Schools most harmed and those most benefiting once NIH, DHS funding resumes?

[Anonymous]

Safest schools may be the smallest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of US research funding has been absolute garbage. The STEM research too.

I look at recent research papers at my kids R1 school and 80% of social science papers are DEI garbage. We don’t need more of this junk.

Maybe you simply don't understand the research and are parroting right wing BS?

I'm not a MAGA troll, but NIH funds a lot of soft science research.

Trolly response right there. You understand neither NIH research nor funding.

Couldn't be further from maga... it's not soft science, it's social science. Psychology research is primarily funded through the nimh, nichd, niaaa, Nida, etc. I'd argue as a psychologist this is important life saving work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it begins.

NIH lowers allowable indirect costs from 60% to 15%.

Seismic.

Indirect costs pay for the building maintenance, admin salaries, utilities, etc.

Johns Hopkins going to get slaughtered.

Yup. I am at Hopkins. We are in shock.

Hopkins will not get slaughtered. I doubt you are there. Internal contingency planning already underway without alarm.

Dp who works there. Absolutely not true, everyone is shocked and beyond alarmed.

They along with other universities will be impacted. See Penn and others. Stop making it sound like Hopkins will be disproportionately impacte. They have a separate medical endowment and revenue streams.

The ultra rich SLACs should muddle through.

Some kind of deal might save the public flagships.

All of the medical schools with midsize universities attached are toast. Harvard, Yale and Stanford will stumble forward, but most of the others will either have to get their goons to off Musk’s goons or face terrible pain.

The ultra rich SLACs hardly have grants at all. Their chem and bio faculty might not have the shiniest new tools, but there will be almost no change.

What are you going to do with your chem SLAC degree? Try to go get an advanced degree at some underfunded shrinking university stem department? Of course there will be a change.

Sure, but that is an issue with their graduate department, not their undergrad. The change you're speaking of is just an issue with research universities. The top SLAC grads will go on fine in their labs at Stanford and Uchicago.

Stanford and U-Chicago are atop the list of grants that are being cut. What was your point?

That it’s once again, not an LAC issue. This is really obvious.

Only underscores that there is no research going on at LACs

Tell that to my kid who did 3 years of research at her LAC, published and abstract, presented 2 posters at national conferences and is an author on a peer reviewed article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who is safe ??

Ultimately, no one. That’s the point.

[Anonymous]

Johns Hopkins officials said the NIH funding cut puts at risk approximately 600 current and ongoing clinical trials at Hopkins, including open clinical trials in cancer, pediatrics and children’s health, heart and vascular studies and the aging brain.

https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/higher-education/johns-hopkins-nih-federal-funds-lawsuit-FUEQYYTVNFEZJMSVCASDET3NJY/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who is safe ??

billionaires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Johns Hopkins officials said the NIH funding cut puts at risk approximately 600 current and ongoing clinical trials at Hopkins, including open clinical trials in cancer, pediatrics and children’s health, heart and vascular studies and the aging brain.

https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/higher-education/johns-hopkins-nih-federal-funds-lawsuit-FUEQYYTVNFEZJMSVCASDET3NJY/

Making America great again by…destroying our healthcare and research competitive advantages, day by day.