Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now (PART TWO)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was listening on the way to work. Was that segment with Danni having "phantom contractions" a repeat? I didn't remember hearing it before and when I started listening this morning, that bit was on and it sounded like they were trying (poorly) to explain her absence.

Which, by the way, that was so dramatic and over the top. She relived her night of contractions? Woke up during the "strong" ones?? LOL She's sooooooooooo dramatic! I have two kids too, and yes, I've gotten "phantom kicks" but debilitating contractions, no. And, she didn't even go to the hospital? She called her MOM? Yeah...ok...because last time I had contractions, I took my butt to the hospital! LOL

Anyway, had to get that out. Was that segment today a repeat?

Yes, that segment was repeat and was done back around the time her second child turned 1 year old. She was trying to say she was having contractions at the same time she gave birth a year prior.

[Anonymous]

Was Def a repeat because she said she was having them on the baby's birthday because her body "remembered" having the contractions a year prior.....ooooookay!

Just wanted to jump in a say....clearly we do not know the whole story of what went down/is going down between Kane and Natasha....but from what I (in my personal, unmedical opinion) see is that Natasha seems to be sort of manic and unstable at times. It seems her highs are really high and her lows are just plain scary. That being said, I suffer from OCD and anxiety and know from personal experience how it can make a person act and feel, so I am sure Kane has his own share of demons and probably isn't quite as stable either. I have sensed a real change in his on-air personality since this whole separation and divorce started between them.
I don't think either one of them is truly in a "good place" right now.

[Anonymous]

Thanks ya'll for clearing that up for me! Must've missed the part where she mentioned that it was DC's 1st birthday.

[Anonymous]

From DCRTV:

I wonder if Kane got suspended for something. The last 45 minutes of yesterday show as rerun and today show is a rerun. I don't know what is going on. Apparently, the replayed the divorce clip at 9:30 yesterday, and put other clips in the podcast (2/23/16)

I remember a story on NBC 4 about (Pete) Kane and his family a few years ago. I think it was about depression. Sad to hear he is divorced. (2/23/16)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From DCRTV:

I wonder if Kane got suspended for something. The last 45 minutes of yesterday show as rerun and today show is a rerun. I don't know what is going on. Apparently, the replayed the divorce clip at 9:30 yesterday, and put other clips in the podcast (2/23/16)

I remember a story on NBC 4 about (Pete) Kane and his family a few years ago. I think it was about depression. Sad to hear he is divorced. (2/23/16)

Did they really replay the divorce clip yesterday??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From DCRTV:

I wonder if Kane got suspended for something. The last 45 minutes of yesterday show as rerun and today show is a rerun. I don't know what is going on. Apparently, the replayed the divorce clip at 9:30 yesterday, and put other clips in the podcast (2/23/16)

I remember a story on NBC 4 about (Pete) Kane and his family a few years ago. I think it was about depression. Sad to hear he is divorced. (2/23/16)

Did they really replay the divorce clip yesterday??

No, they did not play the divorce clip. DCRTV saw the posts on this website yesterday and somehow misunderstood and thought that the announcement was made yesterday for the first time live. They then posted a small blurb on their website dcrtv.com for a few hours saying that Kane was on the radio announcing his divorce. After they realized their mistake, they pulled the news off their website, but I guess there were people who visit the website that were unaware of his impending divorce and sent a few things to the site's mailbag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From DCRTV:

I wonder if Kane got suspended for something. The last 45 minutes of yesterday show as rerun and today show is a rerun. I don't know what is going on. Apparently, the replayed the divorce clip at 9:30 yesterday, and put other clips in the podcast (2/23/16)

I remember a story on NBC 4 about (Pete) Kane and his family a few years ago. I think it was about depression. Sad to hear he is divorced. (2/23/16)

Did they really replay the divorce clip yesterday??

No, they did not play the divorce clip. DCRTV saw the posts on this website yesterday and somehow misunderstood and thought that the announcement was made yesterday for the first time live. They then posted a small blurb on their website dcrtv.com for a few hours saying that Kane was on the radio announcing his divorce. After they realized their mistake, they pulled the news off their website, but I guess there were people who visit the website that were unaware of his impending divorce and sent a few things to the site's mailbag.

Lame. DCRTV needs to get it together.

[Anonymous]

For those of you that have mentioned the video about Kane and his OCD on NBC4, here is the video:

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/health/Kane-Reveals-His-Battle-With-OCD_Washington-DC-302514461.html

It first aired last May, ironically, right around the time Natasha actually supposedly took the kids and went to Florida for at least a few days or maybe longer depending on the story you believe.

I remember the most irritating thing about this segment was the fact that the reporter and the captions kept listing "Kane" as his last name. She was calling him "Pete Kane" and his wife was "Natasha Kane". Why not just call them Pete and Natasha?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of you that have mentioned the video about Kane and his OCD on NBC4, here is the video:

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/health/Kane-Reveals-His-Battle-With-OCD_Washington-DC-302514461.html

It first aired last May, ironically, right around the time Natasha actually supposedly took the kids and went to Florida for at least a few days or maybe longer depending on the story you believe.

I remember the most irritating thing about this segment was the fact that the reporter and the captions kept listing "Kane" as his last name. She was calling him "Pete Kane" and his wife was "Natasha Kane". Why not just call them Pete and Natasha?

He looks so sweaty and schlumpy in that package. Ick.

[Anonymous]

I'm a 25 year old dude bored at work so I thought I'd write this out -

I'm not someone who was anti-Danni, but I'd like to review some stuff that makes me think she might be done (or definitely suspended):

Two Weeks ago - Wednesday?? - Show was live with Danni. After a pre-taped segment, the show came back as a repeat. That was the last time we heard Danni (in studio).

