Anonymous wrote:So I read this article on the Hilaria "scandal"
https://people.com/tv/why-the-hilaria-baldwin-scandal-isnt-funny-its-painful-for-millions-of-immigrants-including-me/
The author makes a solid case for why it upsets her when a woman begins identifying as a member of another culture and affecting a Spanish accent and reaping the benefits that brings (because in Hilaria's case, it definitely has brought her some benefits or she wouldn't keep at it).
The author points out that Hilaria shed her privilege of being a very Americanized non-accented woman to appropriate an immigrant's existence and then reaps accolades and positive attention for her "diversity"--while "American immigrants from all over the world--particularly immigrants of color--are ridiculed or ostracized or given fewer opportunities..." And she's not wrong.
She then points out that many of these immigrants "bend over backward to try to find a place in society that still largely rejects them."
And it struck me that those same quotes can be used to describe women in society.
And yet, women are expected to remain silent and accommodating when males put on makeup and heels (in the name of feminism? I guess?) and declare themselves to be women as though this were perfectly reasonable. Instantly, their "male privilege" is cast aside and just by self-proclamation, a transgender woman is permitted to compete in women's sports where they dominate female athletes? Can be given scholarships that are meant to advance women, and can even be named Woman of the Year (by the same magazine that ran this article telling us it's offensive for a white American woman to develop an affinity for Spanish culture and affect a Spanish accent) and generally women are just meant to accept this. To sit down and be quiet and applaud in the name of diversity. Interesting world.