What ever happen to jeffrey epstein files ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

Yeah, but he very likely was not sober. Those 3am tweets-from-the-toilet were unhinged and have the potential to cause an international security incident while our country is asleep. Pretty clear that those crazy late night Tweets are when the meds are not working correctly (or he took too many).

President Six O'Clock Supper? No harm, no foul.

people drink all the time and he was single doing the time, so idc who he dates

she told him he was 20 or something, she looked 30 Trump was like 40
There is no “dating” a trafficked child, you weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

Yeah, but he very likely was not sober. Those 3am tweets-from-the-toilet were unhinged and have the potential to cause an international security incident while our country is asleep. Pretty clear that those crazy late night Tweets are when the meds are not working correctly (or he took too many).

President Six O'Clock Supper? No harm, no foul.

people drink all the time and he was single doing the time, so idc who he dates

she told him he was 20 or something, she looked 30 Trump was like 40
There is no “dating” a trafficked child, you weirdo.

I repeat. There is no “dating” a trafficked child, and there is no defense for pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

What do you mean what happened? The CIA and/or MOSSAD took him out - plain and simple. Sleeper agents activated. Cameras turned off. Logs fake. He was either offed or evacuated. Simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you mean what happened? The CIA and/or MOSSAD took him out - plain and simple. Sleeper agents activated. Cameras turned off. Logs fake. He was either offed or evacuated. Simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like I need to keep reposting this until you get it:

Sorry Trump defenders, but we aren't in some kind of flat earth cult, where we must desperately cling to the belief that the earth is flat because if that one thing is disproven, it somehow disproves our entire belief system.

Sorry it doesn't work that way. We continually get new info and evaluate it and unlike a cult, we aren't in a bubble with one monolithic source of information that is considered authoritative and above all.

If there's a sufficiently credible argument to disprove one thing it doesn't somehow magically make us disbelieve everything else under the sun. So even if Katie Johnson disappears, it still leaves Trump with a whole host of other serious problems.

So you're wasting your time posting over and over about Katie Johnson thinking that by doing that, you can make everything else go away.

So, you are admitting that Trump isn't a pedophile but possibly guilty of other behavior.

I still think it's highly likely that Trump had inappropriate sexual encounters with underaged women. There's a lot still being buried.

Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?
There are two big reasons.
By
Ryan Grim
Nov 2, 2016, 02:57 PM EDT
Updated Nov 4, 2016, 09:31 PM EDT


https://www.huffpost.com/...1d9834/amp

“For months, people have wondered why this case isn’t getting more ― or, really, any ― attention in the press, even now that Trump faces an actual court date: a Dec. 16 status conference with the judge.

The lawsuit against Trump includes affidavits from two anonymous women who say they were witnesses. Yet there’s been little coverage of the case. As one of the media outlets that has not published much about it, I can say there are two main reasons we shied away.

The accuser is anonymous.

The accuser in this case is anonymous, and the suit is filed under a pseudonym in New York. A previous case filed in California used the name “Katie Johnson.” To accuse someone in print of forcibly raping a child is about as serious a charge as can be made. To do that with an anonymous accuser would be an extraordinary step, putting the journalist’s reputation on the line.

One senior national reporter who has covered both campaigns said that the anonymity was the main stumbling block. “If it’s something that’s this damaging to a candidate, you better be sure, and she’s anonymous,” the reporter said, asking for anonymity to talk openly about the decision-making process. “Look, if she came out and she would do an interview, that would be different, but she’s an anonymous plaintiff.”

To go forward with an anonymous source shifts responsibility for the veracity of the claims from the accuser to the reporter. If the person is named and on record, the reporter can argue that he or she is merely reporting what the person is saying, and people are free to believe her or not. But giving anonymity says something different to an audience. It suggests, I, as a journalist, have investigated this person and these charges, and find them sufficiently credible to bring them forward without a name attached. Especially in the wake of the Rolling Stone fiasco, that requires an extreme amount of confidence in the source.
And the way the case rolled out did not inspire that confidence.
The accuser’s public backers have been savaged in the press.

One of the leading organizers of the effort to get the press to pay attention to this case is Steve Baer, an outspoken Republican donor. Baer last made news when his effort to out an alleged affair between Reps. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) contributed to McCarthy dropping his bid to become House speaker. Baer’s style is to liberally cc and bcc an endless stream of powerful people, and it usually has the effect of getting none of them to listen.
When I wrote to him Monday night, for instance, to say I was going to write a story on why the media were avoiding the child rape story, he replied and cc’ed Washington Post Executive Editor Marty Baron, along with a host of other media figures.

