Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it impossible for the GOP to just say, he's wrong? What he did is wrong and we need to let the DOJ do their jobs and see how bad it is.

They need to condemn his actions. There's no mitigating circumstances, he's in the wrong.

“Being wrong” is for Democrats and minorities and women. Rich white Republican guys can never be wrong because might makes right!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it impossible for the GOP to just say, he's wrong? What he did is wrong and we need to let the DOJ do their jobs and see how bad it is.

They need to condemn his actions. There's no mitigating circumstances, he's in the wrong.

I don’t know but I really miss the days when Republican politicians could at least pretend to uphold norms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it impossible for the GOP to just say, he's wrong? What he did is wrong and we need to let the DOJ do their jobs and see how bad it is.

They need to condemn his actions. There's no mitigating circumstances, he's in the wrong.

It’s a cult and the cult leader takes revenge on anyone who steps out of line. The primaries ended yesterday though so maybe?


Nah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it impossible for the GOP to just say, he's wrong? What he did is wrong and we need to let the DOJ do their jobs and see how bad it is.

They need to condemn his actions. There's no mitigating circumstances, he's in the wrong.

Because they have been rewarded over and over and over again for doubling down. Never admit wrongdoing. That's for the weak. It's the Trump playbook. Their supporters eat this stuff up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities"

There are only 8 countries it could be - UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea & Israel

Israel would be the most interesting, since they've never officially admitted they have nukes.

It could be Iran since the Post says “capabilities.”

[Anonymous]

Where is the poster who said they were sure it was going to be about nuclear power plants. LOL

What say you now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is the poster who said they were sure it was going to be about nuclear power plants. LOL

What say you now?

Maybe he forgot the quotation marks. It's perhaps some country's "nuclear plants". Not nuclear plants. Thus revealing sources and methods.

[Anonymous]

Trump himself has been talking about 'nuclear', how nothing's been found, and so on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it impossible for the GOP to just say, he's wrong? What he did is wrong and we need to let the DOJ do their jobs and see how bad it is.

They need to condemn his actions. There's no mitigating circumstances, he's in the wrong.

It’s a cult and the cult leader takes revenge on anyone who steps out of line. The primaries ended yesterday though so maybe?


Nah.

Well Rubio has a hard senate race coming up - he does not want to lose that to a Black woman, does he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities"

There are only 8 countries it could be - UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea & Israel

Israel would be the most interesting, since they've never officially admitted they have nukes.

It could be Iran since the Post says “capabilities.”

Re-reading this, I think you're right, it probably is Iran. And how do we know? Because loudmouth and chief Trump sycophant Kash Patel has told us. (Remember, Kash was the only person mentioned by name in the DOJ filing.)

Listen to the first couple of minutes of Kash's podcast from March where he says he and Trump think Iran were only a couple of months away from a nuclear weapon and that Trump "closely followed" the intelligence on Iran's nuclear program. And that he couldn't go into details because it was "sensitive and classified," but Trump thinks Iran is close to a nuclear weapon or nuclear weapons grade material.

So why would Trump keep intelligence relating to that? To hide it from the Biden administration?

Kash's podcast https://www.audible.com/pd/Kashs-Corner-A-Weakened-America-and-a-China-Russia-Iran-Alliance-Podcast/B09X65GF2X

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities"

There are only 8 countries it could be - UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea & Israel

Israel would be the most interesting, since they've never officially admitted they have nukes.

It could be Iran since the Post says “capabilities.”

Re-reading this, I think you're right, it probably is Iran. And how do we know? Because loudmouth and chief Trump sycophant Kash Patel has told us. (Remember, Kash was the only person mentioned by name in the DOJ filing.)

Listen to the first couple of minutes of Kash's podcast from March where he says he and Trump think Iran were only a couple of months away from a nuclear weapon and that Trump "closely followed" the intelligence on Iran's nuclear program. And that he couldn't go into details because it was "sensitive and classified," but Trump thinks Iran is close to a nuclear weapon or nuclear weapons grade material.

So why would Trump keep intelligence relating to that? To hide it from the Biden administration?

Kash's podcast https://www.audible.com/pd/Kashs-Corner-A-Weakened-America-and-a-China-Russia-Iran-Alliance-Podcast/B09X65GF2X

If that part is true, how would GOP think this is okay? Trying to harm your successor by hiding national security information got to be absolutely tresonous activity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These Trumpies are so predictable.

What leaks?

Everything we know about so far, we know from official court documents.

Anonymous sources?

[Anonymous]

Why is this taking so long to just get to an arrest or dropped case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is this taking so long to just get to an arrest or dropped case?

One does not go around arresting ex-Presidents without having an absolutely airtight case. Which is hampered now, by the judge's ruling. Obviously, if he's never charged, he's never charged. There is no 'dropped case'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities"

There are only 8 countries it could be - UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea & Israel

Israel would be the most interesting, since they've never officially admitted they have nukes.

It could be Iran since the Post says “capabilities.”

Re-reading this, I think you're right, it probably is Iran. And how do we know? Because loudmouth and chief Trump sycophant Kash Patel has told us. (Remember, Kash was the only person mentioned by name in the DOJ filing.)

Listen to the first couple of minutes of Kash's podcast from March where he says he and Trump think Iran were only a couple of months away from a nuclear weapon and that Trump "closely followed" the intelligence on Iran's nuclear program. And that he couldn't go into details because it was "sensitive and classified," but Trump thinks Iran is close to a nuclear weapon or nuclear weapons grade material.

So why would Trump keep intelligence relating to that? To hide it from the Biden administration?

Kash's podcast https://www.audible.com/pd/Kashs-Corner-A-Weakened-America-and-a-China-Russia-Iran-Alliance-Podcast/B09X65GF2X

If that part is true, how would GOP think this is okay? Trying to harm your successor by hiding national security information got to be absolutely tresonous activity.

I doubt that is the case. I think there is plenty short of that to indict him anyway. More thank likely he was using the information as leverage. It’s not likely the intelligence itself was inaccessible to Biden, just not that particular piece of paper.

-DP