Jon Cryer's Wife is a Gold Digger

[Anonymous]

Jon Cryer's ex wife Sarah Trigger is just another one of those gold diggers who see successful men as their meal ticket just because they happened to birth a baby! Sorry, Ms. Trigger, but it takes more to make a mother than simply popping a puppy out of your loins! You cannot support your son on $8,000 per month in child support payments, and demand a ten-fold increase? Surely, you are quite insane and I hope any judge sees you for the gold digger that you are!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2476323/Jon-Cryers-ex-wife-claims-son-ridiculed-private-schoolmates-deprived-upbringing.html

[Anonymous]

It sounds like she is a raging borderline personality.

[Anonymous]

Be careful about casting negative aspersionis on BPD people here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Be careful about casting negative aspersionis on BPD people here.

Why's that?

[Anonymous]

You'll be told it's not fair to characterize BPD people as craaaazy!

[Anonymous]

Awww...Ducky's having a rough romantic life.

[Anonymous]

Good lord, what a gold digger. She gets $8K a month - which is almost what I make AT MY JOB - and "can't" support a kid on that? I'm sure that $96K can pay for fancy camps, and I'm sure Jon Cryer would shell out for the bar mitzvah.

She's going to be really sad when 2.5 Men finally ends and he goes back to making $100K a year or less.

[Anonymous]

That's why you should be careful who you procreate with.

[Anonymous]

These men and women who bitch about not being able to support their kids on CS payments that are much greater than the national average income disgust me.

[Anonymous]

Just read article and do have to say...he makes 2mil a month and only wants to give his son 8k for support? Yes, that's a lot of dough but I also feel like it's such a low amount when compared to his monthly income. If the kid is going to primarily be with mom, he deserves more.

[Anonymous]

She just got 50% custody. She does not need more child support, she needs more psychiatric care.

[Anonymous]

Mom shouldn't get 90,000 a month in support, but I'm sure Jon can afford to maybe double the current amount without breaking the bank. If he tries to go to court over such a minuscule amount to his overall income, to me it makes him look like a cheap ass. He probably spends more than the current support number on material crap each month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just read article and do have to say...he makes 2mil a month and only wants to give his son 8k for support? Yes, that's a lot of dough but I also feel like it's such a low amount when compared to his monthly income. If the kid is going to primarily be with mom, he deserves more.

The child has never been primarily with the mother. Here is more info from a couple years ago that tells more of the story
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2031838/Jon-Cryer-forced-pay-ex-wife-8-000-month-child-support-losing-appeal.html

Jon Cryer had custody of his son 96% of the time until recently. That is 50 weeks of the year. His ex-wife had custody of their son for about 14 days a year. 14 days. She has not acted since 2005. She isn’t working and isn’t looking for work. Yet he still had to pay her $8,000 a month ($96,000 per year) in child support to support her even though she barely even had visitation rights. She basically has never contributed a cent towards raising her child. The kids were removed from her care years ago because she wasn't able to look after them.

[Anonymous]

Sounds to me like this is a scenario that could play out in DC or MD.

[Anonymous]

I receive $182 a month in child support. I can't imagine complaining about $8,000!