Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The vulgar and graphic way the prosecution tried this case probably contributed to the acquittal. I think the jury saw it for what it was, an attempt to embarrass diddy. Also, they basically outed him as bisexual, which may have offended some jurors. This trial came across to many as a witch hunt and prosecution through PR. Even using DV allegations to deny diddy’s bail is a reach. If I were diddy, I’d sue when this was all said and done.
Everyone in hip hop has known he’s been gay for 30 years. Why do you think 50 Cent has been calling him gay for 20 years? 50 Cent just called him the gay John Gotti. lol
So what if Diddy is bisexual. It’s 2025, not 1995. Fifty is just upset because bisexual Diddy took his girl. Jane is 50-Cent’s ex-girlfriend and baby momma.
He would never admit to being bisexual. That's the offensive part. He struts around with his beautiful women and would not want the public to know about his real habits. He's a liar and gets off on sexual sadism with either sex.
I think he is an abuser because he was abused but will never admit it. Two priests accused of sexual abuse worked at The Bronx all boys Catholic school where Diddy was an altar boy.
Maybe. That is possible. I also think that some people, when they make a lot of money and obtain power, see and take an opportunity to indulge in their fantasies. He was a voyeur to scenarios he created. They pay for everything including participants (women who wamt careers) and the wreckage. It's just pure self-indulgence because he can. Other men without the means would not be able to, would suppress the desire, or use porn. He is an example of bad behavior enabled by money and celebrity, IMO. I think he's just a bad person.