lol |
That is 100% what the OP's outrage is about. When they say they want FA to go to the "truly needy" they mean "people we can see are poorer than us, because of the kind of house where they live." And if it weren't houses it would be something else -- vacations, cars, shoes. You can easily imagine the threads: "People whose kids wear brand name clothes but getting significant financial aid!" or "FA family turned down my secondhand clothes??" Bluntly, if it's a priority for your kid to be in classrooms with truly needy students, public school is right there. What the outraged posters want is to be around a limited number of carefully screened families who are needy enough to be grateful/cowed. |
What would be ideal is if there was a sliding scale for tuition based on adjusted gross income - or something. At my private, tuition feels like MSRP and it feels obnoxious for me, someone who has never taken a break from working to be home with my kids & carefully plans tuition coverage, to be subsidizing financial aid for a SAHM with a Chanel bag whose wealthy parents are financing the rest. That is a real life scenario at my school based on people I know receive aid. we will just apply for aid at some point and see if/what we get. |
| at our school i know 2 stay at home moms who have older kids 6th grade + that get financial aid and make over 200k a year. get a damn job! they wear nice clothes and dive similar cars to the rest of the school. |
Convenient how your argument supports giving less FA to low-income students. Let’s put that on the website and in the viewbook, shall we? FA only for people with enough money that we don’t feel uncomfortable around them. But look at all our diversity and inclusion!! |
For the umpteenth time, nobody on this thread sets the school FA policy. They can fund whoever they want, but they do not fund the people you say you want them to. I think the reasons are understandable, if not admirable. The school's primary mission is not diversity, just like most families are not there for diversity. If that is your starting framework, then the diversity that most schools do achieve - race, ethnicity, religion, family background, and yes economic within a narrow band - is notable IMO. It could definitely be worse. |
200k a year is not a huge sum, the issue is more 300k. I sah. My clothes come from Walmart as they have free returns. Health issues keep me from working and shopping. You never know what’s going on. |
So you know these women well? Know their family situations? Know for sure they have no physical or mental health disabilities, have no elderly parents or other dependents they spend hours caring for, have no home-based or part time business on the side, don’t buy knockoffs or second-hand clothes or used cars to save money? You must be pretty good friends to know their financial situations so intimately, but you’re so condescending and dismissive. Do you treat all your friends that way? |
NP, but everyone has a mental health disorder or disability in 2024. Plenty of them work. Get over yourself. |
But my kid isn’t at a HS for the arts. Maybe you could rethink (1) for an arts HS or some such. My kid is at a HS for academics. That’s why (1) isn’t for their cooking skills. Sports plays a role beyond the specific kid. Alumnae give $$ when then basketball or football team does well. It builds community when kids show up and cheer and take pride in their institution. I hate the building a diverse socioeconomic class. I think it breeds resentment, see this thread. I think humans are really bad at it. They make mistakes. They are biased in their selections. It’s much harder to get the socioeconomic diversity right than straight academics of the child. I’ve lost this battle in DC and know I’m in the minority. But clearly lots of folks are unhappy with the status quo. |
No, they don’t know any of these things. No one on this thread getting worked up over hearsay and rumors knows any of these details, they just assume things so they can feel superior and look down on others. How many other people do you specifically know their income, their expenses, their financial and personal situation? Basically none. Out of thousands of private school students, I’m sure there are people who manipulate the system. But it’s not likely that you know their details. |
I don’t see any evidence of DMV privates building a diverse socioeconomic class? I think the point of this thread has been that FA goes to professional class families, not low income families. Or is your point that FA should not exist. (Genuine q.) |
Pp you’re responding to, and I think you missed that my point was basically what you’re saying. There’s no way that person knows the details of these families they are getting riled up about. There could be perfectly legitimate reasons they are getting FA. And as many have stated, the schools get to decide what counts as “legitimate” anyway, not DCUM randos with a superiority complex. |
|
Is the NYT guilty of lazily using DCUM to generate high-engagement story ideas?
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/03/nyregion/nyc-private-school-tuition.html?unlocked_article_code=1.f04.9sUs.T3F3F1hT0z06&smid=url-share |
No, I got it, was agreeing with you (sorry if it didn’t come across that way). Was just trying to put an extra emphasis on the absurdity of it. |