I don't think this is objectively superior to a bowl of pasta. |
Um, so you're agreeing with me? My point was that OP's offer to continue the playdate was more important than what she offered for lunch. |
|
How could she have declined to eat? It was the only thing available to eat. Just... sit there with the bowl of pasta served in front of her and not eat? |
Okay, so I'm judging your nuggets and frozen pizza a lot harder than a bowl of pasta. This just goes to show that what people think is "better" is completely subjective. OP, please finagle an impromptu lunch invite to your guest's house next time, and see what she serves you. Feel free to raise your eyebrows expressively and give her a long, appraising look before you silently tuck into whatever the F she dishes out. |
It is objectively better, but not subjectively, of course. |
Oh, come on, it's just a tiny snifter! |
But why judge that's so rude! See how easy it is? But if you prefer your friends to blow smoke up your not knowing how to cook ass, then that is a personal choice. |
| Come on fake Italian where did you go? |
You probably shouldn't accept invitations at people's houses. |
No, it is not better in either sense. |
Find the fault. OP basically offered bread & butter. Point out exactly why this is inferior. |
| Usually I chat with someone before offering food ("Hey is PB&J okay" "I'm making chicken kebabs for the party"). If they want something else they can say no or bring their own thing. |
| I don't know... I love eating other people's food. A simple bowl of pasta warmly served to me, in good company, is just as good as any. It doesn't have to be a dietician's dream bowl of food. |
I'm not going to eat other people's food just to prove a point. I might pick at it but that's as good as it will get. If the people cared that much about it they would probably solicit opinions first to find out what their guests like. OP didn't really care and just made what she and her kids wanted. |