If your child is in AAP ...

Anonymous
would you willingly admit that your child isn't gifted?
Anonymous
yes
Anonymous
Don't have a child in AAP, but I'm sure they would. The name was changed already. There would be less that would admit their child isn't academically advanced.
Anonymous
heck yes.
Anonymous
yep
Anonymous
Definitely not gifted. Maybe not even that advanced? Frankly, we were shocked when DC got into AAP. Bright, yes, but not really advanced.
Anonymous
I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag


How on earth is that a humblebrag?

That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both.

She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child.

Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word.
Anonymous
Based on the common definition, if a kid's IQ is above 130, she/he is gifted.
Many kids in AAP are gifted.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag


How on earth is that a humblebrag?

That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both.

She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child.

Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word.


Is not the point of this post to try and get everybody with a kid in AAP to state that their kid isn't gifted in a sort of "I'm Spartacus" fashion? Some kids are gifted, so everyone can't say that their kid isn't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag


How on earth is that a humblebrag?

That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both.

She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child.

Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word.


Totally a humblebrag I can say it but those who are experts would never say it. A non humblebrag response would be a yes or no...not with a FSIQ score.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag


How on earth is that a humblebrag?

That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both.

She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child.

Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word.


Totally a humblebrag I can say it but those who are experts would never say it. A non humblebrag response would be a yes or no...not with a FSIQ score.


I don't think you understand the concept of a humblebrag (I prefer the term "VBA" for "Veiled Brag Alert.") there was no humility in the response at all, so pp wasn't humble.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I could say it, but he has a FSIQ in the upper 150s and was called "profoundly gifted" by the psychologist who tested him, so I'm not sure it would be accurate.


Humblebrag


How on earth is that a humblebrag?

That poster is either just stating facts, just bragging or a combination of both.

She is being very upfront and not trying to mask her kids intelligence in a veiled put down of her child.

Not a humblebrag by any stretch of the word.


Totally a humblebrag I can say it but those who are experts would never say it. A non humblebrag response would be a yes or no...not with a FSIQ score.


I don't think you understand the concept of a humblebrag (I prefer the term "VBA" for "Veiled Brag Alert.") there was no humility in the response at all, so pp wasn't humble.


Disagree..by prefacing by saying he could say it...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Based on the common definition, if a kid's IQ is above 130, she/he is gifted.
Many kids in AAP are gifted.


And most are not. The truly gifted make up a tiny % of the population, not the masses they admit to AAP.
post reply Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: