| would you willingly admit that your child isn't gifted? |
| yes |
| Don't have a child in AAP, but I'm sure they would. The name was changed already. There would be less that would admit their child isn't academically advanced. |
| heck yes. |
| yep |
| Definitely not gifted. Maybe not even that advanced? Frankly, we were shocked when DC got into AAP. Bright, yes, but not really advanced. |
| I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate. |
Humblebrag
|
How on earth is that a humblebrag? That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both. She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child. Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word. |
|
Based on the common definition, if a kid's IQ is above 130, she/he is gifted.
Many kids in AAP are gifted. |
Is not the point of this post to try and get everybody with a kid in AAP to state that their kid isn't gifted in a sort of "I'm Spartacus" fashion? Some kids are gifted, so everyone can't say that their kid isn't. |
Totally a humblebrag I can say it but those who are experts would never say it. A non humblebrag response would be a yes or no...not with a FSIQ score. |
I don't think you understand the concept of a humblebrag (I prefer the term "VBA" for "Veiled Brag Alert.") there was no humility in the response at all, so pp wasn't humble. |
Disagree..by prefacing by saying he could say it... |
And most are not. The truly gifted make up a tiny % of the population, not the masses they admit to AAP. |