Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Now they BOTH throw things, those stories started late fall 2023

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/royals/prince-william-kate-middleton-trick-for-tantrums/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused
Didn’t they say she’d be back AFTER Easter?

I took me about a month to fully recover from an cyst removal and a month to recover from my c section.

What is all the speculation about?

Yes, there's still weeks before she may reappear. But the rumors are out of control right now. So, people are starting to wonder what is really happening.

And bc the British press knows more than they are allowed to say

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait if William is involved in a crime can Harry be regent?

Well, technically nothing would happen to him because according to archaic law, in the UK it is high treason to sleep with the queen (wife of king), the sovereign’s eldest unmarried daughter, or the wife of the heir to the throne.

But yes, if William were to die before George reaches the age of majority, Harry would be regent. What so many of you don’t seem to get is that it doesn’t really matter what any of them do - talk to the press, whine, scheme, etc. It’s solely about birth. Harry is still one of two children of the reigning sovereign, so he gets the “prize” if it falls his way, and he still outranks almost all of them. He can come home and play Duke at any time.

What happens if wife of heir to throne has an affair? Death penalty?

Nope. This is from the Treason Act of 1351, and women aren’t really 100% people. The blame goes to the person that violated the sovereign’s property and things under his purview. Henry Viii just beheaded his wives because he wanted to.

What happens to the guy that breaks the treason act?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now they BOTH throw things, those stories started late fall 2023

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/royals/prince-william-kate-middleton-trick-for-tantrums/

Holy shit. This timeline important too…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait if William is involved in a crime can Harry be regent?

Well, technically nothing would happen to him because according to archaic law, in the UK it is high treason to sleep with the queen (wife of king), the sovereign’s eldest unmarried daughter, or the wife of the heir to the throne.

But yes, if William were to die before George reaches the age of majority, Harry would be regent. What so many of you don’t seem to get is that it doesn’t really matter what any of them do - talk to the press, whine, scheme, etc. It’s solely about birth. Harry is still one of two children of the reigning sovereign, so he gets the “prize” if it falls his way, and he still outranks almost all of them. He can come home and play Duke at any time.

What happens if wife of heir to throne has an affair? Death penalty?

Saint Diana had several, right?

Yeah and she’s dead.
So….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused
Didn’t they say she’d be back AFTER Easter?

I took me about a month to fully recover from an cyst removal and a month to recover from my c section.

What is all the speculation about?

1) The weirdly edited photo from 2023 they tried to pass off as being from last week (literally the subject of this thread)

2) two strange sightings of Kate in the last week in which she didn't look like herself,

3) some strange behavior from the Kensington Palace comms office-- weighing in on internet rumors (which they never do), the odd mea culpa from Catherine about the weird photo, etc.

4) Some strange behavior from William including looking drunk/drugged at an investiture ceremony, bailing on his godfather's memorial at the last minute, etc.

That's what the speculation is about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this thread allowed to continue for over 200 pages, with some off the wall, completely fabricated theories but any mention of the spare and his wife taken down in minutes?

Because you’re off topic and trying to start a fight.

No and the comment I made was directly in relation to comment about will and Kate being on the outs and how I thought she looked happy unlike the event around the Rose scandal and the in fighting with the brother and his wife. But I used their names and it was deleted. But allegations of secrete pregnancies, divorce, affairs, cancer, being in a coma, Will calling Kate unstable, all completely baseless are still here for everyone to read.

[Anonymous]

Good summary here
https://x.com/drdobberstein/status/1767455526726562153

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused
Didn’t they say she’d be back AFTER Easter?

I took me about a month to fully recover from an cyst removal and a month to recover from my c section.

What is all the speculation about?

1) The weirdly edited photo from 2023 they tried to pass off as being from last week (literally the subject of this thread)

2) two strange sightings of Kate in the last week in which she didn't look like herself,

3) some strange behavior from the Kensington Palace comms office-- weighing in on internet rumors (which they never do), the odd mea culpa from Catherine about the weird photo, etc.

4) Some strange behavior from William including looking drunk/drugged at an investiture ceremony, bailing on his godfather's memorial at the last minute, etc.

That's what the speculation is about.

He looked dazed, tired and upset. Not drunk or drugged.

It was worrisome. His father is sick and his wife is sick. And it showed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused
Didn’t they say she’d be back AFTER Easter?

I took me about a month to fully recover from an cyst removal and a month to recover from my c section.

What is all the speculation about?

1) The weirdly edited photo from 2023 they tried to pass off as being from last week (literally the subject of this thread)

2) two strange sightings of Kate in the last week in which she didn't look like herself,

3) some strange behavior from the Kensington Palace comms office-- weighing in on internet rumors (which they never do), the odd mea culpa from Catherine about the weird photo, etc.

4) Some strange behavior from William including looking drunk/drugged at an investiture ceremony, bailing on his godfather's memorial at the last minute, etc.

That's what the speculation is about.

She looks the car photo here sans sun glasses.
[img] https://media.tatler.com/photos/65f015da2f8568a9b2ca4652/master/w_1600,c_limit/1387844723[img]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did this turn to her being pregnant from an affair and getting an abortion. Is there a link?

Someone linked to twitter where a RF reporter/SM stalker(?) thought Kate may have been pregnant back in Nov/Dec then reported her going to hospital.

https://twitter.com/carmengranddau1/status/1767556234591568233

This is in line with earlier thoughts on the thread of a pregnancy and then complications (hysterectomy/sepsis/overall traumatic emergency).

