Meghan Markle twerking video

[Anonymous]

I would love to know from Jeff how many people post in this thread over and over again. I mean, the writing styles are the same, the lack of response is pretty consistent....Idk, I definitely think there are a few people who live on these Meghan Markle threads.

He won't do it because he's said before these threads bore him and I agree. I've posted in this thread like two or three times this morning and am about to tap out due to the crazies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Behavior Panel Scott Rouse analysis of dancing video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6edbo/meghan_markles_pregnancy_real_or_staged_delivery/

Thanks. We'll really take a Meghan Markle hate subreddit seriously! Great source!

Someone on that subreddit linked Scott Rouse's youtube video.

I should have given the direct youtube link. I have no idea about the comments there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Behavior Panel Scott Rouse analysis of dancing video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6edbo/meghan_markles_pregnancy_real_or_staged_delivery/

Thanks. We'll really take a Meghan Markle hate subreddit seriously! Great source!

Someone on that subreddit linked Scott Rouse's youtube video.

I should have given the direct youtube link. I have no idea about the comments there.

I just posted some of them for you. Calling 31 years old "geriatric" and b itching and moaning that she should've looked more "pensive."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.

TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….

Define relevant. Nobody would recognize her in an average town in America. She’s a nobody. A sideshow some gossip readers laugh at when they see her in a tabloid? Dream big.

You would.

I absolutely would not. When she’s not in a $10,000 dress with professional hair, makeup and toadie editors and photographers, she looks like an unremarkable basic middle class white mom. She doesn’t have stunning good looks or some captivating aura. And she’s not famous for anything anymore. Maybe at the height of the wedding stuff 7 years ago people would be buzzing? But that was pre-Covid. The world has evolved. Nobody cares about this shit anymore.

Given that she’s now onto her third Netflix season, you are obviously objectively wrong about the bolded.

The rest sounds like the ranting of a crazed obsessive.

A low budget streaming cooking show some people watched (how many, we have no idea) to universally mock is "success"? Celebs coming out of the woodwork to take potshots at them is "success"? They're a laughing stock. A punchline. A joke.

Delusional take. Netflix doesn’t do charity work and their cost is high. But the crazies here are entertaining, at least.

[Anonymous]

I don't hate Meghan, I put her in the same category as the Kardashians. I just find their constant attempts to get attention obnoxious and everything they do gets a lot of traction so you see it whether you want to or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.

TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….

Define relevant. Nobody would recognize her in an average town in America. She’s a nobody. A sideshow some gossip readers laugh at when they see her in a tabloid? Dream big.

You would.

I absolutely would not. When she’s not in a $10,000 dress with professional hair, makeup and toadie editors and photographers, she looks like an unremarkable basic middle class white mom. She doesn’t have stunning good looks or some captivating aura. And she’s not famous for anything anymore. Maybe at the height of the wedding stuff 7 years ago people would be buzzing? But that was pre-Covid. The world has evolved. Nobody cares about this shit anymore.

Given that she’s now onto her third Netflix season, you are obviously objectively wrong about the bolded.

The rest sounds like the ranting of a crazed obsessive.

A low budget streaming cooking show some people watched (how many, we have no idea) to universally mock is "success"? Celebs coming out of the woodwork to take potshots at them is "success"? They're a laughing stock. A punchline. A joke.

Delusional take. Netflix doesn’t do charity work and their cost is high. But the crazies here are entertaining, at least.

Their insistence that Netflix is doing this just to be nice is insane.

It was a good show and the haters are delusional so they can't accept that.

[Anonymous]

Cute!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan behaves like a child doing whatever it takes to get attention. She must have been ignored during her childhood.

Comes from a dysfunctional family and carries the genes of her dad and his side of the family (as described by her in her own words, they're problematic), so not surprising at all that she has emotional problems, too..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Behavior Panel Scott Rouse analysis of dancing video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6edbo/meghan_markles_pregnancy_real_or_staged_delivery/

Thanks. We'll really take a Meghan Markle hate subreddit seriously! Great source!

And what’s glorious is that sub is baths!t crazy. I love how the PP shared it thinking that it gives credence to their crazy conspiracy theories.

Bunch of hating nutters here. Goodness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted photos of her daughter and no one really cared, so she posted this in the hope of at least getting some kind of reaction. Again, no one really cared.

I don't know. Remember the other Markle thread? It was tons of pages long. This one will blow up too, watch. People love to say that don't care, but they definitely do.

It won’t blow up, because people who are convinced they’re Doing The Work will report “offensive” posts to Jeff should they criticize Markle. It’ll get shut down by tomorrow.

Say what, now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Behavior Panel Scott Rouse analysis of dancing video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6edbo/meghan_markles_pregnancy_real_or_staged_delivery/

Not the MM hate subreddit! Any pearls of wisdom from Lady C you want to share too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted photos of her daughter and no one really cared, so she posted this in the hope of at least getting some kind of reaction. Again, no one really cared.

I don't know. Remember the other Markle thread? It was tons of pages long. This one will blow up too, watch. People love to say that don't care, but they definitely do.

It won’t blow up, because people who are convinced they’re Doing The Work will report “offensive” posts to Jeff should they criticize Markle. It’ll get shut down by tomorrow.

Say what, now?

What does "Doing The Work" mean? Why do the Markle freaks always have their own lingo. It's like people with weird nicknames for her. You guys aren't that funny or witty, Idk why you even try?

