Posters your sick of!

[Anonymous]

ranting in general is annoying. People who rant cannot discuss. A late famous ranter that comes to mind is Kim Jung Ill. All around annoying blowhard.

[Anonymous]

I agree, ranters are so boring. I think only the ranters think they themselves are interesting and witty (and 15:04 is probably RA but logged off).

And did RA really not absorb anything about "your" vs. "you're" from the last 21 pages of this thread???? If the ranters are really dumb, this makes it so much more painful.

[Anonymous]

I think you are AWESOME Ranting Atheist, keep at it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:buttjam.

You need to use wet wipes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

RantingAtheist wrote:
You make an excellent point. People who return over-and-over to etiolated grouse-fests, and do nothing but add a single dribble to the mountain of existing bile are truly stupid, attention-seeking, and pathetic. They deserve our sympathies, not our scorn.

Posters who try to be witty by using words like "etiolate" that they clearly don't understand, and who-use-too-many-hyphens, so that instead of looking witty they look pompous and uneducated. Not to mention, unintentionally creating bizarre images of pale woodland birds and tall mountains (instead of pools/puddles) of liquids like bile.

Are you trying to model exactly what you're attempting to berate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHEEPLE.

Are you my soul mate in the Conspiracy Theory World?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think you are AWESOME Ranting Atheist, keep at it!

The RA is a notorious sock puppet. Wouldn't trust this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think you are AWESOME Ranting Atheist, keep at it!

The RA is a notorious sock puppet. Wouldn't trust this.

Nonsense. There are many of us who agree with RA.

But there is no proof in anonymous online fora. You will just have to take on faith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think you are AWESOME Ranting Atheist, keep at it!

The RA is a notorious sock puppet. Wouldn't trust this.

Nonsense. There are many of us who agree with RA.

But there is no proof in anonymous online fora. You will just have to take on faith.

Sure, I'm willing to bet there are other atheists here. But here's the point: I doubt they agree with your obnoxious approach. In fact, a fellow atheist was complaining about you just a few pages ago, and how you made other atheists look bad.

And "many" atheists? Really? Sure, you guys are really loud, and you guys post all the time. (Some day, one of you can explain to me why atheists seem to be more obsessed with religion than believers, but that's a a sidetrack from our discussion here.) But 3-4 people being loud and posting all the time doesn't equal "many."

[Anonymous]

Atheism IS a religion. Don't listen to them. The only ones with brains are agnostics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Atheism IS a religion. Don't listen to them. The only ones with brains are agnostics.

Good point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think you are AWESOME Ranting Atheist, keep at it!

And then you guys whinge here about how atheists are the most hated group in America. After you behave like playground bullies on DCUM. Help me understand: Is this some kind of narcicism disorder? Or are all atheists totally lacking a sense of irony?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Atheism IS a religion. Don't listen to them. The only ones with brains are agnostics.

Aren't agnostics just atheists in denial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Atheism IS a religion. Don't listen to them. The only ones with brains are agnostics.

Aren't agnostics just atheists in denial?

No, they are the ones who are rational and humble enough to accept that they don't know everything about everything.

[Anonymous]

Richard Dawkins says he's agnostic--because he feels like 99% atheist, but there's that niggling 1% uncertainty. Not that humble is a word I'd use to describe him, but rational seems apt.