Suit by Covington Catholic student against Washington Post dismissed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wrong political climate for smug white jerk who wants to deny women their rights.

Your time is over smug white jerk apologists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that kid is a little sh#t.
But as a parent I’m disappointed in this ruling...

This culture of reporting what is trending is bad for all of us.
He may be a little prick, but the whole thing was misrepresented/misreported by the media for the first day or two.

Raise your kids well and you won't have to worry about things like this.

Raise your kids well, and you won't have to worry that they'll steal, mug, and murder people.

+1
See: NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, etc. etc. So many poorly raised kids thinking they have the right to destroy our cities. I'll take a kid standing still and politely smiling any day.

So you prefer the smug little prick protesting against women’s rights over the people protesting against racial injustice.

That says everything we need to know about you.

DP. He was protesting without destroying anything. That says more than we need to know about YOU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wrong political climate for smug white jerk who wants to deny women their rights.

Your time is over smug white jerk apologists.

That's what you think. Plenty more where he came from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that kid is a little sh#t.
But as a parent I’m disappointed in this ruling...

This culture of reporting what is trending is bad for all of us.
He may be a little prick, but the whole thing was misrepresented/misreported by the media for the first day or two.

Raise your kids well and you won't have to worry about things like this.

Raise your kids well, and you won't have to worry that they'll steal, mug, and murder people.

+1
See: NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, etc. etc. So many poorly raised kids thinking they have the right to destroy our cities. I'll take a kid standing still and politely smiling any day.

So you prefer the smug little prick protesting against women’s rights over the people protesting against racial injustice.

That says everything we need to know about you.

DP. He was protesting without destroying anything. That says more than we need to know about YOU.

Sorry you value a window more than women’s bodily autonomy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wrong political climate for smug white jerk who wants to deny women their rights.

Your time is over smug white jerk apologists.

That's what you think. Plenty more where he came from.

Yes, the breeders pump out new little women-haters every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that kid is a little sh#t.
But as a parent I’m disappointed in this ruling...

This culture of reporting what is trending is bad for all of us.
He may be a little prick, but the whole thing was misrepresented/misreported by the media for the first day or two.

Raise your kids well and you won't have to worry about things like this.

Raise your kids well, and you won't have to worry that they'll steal, mug, and murder people.

+1
See: NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, etc. etc. So many poorly raised kids thinking they have the right to destroy our cities. I'll take a kid standing still and politely smiling any day.

So you prefer the smug little prick protesting against women’s rights over the people protesting against racial injustice.

That says everything we need to know about you.

DP. He was protesting without destroying anything. That says more than we need to know about YOU.

NP. The people protesting aren’t destroying anything. The anarchists and rioters are. Your omission of this fact says more about you.

[Anonymous]

NP. The people protesting aren’t destroying anything. The anarchists and rioters are. Your omission of this fact says more about you.

Not either PP, but the Covington thing was not really about protests--it was about the myth created by the media about Sandmann being rude to Phillips, when it was in reality the other way around.

Remember, CNN had Phillips on television that night and encouraged his telling of his myth of being the hero that day. Phillips created a storyboard that was fictional--and CNN helped. Then, there were not quick corrections. WAPO jumped on and twitter went crazy retweeting falsities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that kid is a little sh#t.
But as a parent I’m disappointed in this ruling...

This culture of reporting what is trending is bad for all of us.
He may be a little prick, but the whole thing was misrepresented/misreported by the media for the first day or two.

Raise your kids well and you won't have to worry about things like this.

Raise your kids well, and you won't have to worry that they'll steal, mug, and murder people.

+1
See: NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, etc. etc. So many poorly raised kids thinking they have the right to destroy our cities. I'll take a kid standing still and politely smiling any day.

So you prefer the smug little prick protesting against women’s rights over the people protesting against racial injustice.

That says everything we need to know about you.

DP. He was protesting without destroying anything. That says more than we need to know about YOU.

NP. The people protesting aren’t destroying anything. The anarchists and rioters are. Your omission of this fact says more about you.

This is a "fact"? You mean that all of the destruction that is going on is NOT in the name of racial injustice? Take off your blinders and take your fingers out of your ears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that kid is a little sh#t.
But as a parent I’m disappointed in this ruling...

This culture of reporting what is trending is bad for all of us.
He may be a little prick, but the whole thing was misrepresented/misreported by the media for the first day or two.

Raise your kids well and you won't have to worry about things like this.

Raise your kids well, and you won't have to worry that they'll steal, mug, and murder people.

+1
See: NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, etc. etc. So many poorly raised kids thinking they have the right to destroy our cities. I'll take a kid standing still and politely smiling any day.

So you prefer the smug little prick protesting against women’s rights over the people protesting against racial injustice.

That says everything we need to know about you.

DP. He was protesting without destroying anything. That says more than we need to know about YOU.

Sorry you value a window more than women’s bodily autonomy.

Nice try. Sorry that you value the life of an unborn child less than a window.

[Anonymous]

The Convington kid is the highest paid person at the Washington comPost

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NP. The people protesting aren’t destroying anything. The anarchists and rioters are. Your omission of this fact says more about you.

Not either PP, but the Covington thing was not really about protests--it was about the myth created by the media about Sandmann being rude to Phillips, when it was in reality the other way around.

Remember, CNN had Phillips on television that night and encouraged his telling of his myth of being the hero that day. Phillips created a storyboard that was fictional--and CNN helped. Then, there were not quick corrections. WAPO jumped on and twitter went crazy retweeting falsities.

CNN selectively edited the video to further the narrative which ultimately is why they had to settle. The media is objectively dishonest and has surrendered accuracy for clicks and views.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NP. The people protesting aren’t destroying anything. The anarchists and rioters are. Your omission of this fact says more about you.

Not either PP, but the Covington thing was not really about protests--it was about the myth created by the media about Sandmann being rude to Phillips, when it was in reality the other way around.

Remember, CNN had Phillips on television that night and encouraged his telling of his myth of being the hero that day. Phillips created a storyboard that was fictional--and CNN helped. Then, there were not quick corrections. WAPO jumped on and twitter went crazy retweeting falsities.

+1. This whole incident is about the false narrative that the MSM, including the Post, created, and how the left persists in adhering to it despite clear evidence it was contrived.

And the irony is that some of these people - apart from the gays without kids who refer disparagingly to "breeders" - would bust a nut if someone even frowned at one of their own kids on a playground.

I hope Sandmann ended up getting a nice settlement from the Post in the federal court action.

[Anonymous]

Regardless of how much he settled for, Sandman will not see much of that money. Most of that money will go to the lawyers that he hired. They get paid big bucks out of any payout. My guess is that they will get more than half of what he received and he will get less than half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Regardless of how much he settled for, Sandman will not see much of that money. Most of that money will go to the lawyers that he hired. They get paid big bucks out of any payout. My guess is that they will get more than half of what he received and he will get less than half.

I'm sure that when you add it to the CNN settlement, plus any future settlements from the 6 remaining lawsuits, he will have done just fine.

Either way, these are victories for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Convington kid is the highest paid person at the Washington comPost

Literally GUFFAWED when I read this post!!!