Preg by Thomas?
Dead Thomas?

To me that seems unlikely, very out of character for such a disciplined person. She's a very contained person, that would be incredibly messy and out of control. She shows no history of being reckless.

If you lived in a loveless, sexless marriage for long enough and your husband was allegedly having an affair and you had a chance at some great sex...?

Ok yes absolutely! 😀 just kidding....it wouldn't just be just sex though, it would be unprotected sex...a big leap and risk for a 42 year old, married mother of three and future Queen of England. She's not a horny, impulsive teenager, you know what I mean? I guess it's possible, it just seems unlikely to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused
Didn’t they say she’d be back AFTER Easter?

I took me about a month to fully recover from an cyst removal and a month to recover from my c section.

What is all the speculation about?

1) The weirdly edited photo from 2023 they tried to pass off as being from last week (literally the subject of this thread)

2) two strange sightings of Kate in the last week in which she didn't look like herself,

3) some strange behavior from the Kensington Palace comms office-- weighing in on internet rumors (which they never do), the odd mea culpa from Catherine about the weird photo, etc.

4) Some strange behavior from William including looking drunk/drugged at an investiture ceremony, bailing on his godfather's memorial at the last minute, etc.

That's what the speculation is about.

She looks the car photo here sans sun glasses.
[img] https://media.tatler.com/photos/65f015da2f8568a9b2ca4652/master/w_1600,c_limit/1387844723[img]

I disagree, and in any case that wasn't the only thing weird about the TMZ photo of Carole and... someone. It was also fascinating that the palace banned UK press from using it. The timing was also weird because it was after that photo got out that they published the doctored MD photo, and done speculate that KP felt pressure to get a different image of Kate out there quickly to squash rumors, and the rush is what led to the horrible Photoshop.

[Anonymous]

Troubling issues:

• Her ‘abdominal surgery’ was ‘planned’, yet a number of prearranged commitments had to be cancelled when she was taken to hospital.

• Prince William has only visited her once in almost 3 months.

• There have been ZERO reported visits from her parents or sister.

• Reports have emerged that Prince William has a "short" and "violent" temper.

• The Media has started talking about Lady Rose Hanbury, who Prince William is allegedly having an affair with.

• Total Media Blackout on Kate’s recovery updates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this thread allowed to continue for over 200 pages, with some off the wall, completely fabricated theories but any mention of the spare and his wife taken down in minutes?

I'm guessing because it's off topic? There's no evidence this has anything to do with H&M.

There's also no evidence that it has to do with an affair, domestic violence, cancer, etc. Not clear why that ONE theory is off limits.

All the speculation about an affair, DV, cancer are linked to speculation about this also happening off DCUM. I think most of that speculation is silly, but if someone wants to post about it, I'm not going to report it as off topic. I guess it's possible that stuff could be true. I hope it's not.

But H&M are in LA and don't even speak to any of these people. They didn't put Kate in the hospital, they aren't running comms for Kensington Palace. Trying to implicate them in any of this is absolutely ludicrous. Whatever your opinion on them, they chose to put a lot of distance between themselves and everyone involved in this mess. It truly has nothing to do with them.

Actually the further this goes along the more it smells like them, especially since their "sources" have decided to comment on the situation. We know that they are extremely jealous of W &K. What likely set them off is Charle's snub and the buzz about William stepping up.


It's honestly starting to smell like a bit of H &M meddling and The Firm setting a trap for them.

How? What did they do? Make a voodoo doll of Kate? Plant that photoshopped photo on Will & Kate's Instagram using one of their allies at Kensington Palace?

Oh right, they don't have allies and magic isn't real. H&M don't have the power or reach to be behind any of this. Youight as well accuse me.

Actually they could totally be the ones planting stories about W&K’s fights, Will’s violent temper and Rose. That would all make a lot of sense coming from them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this thread allowed to continue for over 200 pages, with some off the wall, completely fabricated theories but any mention of the spare and his wife taken down in minutes?

I'm guessing because it's off topic? There's no evidence this has anything to do with H&M.

There's also no evidence that it has to do with an affair, domestic violence, cancer, etc. Not clear why that ONE theory is off limits.

All the speculation about an affair, DV, cancer are linked to speculation about this also happening off DCUM. I think most of that speculation is silly, but if someone wants to post about it, I'm not going to report it as off topic. I guess it's possible that stuff could be true. I hope it's not.

But H&M are in LA and don't even speak to any of these people. They didn't put Kate in the hospital, they aren't running comms for Kensington Palace. Trying to implicate them in any of this is absolutely ludicrous. Whatever your opinion on them, they chose to put a lot of distance between themselves and everyone involved in this mess. It truly has nothing to do with them.

Actually the further this goes along the more it smells like them, especially since their "sources" have decided to comment on the situation. We know that they are extremely jealous of W &K. What likely set them off is Charle's snub and the buzz about William stepping up.


It's honestly starting to smell like a bit of H &M meddling and The Firm setting a trap for them.

How? What did they do? Make a voodoo doll of Kate? Plant that photoshopped photo on Will & Kate's Instagram using one of their allies at Kensington Palace?

Oh right, they don't have allies and magic isn't real. H&M don't have the power or reach to be behind any of this. Youight as well accuse me.

We'll keep it simple. They outright attacked Kate in their little interview.

Would you like to deny that that happened or come up with some excuse that made it okay?


You have your theories. I have mine, time will tell who is right.