Strong weekend? They played in baby brackets! Total shame for both teams to play below their talent. But great bogus optic for what they want to be the Capital team. |
Agree; that was a nice moment. |
Cool story bro |
Agree that Pride should have been in the second bracket, where they still would have been the highest ranked team. Rest assured that the players and parents at Pride wanted to be playing up. No idea what happened with the scheduling; which was very different from the Fall, and no answers from the club. FWIW, we did want to play Prime Time as well. Notably, FCA beat Prime Time, and Pride handled FCA pretty easily. |
This is nonsensical. The clubs do the scheduling. Last thing that they would be interested in—at least at the Pride Director-level—is creating a “bogus optic” that helps girls leave to Capital. Try a logic check before your next post. |
Then demand answers from KM. Total BS for her not to answer questions but par for the course. |
Who said it was director level? |
The larger point is that Stars and Pride talk big - especially at how their union will make Capital a top 10 team, but they play down to pad their records in tournaments. If they want to be in the discussion, then step up. |
Kind of gay. |
CSB- you think they played in tough brackets? Pride beat everyone by a mile. I did not check about Stars because . . . well, no one cares about Stars. |
CSB aka 1/3 guy has no meaningful answers for this. Pride is not in the top 2 brackets for Lax for the Cure and Stars isn’t even going. |
That is pathetic. |
Big Peckers Tank Top Guy is back!! |
| 2028 (falling) Stars and (Lack of) Pride will be a middle of the road Capital (Feeling) Blue team with the coaches they have lined up. Unless Capital switches up their coaching and mixes in some new players, get ready for a nice #12 ranking in a few years… |
That’s where the scheduling is handled. |