These threads never die because someone even admitted in the last MM thread that they post to an anti-Meghan forum and encourage people to come here and post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Behavior Panel Scott Rouse analysis of dancing video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6edbo/meghan_markles_pregnancy_real_or_staged_delivery/

Thanks. We'll really take a Meghan Markle hate subreddit seriously! Great source!

And what’s glorious is that sub is baths!t crazy. I love how the PP shared it thinking that it gives credence to their crazy conspiracy theories.

Bunch of hating nutters here. Goodness.

The posts from that sub are hysterical.

If you have an Instagram, let’s band together and block her. (Don’t worry — I’m sure we can still snark at the posts about her posts via archived links. The British news always finds a way to cover her antics — even though the American news is getting increasingly disinterested.)

Call me crazy, but if I hated someone as much as these people claim to hate Meghan, I would have blocked her when she first came back on IG.

how two royal wives celebrate their daughters birthday....... Catherine posts a beautiful natural photo & markle

sl ut drops in the surrogacy waiting room of the Santa Barbara Hospital in a black dress & stillettos !!

Charming - ,the difference says it all !

"Sl ut drops" made me laugh, to this poster's credit.

The Wales' kids are constantly seen dutifully serving/training... whereas A and L are duty dodging life away in the UK with ZERO training/service under their belt.

Ah yes. Why aren't these preschoolers working hard enough?

She needs middle-aged financially secure women because they have the money. But Megsie herself wants to be seen as a young hottie-patootie, still flashing the goods and attracting the men. These two things are at odds, because middle-aged women find that unbecoming and they want to follow or be inspired by a woman of substance, a woman who has achieved something beyond a stripper dance.

"Flashing the goods and attracting the men" here meaning "heavily pregnant and wearing a nightgown"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.

This.

And she’s smart enough to know her Q score hangs on her social media followers and views coupled with more mainstream media mentions. She’s boosting her metrics whenever her haters click. This thread is serving a purpose: driving people to links.

That’s fine I guess. If this is how she and Harry want to make money, then that’s their choice.

I’m just surprised that it continues to work…and that they seemingly don’t mind that they are equally loved and hated.

The video is dumb, not cute. It seems heavily produced. They probably had someone shoot multiple takes. Private moments should be private moments.

I don’t get all the surrogacy rumors. She definitely gained weight and looks pregnant all over her body. I’m sure someone can pull up pics when she was pregnant and was clearly retaining water (puffy face, round shoulders/arms, etc).

I love a good conspiracy theory and have read how celebs such as Beyoncé get into character and take (I think) thyroid meds to bloat, gain.

Faux pregnancies besides Beyonce include the Kelly Preston Travolta, Sarah Palin and I earnestly believe, Megan Markle. Also they brought a doll baby to the introductory Archie event.

I love this so much. So they brought out a doll as their child and took pictures with the doll, and introduced the queen, prince Philip, charles etc — to the doll? Why a doll and not a borrowed newborn? When did they transition to borrowing a real child for photo ops? Do you believe they have any children in their custody today? When will this all be revealed in MSM?

PP quoted and I do believe it was all staged. And o believe the few times the children have been photographed they are borrowed from friends, rent a child style.

Read somewhere that one theory is that Harry indeed had a real life child who lives in England with his birth mother.

No, I can’t believe that Harry and Megan have anything near FT custody of 2DC - so much talk of “school” yet no photos (paparazzi) of kids, ever. No nanny has come forward. No fellow parents, no neighbors not even any of her “friends ds” featured in her Netflix show had any firsthand knowledge of either kid - just Megan blathering g on about the children and tell stories about them to her “friends.”

I do not believe they are parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who actually loathe media attention and truly want privacy don’t post. Period.

But she needs the money.

This.

And she’s smart enough to know her Q score hangs on her social media followers and views coupled with more mainstream media mentions. She’s boosting her metrics whenever her haters click. This thread is serving a purpose: driving people to links.

That’s fine I guess. If this is how she and Harry want to make money, then that’s their choice.

I’m just surprised that it continues to work…and that they seemingly don’t mind that they are equally loved and hated.

The video is dumb, not cute. It seems heavily produced. They probably had someone shoot multiple takes. Private moments should be private moments.

I don’t get all the surrogacy rumors. She definitely gained weight and looks pregnant all over her body. I’m sure someone can pull up pics when she was pregnant and was clearly retaining water (puffy face, round shoulders/arms, etc).

I love a good conspiracy theory and have read how celebs such as Beyoncé get into character and take (I think) thyroid meds to bloat, gain.

Faux pregnancies besides Beyonce include the Kelly Preston Travolta, Sarah Palin and I earnestly believe, Megan Markle. Also they brought a doll baby to the introductory Archie event.

I love this so much. So they brought out a doll as their child and took pictures with the doll, and introduced the queen, prince Philip, charles etc — to the doll? Why a doll and not a borrowed newborn? When did they transition to borrowing a real child for photo ops? Do you believe they have any children in their custody today? When will this all be revealed in MSM?

PP quoted and I do believe it was all staged. And o believe the few times the children have been photographed they are borrowed from friends, rent a child style.

Read somewhere that one theory is that Harry indeed had a real life child who lives in England with his birth mother.

No, I can’t believe that Harry and Megan have anything near FT custody of 2DC - so much talk of “school” yet no photos (paparazzi) of kids, ever. No nanny has come forward. No fellow parents, no neighbors not even any of her “friends ds” featured in her Netflix show had any firsthand knowledge of either kid - just Megan blathering g on about the children and tell stories about them to her “friends.”

I do not believe they are parents.

This post is all the evidence you need we are living in a mental health crisis in real-time.