And Baer, in fact, is among the more credible advocates the accuser has going for her.
The accuser initially filed the case on her own behalf in California, but it was tossed for not stating an articulable violation of her civil rights. The case has since been refiled in New York, under the representation of a patent lawyer named Thomas Meagher. A patent lawyer handling the case hasn’t inspired the most confidence. (He didn’t respond to a request for comment.)

The least credible backer has to be a man who may or may not be named Al Taylor, but is more likely named Norm Lubow, and was apparently a former producer for “The Jerry Springer Show.”

Media outlets that have tried to get in touch with Johnson have had extreme difficulty doing so. The Daily Beast did a deep dive into the case and the people supporting the accuser in July, and came to a devastating conclusion: “Far from derailing the Trump train, Katie Johnson and her supporters seem to be in an out-of-control clown car whose wheels just came off,” wrote Brandy Zadrozny.

The Guardian and Jezebel also looked into the situation and came up with equally unfavorable takes. A writer who actually talked to Johnson came away confused about what to make of the allegations. It’s unclear if anybody has managed to speak to Tiffany Doe or Joan Doe, the two witnesses cited in the case. “Jezebel, The Guardian and The Daily Beast effectively poisoned the well on Katie’s credibility,” Baer lamented to HuffPost, accurately.“


Have you read why the “Katie Johnson” case is not considered credible by media outlets?

How do you have information regarding Trump being a pedophile? Are you a news reporter or law enforcement officer with a background in investigating sex accusations against Trump?

There is no Katie Johnson.

[Anonymous]

I mean...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean...

A previous analysis by Lead Stories, published on May 9, 2023, examined the image and concluded that the image was likely AI-generated. We reported that:

[A] reverse image search with TinEye, Yandex, and Bing does not return any copies of this image from an earlier time. All copies returned by Google were posted on Twitter since May 7, 2023. If this photo was authentic, it would have value to tabloid media -- and for the photo to suddenly become public without any explanation is a clue that it is a 2023 fabrication. The image also appears in another form posted on Twitter (archived here) with a stronger color saturation...

Examining the image with human eyes shows some clear deficits in the scene, most notably the absence of Epstein's legs, a head at the back of the couch, and an inexplicable number of hands at Epstein's shoulder. Some of the hands have the characteristic AI malformations that were present in recent versions of Midjourney.

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2024/04/fact-check-photo-does-not-show-p-diddy-trump-jeffrey-epstein-with-young-women.html

[Anonymous]

https://archive.org/details/screenshot-376

AI photos; not real

[Anonymous]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-image-purporting-show-180000983.html

Two fake, AI photos.

Who is posting this garbage? I thought dcum had standards?

[Anonymous]

Wa-Po:No Trump-Epstein link in latest document release


A Democratic lawmaker and social media posts mischaracterize Trump's relationship with the deceased sex predator.

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony last week related to the 2006 Florida case involving disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was alleged to have raped teenage girls. In 2019, after he was charged in federal court with sex trafficking of minors, guards found Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York. Investigators said he hanged himself.


But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.


When we asked Lieu’s office for evidence to back up his speculation, we were supplied with a variety of old Washington Post articles that explored the links between Trump and Epstein. But, contrary to Lieu’s statement, none shows that Trump engaged in anything inappropriate. Let’s explore what’s in the public record.

No credible allegation has emerged to connect Trump to any of Epstein’s crimes.


Lieu is a member of Congress who doesn’t need to rely on dubious social media posts for his information — especially if he’s going to make a statement like this. Trump wasn’t mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein documents. He was barely mentioned in the earlier batches. Rest assured — if Trump were prominently mentioned, it would have been a huge story.
Lieu earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios
🤥🤥🤥🤥

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wa-Po:No Trump-Epstein link in latest document release


A Democratic lawmaker and social media posts mischaracterize Trump's relationship with the deceased sex predator.

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony last week related to the 2006 Florida case involving disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was alleged to have raped teenage girls. In 2019, after he was charged in federal court with sex trafficking of minors, guards found Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York. Investigators said he hanged himself.


But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.


When we asked Lieu’s office for evidence to back up his speculation, we were supplied with a variety of old Washington Post articles that explored the links between Trump and Epstein. But, contrary to Lieu’s statement, none shows that Trump engaged in anything inappropriate. Let’s explore what’s in the public record.

No credible allegation has emerged to connect Trump to any of Epstein’s crimes.


