but you’re still complaining.

Except opting out does NOT equal staying home. It means you do something else, that’s the job of the school, to educate. Sans 🏳️‍🌈 agenda.

For younger kids, there’s no other place to put them so they have to stay home. Older kids can go to the cafeteria.

It was actually the three descendants that pointed out that it wasn’t good for these kids to be staying home so much and missing education but the conservatives they were on your side and they said nope it’s OK. You get to stay home. It’s an excused absence.

Congratulations the conservatives are on your side. Keeping you at home making you miss work.

No they don’t just stay home. My child is going to school every single day, and my child is NOT being indoctrinated by your lesbian nonsense. Both can be true, if you try this nonsense on our children it will be another lawsuit!

Enjoy your multiple days off look at it as an opportunity to hit up a service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 genders.

And all those troublesome intersex people, but why let biological reality get in the way of a dumb slogan?

There are so many realities in the world. We don’t need to teach them elementary school.

Yes we do and you can enjoy a day of prayer with your child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

In what world do you think you can just “make” children stay home? That’s not the way it works sweetheart. You now have to find something else for the 5 year olds to do instead. Otherwise you’re discriminating based on religion, which is not legal.

I’m not “making kids stay home” SCOTUS is saying you can have an excused absence if you don’t want your kids in a lesson that is being taught that day.

I’m here for it. Teachers get to continue teaching. Administrators don’t have to deal with your child. You get to opt out, which is what the lawsuit was all about.

It’s not discrimination because it’s your choice.

You got your way, but you’re still complaining.

DP. That’s not AT ALL what was said, did you even read it?

Yes, I did and I also read the descent,. The descent is actually on your side. They said it would be too much time away from education to get excused absences. Every time they read a book that shows a boy and a boy can marry each other.

Just how much LGBTQIA education is going on that kids will miss “too much time”?

None but to religious zealot bigots saying Johnnie has 2 dads is LGBT education.

Reading a book with 2 moms is lgbt education to ignoramuses.

[Anonymous]

Wow! I can’t believe any school system would be so bold to challenge parental rights like this. It’s disgusting behavior and says much about the people you entrust with your children! Very disturbing. Glad you won!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

In what world do you think you can just “make” children stay home? That’s not the way it works sweetheart. You now have to find something else for the 5 year olds to do instead. Otherwise you’re discriminating based on religion, which is not legal.

I’m not “making kids stay home” SCOTUS is saying you can have an excused absence if you don’t want your kids in a lesson that is being taught that day.

I’m here for it. Teachers get to continue teaching. Administrators don’t have to deal with your child. You get to opt out, which is what the lawsuit was all about.

It’s not discrimination because it’s your choice.

You got your way, but you’re still complaining.

DP. That’s not AT ALL what was said, did you even read it?

Yes, I did and I also read the descent,. The descent is actually on your side. They said it would be too much time away from education to get excused absences. Every time they read a book that shows a boy and a boy can marry each other.

Just how much LGBTQIA education is going on that kids will miss “too much time”?

None but to religious zealot bigots saying Johnnie has 2 dads is LGBT education.

Reading a book with 2 moms is lgbt education to ignoramuses.

L is for lesbian. You created this nonsense, now you claim it’s ignoramus? Glad you’re coming to your senses!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are 2 genders.

And all those troublesome intersex people, but why let biological reality get in the way of a dumb slogan?

That’s high school level biology/genetics curriculum, not kindergarten.

This, young kids don’t need to be exposed except to say families and people are different in many ways and it’s all good, just different. There are true intersex people but that goes to biology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I can’t believe any school system would be so bold to challenge parental rights like this. It’s disgusting behavior and says much about the people you entrust with your children! Very disturbing. Glad you won!

All you won was days off of school.

[Anonymous]

Just put the opt out kids in a separate class so that they can pray r whatever on the days with material they find objectionable. They are in school but not creating havoc on the rest of education.