Someone on facebook comments that she heard Kane and Danni got in a fight on that same day and was suspended (which might explain why the show came back as a repeat).

The show makes zero mention of Danni being gone in the next few days. Something odd if a cast member is out.

Danni tweets about disloyalty and isn't clear with anyone about her return. Also, in a social media comment (FB or IG, can't remember) she doesn't give a straight answer as to why she is gone.

Kane says she'll be back on Thursday. That return is just a phone interview in the 8:10-8:30 segment.

Kane cuts to repeats Monday for the last hour and all day Tuesday. DCRTV wonders if he got suspended.

Something went down, fellas. Also, IJ is facebooking for the show, meaning he is not off today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of you that have mentioned the video about Kane and his OCD on NBC4, here is the video:

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/health/Kane-Reveals-His-Battle-With-OCD_Washington-DC-302514461.html

It first aired last May, ironically, right around the time Natasha actually supposedly took the kids and went to Florida for at least a few days or maybe longer depending on the story you believe.

I remember the most irritating thing about this segment was the fact that the reporter and the captions kept listing "Kane" as his last name. She was calling him "Pete Kane" and his wife was "Natasha Kane". Why not just call them Pete and Natasha?

I never saw this clip when it aired, but I just watched it. It made me feel sad for them. You can tell they had a rough marriage at times, hence all of the breaking up before even getting married. I just feel sad for them and the kids that it didn't work out and now it's so nasty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I still think she should have considered that before she made such a douche move that she made by abandoning him in the manner she did. Like she didn't know his image and show are one of the priorities. And people separate /divorce everyday. They don't have to do it in such have an over the top manner. She thought she had the upper hand. Her family has defended her, but not one of them said that the manner that she choose to do it Is made up. She's just playing the victim. When truthfully she should've stood by her man.

You do realize that Peter filed for a divorce right? Also, her family disputed that the story about how she left wasn't true. Those comments were deleted, so I can't link them, but if anybody here read them, please chime in about the story from her mom and sister's end.

You're basing everything off of what you heard Kane say on the radio. I for one think he made some of that story up, but we have also only heard his side of the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I still think she should have considered that before she made such a douche move that she made by abandoning him in the manner she did. Like she didn't know his image and show are one of the priorities. And people separate /divorce everyday. They don't have to do it in such have an over the top manner. She thought she had the upper hand. Her family has defended her, but not one of them said that the manner that she choose to do it Is made up. She's just playing the victim. When truthfully she should've stood by her man.

You do realize that Peter filed for a divorce right? Also, her family disputed that the story about how she left wasn't true. Those comments were deleted, so I can't link them, but if anybody here read them, please chime in about the story from her mom and sister's end.

You're basing everything off of what you heard Kane say on the radio. I for one think he made some of that story up, but we have also only heard his side of the story.

Except that we have confirmed that neither she nor her family supporters (mother, sister) ever refuted that she took the kids, dog and money while leaving a massive amount of unpaid bills. Barring physical abuse, I see no reason to exhibit such dramatic and extreme behavior when deciding to leave your spouse. And she was the one that said that there was no abuse or cheating...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I still think she should have considered that before she made such a douche move that she made by abandoning him in the manner she did. Like she didn't know his image and show are one of the priorities. And people separate /divorce everyday. They don't have to do it in such have an over the top manner. She thought she had the upper hand. Her family has defended her, but not one of them said that the manner that she choose to do it Is made up. She's just playing the victim. When truthfully she should've stood by her man.

You do realize that Peter filed for a divorce right? Also, her family disputed that the story about how she left wasn't true. Those comments were deleted, so I can't link them, but if anybody here read them, please chime in about the story from her mom and sister's end.

You're basing everything off of what you heard Kane say on the radio. I for one think he made some of that story up, but we have also only heard his side of the story.

Except that we have confirmed that neither she nor her family supporters (mother, sister) ever refuted that she took the kids, dog and money while leaving a massive amount of unpaid bills. Barring physical abuse, I see no reason to exhibit such dramatic and extreme behavior when deciding to leave your spouse. And she was the one that said that there was no abuse or cheating...

But regardless, we don't know the whole story and it's sad that it's playing out this way when there are children involved. They are both being immature, petty and spiteful, but I suppose that's par for the course in these types of situations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I still think she should have considered that before she made such a douche move that she made by abandoning him in the manner she did. Like she didn't know his image and show are one of the priorities. And people separate /divorce everyday. They don't have to do it in such have an over the top manner. She thought she had the upper hand. Her family has defended her, but not one of them said that the manner that she choose to do it Is made up. She's just playing the victim. When truthfully she should've stood by her man.

You do realize that Peter filed for a divorce right? Also, her family disputed that the story about how she left wasn't true. Those comments were deleted, so I can't link them, but if anybody here read them, please chime in about the story from her mom and sister's end.

You're basing everything off of what you heard Kane say on the radio. I for one think he made some of that story up, but we have also only heard his side of the story.

Except that we have confirmed that neither she nor her family supporters (mother, sister) ever refuted that she took the kids, dog and money while leaving a massive amount of unpaid bills. Barring physical abuse, I see no reason to exhibit such dramatic and extreme behavior when deciding to leave your spouse. And she was the one that said that there was no abuse or cheating...

Just because they didn’t refuse it doesn’t mean it is true… I think right now it’s kind of up in the air. I just felt that his story was so dramatic and crazy that it didn’t seem 100% true.