Lieu is a member of Congress who doesn’t need to rely on dubious social media posts for his information — especially if he’s going to make a statement like this. Trump wasn’t mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein documents. He was barely mentioned in the earlier batches. Rest assured — if Trump were prominently mentioned, it would have been a huge story.
Lieu earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios
🤥🤥🤥🤥

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

Is this from the “fake news” Washington post? Next you’ll be quoting the “fake news” NY Times. You told us not to believe them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wa-Po:No Trump-Epstein link in latest document release


A Democratic lawmaker and social media posts mischaracterize Trump's relationship with the deceased sex predator.

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony last week related to the 2006 Florida case involving disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was alleged to have raped teenage girls. In 2019, after he was charged in federal court with sex trafficking of minors, guards found Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York. Investigators said he hanged himself.


But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.


When we asked Lieu’s office for evidence to back up his speculation, we were supplied with a variety of old Washington Post articles that explored the links between Trump and Epstein. But, contrary to Lieu’s statement, none shows that Trump engaged in anything inappropriate. Let’s explore what’s in the public record.

No credible allegation has emerged to connect Trump to any of Epstein’s crimes.


Lieu is a member of Congress who doesn’t need to rely on dubious social media posts for his information — especially if he’s going to make a statement like this. Trump wasn’t mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein documents. He was barely mentioned in the earlier batches. Rest assured — if Trump were prominently mentioned, it would have been a huge story.
Lieu earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios
🤥🤥🤥🤥

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

Is this from the “fake news” Washington post? Next you’ll be quoting the “fake news” NY Times. You told us not to believe them.

You are posting AI photos, you have major problems with the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wa-Po:No Trump-Epstein link in latest document release


A Democratic lawmaker and social media posts mischaracterize Trump's relationship with the deceased sex predator.

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony last week related to the 2006 Florida case involving disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was alleged to have raped teenage girls. In 2019, after he was charged in federal court with sex trafficking of minors, guards found Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York. Investigators said he hanged himself.


But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.


When we asked Lieu’s office for evidence to back up his speculation, we were supplied with a variety of old Washington Post articles that explored the links between Trump and Epstein. But, contrary to Lieu’s statement, none shows that Trump engaged in anything inappropriate. Let’s explore what’s in the public record.

No credible allegation has emerged to connect Trump to any of Epstein’s crimes.


Lieu is a member of Congress who doesn’t need to rely on dubious social media posts for his information — especially if he’s going to make a statement like this. Trump wasn’t mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein documents. He was barely mentioned in the earlier batches. Rest assured — if Trump were prominently mentioned, it would have been a huge story.
Lieu earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios
🤥🤥🤥🤥

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

Is this from the “fake news” Washington post? Next you’ll be quoting the “fake news” NY Times. You told us not to believe them.

You are posting AI photos, you have major problems with the truth.

You are wrong. I am a different poster. You can ask Jeff.

[Anonymous]

Trump was shot by a radicalized Republican who followed right wing social media figures, as evidenced by his Demolition Ranch t-shirt.

His insta account profile proclaims that he was on a quest to destroy Epstein's evil empire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wa-Po:No Trump-Epstein link in latest document release


A Democratic lawmaker and social media posts mischaracterize Trump's relationship with the deceased sex predator.

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony last week related to the 2006 Florida case involving disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was alleged to have raped teenage girls. In 2019, after he was charged in federal court with sex trafficking of minors, guards found Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York. Investigators said he hanged himself.


But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.


When we asked Lieu’s office for evidence to back up his speculation, we were supplied with a variety of old Washington Post articles that explored the links between Trump and Epstein. But, contrary to Lieu’s statement, none shows that Trump engaged in anything inappropriate. Let’s explore what’s in the public record.

No credible allegation has emerged to connect Trump to any of Epstein’s crimes.


Lieu is a member of Congress who doesn’t need to rely on dubious social media posts for his information — especially if he’s going to make a statement like this. Trump wasn’t mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein documents. He was barely mentioned in the earlier batches. Rest assured — if Trump were prominently mentioned, it would have been a huge story.
Lieu earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios
🤥🤥🤥🤥

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

Is this from the “fake news” Washington post? Next you’ll be quoting the “fake news” NY Times. You told us not to believe them.

You are posting AI photos, you have major problems with the truth.

You are wrong. I am a different poster. You can ask Jeff.

You are fine was AI photos spreading disinformation and lies, like that’s much better.